Value of corporate social responsibility for multiple stakeholders and social impact-Relationship marketing perspective

被引:135
作者
Pfajfar, Gregor [1 ]
Shoham, Aviv [2 ]
Malecka, Agnieszka [3 ]
Zalaznik, Maja [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ljubljana, Sch Econ & Business, Kardeljeva Pl 17, Ljubljana 1000, Slovenia
[2] Univ Haifa, Sch Management, 199 Aba Khoushy Ave Mt Carmel, IL-31905 Haifa, Israel
[3] Univ Econ Katowice, Ul 1 Maja 50, PL-40287 Katowice, Poland
关键词
CSR; Relationship marketing; Relationship quality; Commitment; Social impact; Stakeholder theory; RELATIONSHIP QUALITY; ORGANIZATIONAL COMMITMENT; FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE; CUSTOMER SATISFACTION; PREDICTIVE-VALIDITY; VALUE CREATION; MEDIATING ROLE; CSR; SUSTAINABILITY; TRUST;
D O I
10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.01.051
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Despite extensive corporate social responsibility (CSR) literature most of research has examined corporate performance as its only outcome. We aim to fill this gap by assessing companies' perceptions of their CSR ac-tivities' benefits for society and specific stakeholders. We discuss societal trends such as diversity and inclusion embedded in employee-focused CSR conceptualization as a prerequisite for the perception of CSR's societal impact. We bring together CSR and relationship marketing theories to test a conceptual model on a sample of 411 business-to-business (B2B) companies. The results confirm a positive relationship between employee-oriented CSR and the perceived usefulness of CSR actions for society, customers and employees (but not suppliers). In order to maximize relationship quality, CSR activities should be targeted at specific stakeholders (customers and employees) and not at society at large. Finally, differences are observed between SMEs and large B2B firms with opposite perceptions of antecedents and outcomes of relationship quality.
引用
收藏
页码:46 / 61
页数:16
相关论文
共 153 条
[1]  
Adam S., 2004, EMERGENCE SOCIAL ENT, V4
[2]   Does corporate social responsibility really increase customer relationship quality? A meta-analytic review [J].
Aljarah, Ahmad ;
Emeagwali, Lawrence ;
Ibrahim, Blend ;
Ababneh, Bashar .
SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY JOURNAL, 2018, 16 (01) :28-49
[3]  
ALMOMANI H Q., 2019, Journal of Relationship Marketing, V18, P108, DOI [DOI 10.1080/15332667.2018.1534062, 10.1080/15332667.2018.1534062]
[4]   STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING IN PRACTICE - A REVIEW AND RECOMMENDED 2-STEP APPROACH [J].
ANDERSON, JC ;
GERBING, DW .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1988, 103 (03) :411-423
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2009, COOPERATION POLITICA, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-90-481-2350-6_7
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2019, SME PERFORMANCE REV
[7]  
Ardichvili A., 2002, Human Resource Development International, V5, P99, DOI DOI 10.1080/13678860110046225
[8]   ESTIMATING NONRESPONSE BIAS IN MAIL SURVEYS [J].
ARMSTRONG, JS ;
OVERTON, TS .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 1977, 14 (03) :396-402
[9]  
Aube Caroline., 2007, J MANAGE PSYCHOL, V22, P479, DOI [10.1108/02683940710757209, DOI 10.1108/02683940710757209]
[10]   The effect of buyer pressure on suppliers in SMEs to demonstrate CSR practices: An added incentive or counter productive? [J].
Baden, D. A. ;
Harwood, I. A. ;
Woodward, D. G. .
EUROPEAN MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2009, 27 (06) :429-441