Criteria for Verification and Replanning Based on the Adaptive Radiotherapy Protocol "Best for Adaptive Radiotherapy" in Head and Neck Cancer

被引:3
作者
Bak, Bartosz [1 ,2 ]
Skrobala, Agnieszka [1 ,3 ]
Adamska, Anna [4 ]
Kazmierska, Joanna [1 ,2 ]
Jozefacka, Natalia [5 ]
Piotrowski, Tomasz [1 ,3 ]
Malicki, Julian [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Poznan Univ Med Sci, Dept Electroradiol, PL-61866 Poznan, Poland
[2] Greater Poland Canc Ctr, Dept Radiotherapy 2, PL-61866 Poznan, Poland
[3] Greater Poland Canc Ctr, Dept Med Phys, PL-61866 Poznan, Poland
[4] Greater Poland Canc Ctr, Dept & Radiotherapy Ward 1, PL-61866 Poznan, Poland
[5] Pedag Univ Krakow, Inst Psychol, PL-30084 Krakow, Poland
来源
LIFE-BASEL | 2022年 / 12卷 / 05期
关键词
radiotherapy planning; replanning; adaptive radiotherapy; head and neck cancer; image-guided radiation therapy; helical tomotherapy; INTENSITY-MODULATED RADIOTHERAPY; RADIATION-THERAPY; PAROTID-GLANDS; WEIGHT-LOSS; HELICAL TOMOTHERAPY; CLINICAL-OUTCOMES; ANATOMIC CHANGES; IMRT; ROBUSTNESS; REDUCTION;
D O I
10.3390/life12050722
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
No clear criteria have yet been established to guide decision-making for patient selection and the optimal timing of adaptive radiotherapy (ART) based on image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT). We have developed a novel protocol-the Best for Adaptive Radiotherapy (B-ART) protocol-to guide patient selection for ART. The aim of the present study is to describe this protocol, to evaluate its validity in patients with head and neck (HN) cancer, and to identify the anatomical and clinical predictors of the need for replanning. We retrospectively evaluated 82 patients with HN cancer who underwent helical tomotherapy (HT) and subsequently required replanning due to soft tissue changes upon daily MVCT. Under the proposed criteria, patients with anatomical changes >3 mm on three to four consecutive scans are candidates for ART. We compared the volumes on the initial CT scan (iCT) and the replanning CT (rCT) scan for the clinical target volumes (CTV1, referring to primary tumor or tumor bed and CTV2, metastatic lymph nodes) and for the parotid glands (PG) and body contour (B-body). The patients were stratified by primary tumor localization, clinical stage, and treatment scheme. The main reasons for replanning were: (1) a planning target volume (PTV) outside the body contour (n = 70; 85.4%), (2) PG shrinkage (n = 69; 84.1%), (3) B-body deviations (n = 69; 84.1%), and (4) setup deviations (n = 40; 48.8%). The replanning decision was made, on average, during the fourth week of treatment (n = 47; 57.3%). The mean reductions in the size of the right and left PG volumes were 6.31 cc (20.9%) and 5.98 cc (20.5%), respectively (p < 0.001). The reduction in PG volume was >= 30% in 30 patients (36.6%). The volume reduction in all of the anatomical structures was statistically significant. Four variables-advanced stage disease (T3-T4), chemoradiation, increased weight loss, and oropharyngeal localization-were significantly associated with the need for ART. The B-ART protocol provides clear criteria to eliminate random errors, and to allow for an early response to relevant changes in target volumes.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 42 条
  • [11] Clinical outcomes among patients with head and neck cancer treated by intensity-modulated radiotherapy with and without adaptive replanning
    Chen, Allen M.
    Daly, Megan E.
    Cui, Jing
    Mathai, Mathew
    Benedict, Stanley
    Purdy, James A.
    [J]. HEAD AND NECK-JOURNAL FOR THE SCIENCES AND SPECIALTIES OF THE HEAD AND NECK, 2014, 36 (11): : 1541 - 1546
  • [12] Will weight loss cause significant dosimetric changes of target volumes and organs at risk in nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy?
    Chen, Chuanben
    Fei, Zhaodong
    Chen, Lisha
    Bai, Penggang
    Lin, Xiang
    Pan, Jianji
    [J]. MEDICAL DOSIMETRY, 2014, 39 (01) : 34 - 37
  • [13] Feasibility of CBCT-based dose with a patient-specific stepwise HU-to-density curve to determine time of replanning
    Chen, Shifeng
    Le, Quynh
    Mutaf, Yildirim
    Lu, Wei
    Nichols, Elizabeth M.
    Yi, Byong Yong
    Leven, Tish
    Prado, Karl L.
    D'Souza, Warren D.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2017, 18 (05): : 64 - 69
  • [14] Dewan Abhinav, 2016, Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, V17, P985
  • [15] Duma MN, 2012, STRAHLENTHER ONKOL, V188, P243, DOI 10.1007/s00066-011-0041-8
  • [16] Radiotherapy for Head and Neck Cancer: Evaluation of Triggered Adaptive Replanning in Routine Practice
    Figen, Metin
    Colpan Oksuz, Didem
    Duman, Evrim
    Prestwich, Robin
    Dyker, Karen
    Cardale, Kate
    Ramasamy, Satiavani
    Murray, Patrick
    Sen, Mehmet
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2020, 10
  • [17] Developing an adaptive radiation therapy strategy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma
    Fung, Winky Wing Ki
    Wu, Vincent Wing Cheung
    Teo, Peter Man Lung
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH, 2014, 55 (02) : 293 - 304
  • [18] Radiotherapy equipment and departments in the European countries: Final results from the ESTRO-HERO survey
    Grau, Cai
    Defourny, Noemie
    Malicki, Julian
    Dunscombe, Peter
    Borras, Josep M.
    Coffey, Mary
    Slotman, Ben
    Bogusz, Marta
    Gasparotto, Chiara
    Lievens, Yolande
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2014, 112 (02) : 155 - 164
  • [19] Actual dose variation of parotid glands and spinal cord for nasopharyngeal cancer patients during radiotherapy
    Han, Chunhui
    Chen, Yi-Jen
    Liu, An
    Schultheiss, Timothy E.
    Wong, Jeffrey Y. C.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2008, 70 (04): : 1256 - 1262
  • [20] Repeat CT imaging and replanning during the course of IMRT for head-and-neck cancer
    Hansen, EK
    Bucci, MK
    Quivey, JM
    Weinberg, V
    Xia, P
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2006, 64 (02): : 355 - 362