Physicochemical properties and starch digestibility of whole grain sorghums, millet, quinoa and amaranth flours, as affected by starch and non-starch constituents

被引:120
作者
Srichuwong, Sathaporn [1 ,2 ]
Curti, Delphine [1 ]
Austin, Sean [1 ]
King, Roberto [1 ]
Lamothe, Lisa [1 ]
Gloria-Hernandez, Hugo [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Nestle Res Ctr, POB 44, CH-1026 Lausanne, Switzerland
[2] ICL Food Specialties, Dr Albert Reimann Str 2, D-68526 Ladenburg, Germany
[3] ALINFO Ltda, Food Res & Dev, Eluchans 1250, Vina Del Mar, India
关键词
Cereals; Pseudocereals; Starch; Whole grain; Physicochemical property; ALPHA-AMYLASE; CHENOPODIUM-QUINOA; AMYLOSE CONTENT; PHYTIC ACID; PSEUDOCEREALS; HYPOCHONDRIACUS; STABILITY; GLUTEN;
D O I
10.1016/j.foodchem.2017.04.019
中图分类号
O69 [应用化学];
学科分类号
081704 ;
摘要
Minor grains such as sorghum, millet, quinoa and amaranth can be alternatives to wheat and corn as ingredients for whole grain and gluten-free products. In this study, influences of starch structures and other grain constituents on physicochemical properties and starch digestibility of whole flours made from these grains were investigated. Starches were classified into two groups according to their amylopectin branch chain-length: (i) quinoa, amaranth, wheat (shorter chains); and (ii) sorghum, millet, corn (longer chains). Such amylopectin features and amylose content contributed to the differences in thermal and pasting properties as well as starch digestibility of the flours. Non-starch constituents had additional impacts; proteins delayed starch gelatinization and pasting, especially in sorghum flours, and high levels of soluble fibre retarded starch retrogradation in wheat, quinoa and amaranth flours. Enzymatic hydrolysis of starch was restricted by the presence of associated protein matrix and enzyme inhibitors, but accelerated by endogenous amylolytic enzymes. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 10
页数:10
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]   Nutritive value of pseudocereals and their increasing use as functional gluten-free ingredients [J].
Alvarez-Jubete, L. ;
Arendt, E. K. ;
Gallagher, E. .
TRENDS IN FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2010, 21 (02) :106-113
[2]   Pasting, paste, and gel properties of starch-hydrocolloid combinations [J].
BeMiller, James N. .
CARBOHYDRATE POLYMERS, 2011, 86 (02) :386-423
[3]   Genetic and environmental variation in sorghum starch properties [J].
Beta, T ;
Corke, H .
JOURNAL OF CEREAL SCIENCE, 2001, 34 (03) :261-268
[4]   Interactions among macronutrients in wheat flour determine their enzymic susceptibility [J].
Bhattarai, Rewati R. ;
Dhital, Sushil ;
Gidley, Michael J. .
FOOD HYDROCOLLOIDS, 2016, 61 :415-425
[5]  
CHINNASWAMY R, 1988, CEREAL CHEM, V65, P138
[6]   Phenolic acid content of sorghum and maize cultivars varying in hardness [J].
Chiremba, Constance ;
Taylor, John R. N. ;
Rooney, Lloyd W. ;
Beta, Trust .
FOOD CHEMISTRY, 2012, 134 (01) :81-88
[7]   EFFECTS OF PHYTIC ACID, DIVALENT-CATIONS, AND THEIR INTERACTIONS ON ALPHA-AMYLASE ACTIVITY [J].
DESHPANDE, SS ;
CHERYAN, M .
JOURNAL OF FOOD SCIENCE, 1984, 49 (02) :516-&
[8]  
Englyst KN, 1999, AM J CLIN NUTR, V69, P448
[9]   ELECTROPHORETIC CHARACTERIZATION OF QUINOA SEED PROTEINS [J].
FAIRBANKS, DJ ;
BURGENER, KW ;
ROBISON, LR ;
ANDERSEN, WR ;
BALLON, E .
PLANT BREEDING, 1990, 104 (03) :190-195
[10]  
FAO, 2013, INT YEAR QUIN