Genotype x environment interaction as it relates to egg production in turkeys (Meleagris gallopavo)

被引:4
作者
Case, L. A. [1 ]
Kelly, M. J. [1 ]
Miller, S. P. [1 ]
Wood, B. J. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Guelph, Dept Anim & Poultry Sci, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada
[2] Hybrid Turkeys, Kitchener, ON, Canada
关键词
egg production; fertility; genotype x environment interaction; hatchability; heritability; turkey; INCREASED BODY-WEIGHT; BREEDING PROGRAMS; RANDOM REGRESSION; LAYING HENS; GROWTH-RATE; SELECTION; MODEL; TEMPERATE; FERTILITY; GENETICS;
D O I
10.2527/jas.2009-2004
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Genotype x environment (GxE) interactions can reduce the accuracy of a model to predict the performance of an animal and have an undesirable influence if not accounted for when estimating breeding values. Consequently, identification of these GxE is necessary when considering a turkey breeding program. Reranking based on the genetic prediction of turkey egg production, fertility, and hatchability in different seasons was indicative of a potential GxE interaction. Quantification of the GxE interactions was based on the genetic correlation estimated when traits were expressed in different seasons. Egg production was expressed as the percentage of days with an egg produced; fertility represented the proportion of hatched eggs that contained a fertile embryo; and hatchability was defined as the percentage of fertile eggs that produced a live bird. Variance components and heritability for egg production, fertility, and hatchability were estimated using ASReml. The heritability (h(2)) of egg production was calculated to be 0.32 for both lines with the phenotypic (sigma(2)(p)) and genetic (sigma(2)(g)) variance, 141.3 and 45.58 (percent days with egg produced)(2) and 118.3 and 38.35 (percent days with egg produced)(2) for female and male lines, respectively. The h(2) estimates for fertility were 0.08 in both lines with sigma(2)(p) and sigma(2)(g) of 293.3%(2) and 24.03%(2), and 576.9%(2) and 48.43%(2) for female and male lines, respectively. The hatchability h(2), sigma(2)(p), and sigma(2)(g) estimates were 0.09, 267.1%(2), and 24.44%(2), respectively, for the female line and 0.15, 582.2%(2), and 90.01%(2) for the male line, respectively. Based on an animal model, the variance components were used to calculate estimated breeding values for each trait. The annual fluctuation in estimated breeding values resulted in the need to evaluate egg number, fertility, and hatchability as 2 traits, summer and winter lay. The correlation between the 2 traits was less than unity (female line: r(egg production) = 0.76, r(fertility) = -0.20, r(hatchability) = 0.75 and male line: r(egg production) = 0.86, r(fertility) = 0.19, r(hatchability) = 0.68) suggesting a GxE interaction, and animals will significantly rerank in genetic predictions for these reproductive phenotypes in different seasons of lay. Egg production, fertility, and hatchability in turkeys could be considered as 2 distinct traits in an animal model based on season of lay.
引用
收藏
页码:1957 / 1966
页数:10
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]   Monthly model for genetic evaluation of laying hens -: II.: Random regression [J].
Anang, A ;
Mielenz, N ;
Schüler, L .
BRITISH POULTRY SCIENCE, 2002, 43 (03) :384-390
[2]  
ASMUNDSON V. S., 1935, POULTRY SCI, V14, P259, DOI 10.3382/ps.0140259
[3]   QUANTITATIVE GENETICS OF REACTION NORMS [J].
DEJONG, G .
JOURNAL OF EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY, 1990, 3 (5-6) :447-468
[4]   GENETIC INFLUENCES ON SEASONAL DECLINE IN THE FERTILITY OF FEMALE TURKEYS [J].
DUNNINGTON, EA ;
VANKREY, HP ;
HULET, RM ;
DENBOW, DM .
POULTRY SCIENCE, 1990, 69 (03) :365-368
[5]  
Falconer D.S., 1996, Quantitative Genetics, V4th
[6]  
Gilmour A.R., 2002, ASREML USER GUIDE RE
[7]   IMPLICATIONS OF GENOTYPE ENVIRONMENT INTERACTIONS IN ANIMAL BREEDING - GENOTYPE LOCATION INTERACTIONS IN POULTRY [J].
HARTMANN, W .
WORLDS POULTRY SCIENCE JOURNAL, 1990, 46 (03) :197-210
[8]   Comparison of the performance of 1966-versus 2003-type turkeys when fed representative 1966 and 2003 turkey diets: Growth rate, livability, and feed conversion [J].
Havenstein, G. B. ;
Ferket, P. R. ;
Grimes, J. L. ;
Qureshi, M. A. ;
Nestor, K. E. .
POULTRY SCIENCE, 2007, 86 (02) :232-240
[9]  
HORN P, 1974, WORLDS POULTR C EXP, P14
[10]  
Keirs B., 1982, Poultry Digest, V41, P354