Laparoscopic appendicectomy is associated with a lower complication rate even during the introductory phase

被引:10
作者
Kapischke, M
Tepel, J
Bley, K
机构
[1] Ruhr Univ Bochum, Univ Hosp, Knappschaftskrankenhaus Bochum Langendreer, Dept Surg, D-44892 Bochum, Germany
[2] Univ Hosp Schleswig Holstein, Dept Gen & Thorac Surg, Kiel, Germany
[3] Friedrich Ebert Hosp, Clin Gen Surg, Neumunster, Germany
关键词
open appendicectomy; laparoscopic appendicectomy; conversion rate; complications; retrospective study;
D O I
10.1007/s00423-004-0511-x
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The benefit of laparoscopic appendicectomy is under debate. To study the beneficial clinical effects of laparoscopic appendicectomy during the introductory phase we analysed, retrospectively, 493 patients from one district general hospital. Patients and methods: During a period of 3 years 250 patients were operated on prospectively by open appendicectomy, and 243 patients were operated on laparoscopically. Both groups were compared with regard to their demographic data, operation time, body mass index and complication rate. Results: The conversion rate was 4.5%. The distribution of histological stages of inflammation was comparable in both groups. The median operating time was significantly longer for the open (40 min) than for the laparoscopic procedure (35 min, P=0.002). The body mass index in the laparoscopic group was significant higher (23.7 kg/m(2) vs 22.6 kg/m(2), P=0.009). Perioperative white blood cell count, C-reactive protein and body temperature were equal in both groups. There was no significant difference with regard to the analgesia required postoperatively between the open and the laparoscopic group. Nevertheless, the specific complication rate after open appendicectomy (18.4%) was significantly higher than that following laparoscopic appendicectomy (10.8%, P=0.03). Conclusion: Even during the introductory phase, laparoscopic appendicectomy is a safe and clinically beneficial operating procedure.
引用
收藏
页码:517 / 523
页数:7
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]  
ACKERMANNS, 1996, SURG PATHOLOGY
[2]   The road to ambulatory laparoscopic management of perforated appendicitis [J].
Alvarez, C ;
Voitk, AJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2000, 179 (01) :63-66
[3]   Small bowel obstruction after appendicectomy [J].
Andersson, REB .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2001, 88 (10) :1387-1391
[4]   A meta analysis of randomized controlled trials of laparoscopic versus conventional appendectomy [J].
Chung, RS ;
Rowland, DY ;
Li, P ;
Diaz, J .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1999, 177 (03) :250-256
[5]   Prospective randomized comparison of open versus laparoscopic appendectomy in men [J].
Cox, MR ;
McCall, JL ;
Toouli, J ;
Padbury, RTA ;
Wilson, TG ;
Wattchow, DA ;
Langcake, M .
WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1996, 20 (03) :263-266
[6]   LAPAROSCOPIC APPENDECTOMY - A PROSPECTIVE ANALYSIS [J].
COX, MR ;
MCCALL, JL ;
WILSON, TG ;
PADBURY, RTA ;
JEANS, PL ;
TOOULI, J .
AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1993, 63 (11) :840-847
[7]  
EHLERT HG, 1998, ZENTRALBL CHIR, V4, P101
[8]   Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: Between evidence and common sense [J].
Eypasch, E ;
Sauerland, S ;
Lefering, R ;
Neugebauer, EAM .
DIGESTIVE SURGERY, 2002, 19 (06) :518-522
[9]  
Frazee RC, 1996, ARCH SURG-CHICAGO, V131, P509
[10]   Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing laparoscopic and open appendectomy [J].
Garbutt, JM ;
Soper, NJ ;
Shannon, WD ;
Botero, A ;
Littenberg, B .
SURGICAL LAPAROSCOPY & ENDOSCOPY, 1999, 9 (01) :17-26