DNA Shape versus Sequence Variations in the Protein Binding Process

被引:6
作者
Chen, Chuanying [1 ]
Pettitt, B. Montgomery [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Med Branch, Dept Biochem & Mol Biol, Sealy Ctr Struct Biol & Mol Biophys, Galveston, TX 77555 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院; 美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
DYNAMICS SIMULATION; DEFORMABILITY; RECOGNITION; SPECIFICITY; MOLECULE; ENTROPY; SEARCH; ENZYME;
D O I
10.1016/j.bpj.2015.11.3527
中图分类号
Q6 [生物物理学];
学科分类号
071011 ;
摘要
The binding process of a protein with a DNA involves three stages: approach, encounter, and association. It has been known that the complexation of protein and DNA involves mutual conformational changes, especially for a specific sequence association. However, it is still unclear how the conformation and the information in the DNA sequences affects the binding process. What is the extent to which the DNA structure adopted in the complex is induced by protein binding, or is instead intrinsic to the DNA sequence? In this study, we used the multiscale simulation method to explore the binding process of a protein with DNA in terms of DNA sequence, conformation, and interactions. We found that in the approach stage the protein can bind both the major and minor groove of the DNA, but uses different features to locate the binding site. The intrinsic conformational properties of the DNA play a significant role in this binding stage. By comparing the specific DNA with the nonspecific in unbound, intermediate, and associated states, we found that for a specific DNA sequence, similar to 40% of the bending in the association forms is intrinsic and that similar to 60% is induced by the protein. The protein does not induce appreciable bending of nonspecific DNA. In addition, we proposed that the DNA shape variations induced by protein binding are required in the early stage of the binding process, so that the protein is able to approach, encounter, and form an intermediate at the correct site on DNA.
引用
收藏
页码:534 / 544
页数:11
相关论文
共 41 条
[11]   DNA Dynamics and Single-Molecule Biology [J].
Duzdevich, Daniel ;
Redding, Sy ;
Greene, Eric C. .
CHEMICAL REVIEWS, 2014, 114 (06) :3072-3086
[12]   Bullied no more: when and how DNA shoves proteins around [J].
Fogg, Jonathan M. ;
Randall, Graham L. ;
Pettitt, B. Montgomery ;
Sumners, De Witt L. ;
Harris, Sarah A. ;
Zechiedrich, Lynn .
QUARTERLY REVIEWS OF BIOPHYSICS, 2012, 45 (03) :257-299
[13]  
Foloppe N, 2000, J COMPUT CHEM, V21, P86, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1096-987X(20000130)21:2<86::AID-JCC2>3.0.CO
[14]  
2-G
[15]   Brownian dynamics simulation of protein-protein diffusional encounter [J].
Gabdoulline, RR ;
Wade, RC .
METHODS-A COMPANION TO METHODS IN ENZYMOLOGY, 1998, 14 (03) :329-341
[16]   Control of DNA minor groove width and Fis protein binding by the purine 2-amino group [J].
Hancock, Stephen P. ;
Ghane, Tahereh ;
Cascio, Duilio ;
Rohs, Remo ;
Di Felice, Rosa ;
Johnson, Reid C. .
NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH, 2013, 41 (13) :6750-6760
[17]   Importance of accurate DNA structures in solution: The Jun-Fos model [J].
Heddi, Brahim ;
Foloppe, Nicolas ;
Oguey, Christophe ;
Hartmann, Brigitte .
JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 2008, 382 (04) :956-970
[18]   Solution structure of the MEF2A-DNA complex: structural basis for the modulation of DNA bending and specificity by MADS-box transcription factors [J].
Huang, K ;
Louis, JM ;
Donaldson, L ;
Lim, FL ;
Sharrocks, AD ;
Clore, GM .
EMBO JOURNAL, 2000, 19 (11) :2615-2628
[19]   Speed-stability paradox in DNA-scanning by zinc-finger proteins [J].
Iwahara, Junji ;
Levy, Yaakov .
TRANSCRIPTION-AUSTIN, 2013, 4 (02) :58-61
[20]   Functional specificity of a Hox protein mediated by the recognition of minor groove structure [J].
Joshi, Rohit ;
Passner, Jonathan M. ;
Rohs, Remo ;
Jain, Rinku ;
Sosinsky, Alona ;
Crickmore, Michael A. ;
Jacob, Vinitha ;
Aggarwal, Aneel K. ;
Honig, Barry ;
Mann, Richard S. .
CELL, 2007, 131 (03) :530-543