Predicting Corneal Graft Rejection by Confocal Microscopy

被引:11
作者
Kocaba, Viridiana [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Colica, Caterina [4 ]
Rabilloud, Muriel [5 ,6 ,7 ]
Burillon, Carole [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Hop Edouard Herriot, Hosp Civils Lyon, Dept Ophthalmol, F-69003 Lyon, France
[2] Univ Lyon, Lyon, France
[3] Hop Edouard Herriot, Hosp Civils Lyon, Eye Bank, F-69003 Lyon, France
[4] Univ Roma La Sapienza, Policlin Umberto Hosp 1, Rome, Italy
[5] Univ Lyon 1, F-69622 Villeurbanne, France
[6] Hosp Civils Lyon, Serv Biostat, Lyon, France
[7] CNRS, Equipe Biostat Sante, Lab Biometrie & Biol Evolut, UMR 5558, Villeurbanne, France
关键词
perforating keratoplasty; confocal microscopy; cornea graft rejection; activated keratocytes; PENETRATING KERATOPLASTY; RISK-FACTORS; TRANSPLANT REJECTION; HLA-A; FAILURE; DONOR; APOPTOSIS; SURVIVAL; IMMUNOLOGY; MECHANISMS;
D O I
10.1097/ICO.0000000000000540
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose: This study aims at estimating corneal healing by activated keratocyte (AK) counting with in vivo confocal microscopy after perforating keratoplasty (PK). It assesses the value of AK counting in predicting corneal graft rejection. Methods: This prospective single-center observational study included 45 patients who benefited from PK in 2013 and were followed up over 2 years. All were monitored by confocal microscopy at day 1, day 7, and monthly thereafter. The AKs were counted in 5 optical sections in each of the anterior, middle, and posterior stroma. The ability of AKs in predicting the occurrence of corneal rejection was assessed by comparison of AK counts between patients with and without clinical signs of rejection. Results: In patients with graft rejection, the AK counts increased significantly 2 months before the clinical diagnosis of rejection, whereas it remained stable after 4 months in patients without rejection. In patient with graft rejection, the AK count reached a maximum at the rejection diagnosis and antirejection treatment initiation but decreased significantly 1 month after treatment initiation. Conclusions: This study confirmed the predictive value of AK counting in corneal graft rejection. The increase in the AK count allowed predicting graft rejection 2 months before the clinical diagnosis of rejection; it may then be the first sign of subclinical rejection.
引用
收藏
页码:S61 / S64
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Confocal microscopy in lattice corneal dystrophy
    A. G.-Y. Chiou
    Roger W. Beuerman
    Stephen C. Kaufman
    Herbert E. Kaufman
    Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, 1999, 237 : 697 - 701
  • [22] Machine learning methods to identify risk factors for corneal graft rejection in keratoconus
    Feizi, Sepehr
    Javadi, Mohammad Ali
    Bayat, Kia
    Arzaghi, Mohammadreza
    Rahdar, Amir
    Ahmadi, Mohammad Javad
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2024, 14 (01):
  • [23] Corneal Neurotization With a Great Auricular Nerve Graft: Effective Reinnervation Demonstrated by In Vivo Confocal Microscopy
    Benkhatar, Hakim
    Levy, Ora
    Goemaere, Isabelle
    Borderie, Vincent
    Laroche, Laurent
    Bouheraoua, Nacim
    CORNEA, 2018, 37 (05) : 647 - 650
  • [24] In Vivo Confocal Microscopy of Corneal Nerves: Analysis and Clinical Correlation
    Cruzat, Andrea
    Pavan-Langston, Deborah
    Hamrah, Pedram
    SEMINARS IN OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2010, 25 (5-6) : 171 - 177
  • [25] Aging and corneal layers: an in vivo corneal confocal microscopy study
    Gambato, Catia
    Longhin, Evelyn
    Catania, Anton Giulio
    Lazzarini, Daniela
    Parrozzani, Raffaele
    Midena, Edoardo
    GRAEFES ARCHIVE FOR CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2015, 253 (02) : 267 - 275
  • [26] Aging and corneal layers: an in vivo corneal confocal microscopy study
    Catia Gambato
    Evelyn Longhin
    Anton Giulio Catania
    Daniela Lazzarini
    Raffaele Parrozzani
    Edoardo Midena
    Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, 2015, 253 : 267 - 275
  • [27] In Vivo Characteristics of Corneal Endothelium/Descemet Membrane Complex for the Diagnosis of Corneal Graft Rejection
    Abou Shousha, Mohamed
    Yoo, Sonia H.
    Sayed, Mohamed S.
    Edelstein, Sean
    Council, Matthew
    Shah, Ravi S.
    Abernathy, Joshua
    Schmitz, Zachary
    Stuart, Patrick
    Bentivegna, Rocio
    Fernandez, Maria P.
    Smith, Christopher
    Yin, Xiaotang
    Harocopos, George J.
    Dubovy, Sander R.
    Feuer, William J.
    Wang, Jianhua
    Perez, Victor L.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2017, 178 : 27 - 37
  • [28] Corneal confocal microscopy: ready for prime time
    Petropoulos, Ioannis N.
    Ponirakis, Georgios
    Khan, Adnan
    Gad, Hoda
    Almuhannadi, Hamad
    Brines, Michael
    Cerami, Anthony
    Malik, Rayaz A.
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPTOMETRY, 2020, 103 (03) : 265 - 277
  • [29] Confocal microscopy in posterior polymorphous corneal dystrophy
    Chiou, AGY
    Kaufman, SC
    Beuerman, RW
    Maitchouk, D
    Kaufman, HE
    OPHTHALMOLOGICA, 1999, 213 (04) : 211 - 213
  • [30] In vivo confocal corneal microscopy after keratoplasty
    Imre, L
    Resch, M
    Nagymihály, A
    OPHTHALMOLOGE, 2005, 102 (02): : 140 - 146