Predicting Corneal Graft Rejection by Confocal Microscopy

被引:11
|
作者
Kocaba, Viridiana [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Colica, Caterina [4 ]
Rabilloud, Muriel [5 ,6 ,7 ]
Burillon, Carole [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Hop Edouard Herriot, Hosp Civils Lyon, Dept Ophthalmol, F-69003 Lyon, France
[2] Univ Lyon, Lyon, France
[3] Hop Edouard Herriot, Hosp Civils Lyon, Eye Bank, F-69003 Lyon, France
[4] Univ Roma La Sapienza, Policlin Umberto Hosp 1, Rome, Italy
[5] Univ Lyon 1, F-69622 Villeurbanne, France
[6] Hosp Civils Lyon, Serv Biostat, Lyon, France
[7] CNRS, Equipe Biostat Sante, Lab Biometrie & Biol Evolut, UMR 5558, Villeurbanne, France
关键词
perforating keratoplasty; confocal microscopy; cornea graft rejection; activated keratocytes; PENETRATING KERATOPLASTY; RISK-FACTORS; TRANSPLANT REJECTION; HLA-A; FAILURE; DONOR; APOPTOSIS; SURVIVAL; IMMUNOLOGY; MECHANISMS;
D O I
10.1097/ICO.0000000000000540
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose: This study aims at estimating corneal healing by activated keratocyte (AK) counting with in vivo confocal microscopy after perforating keratoplasty (PK). It assesses the value of AK counting in predicting corneal graft rejection. Methods: This prospective single-center observational study included 45 patients who benefited from PK in 2013 and were followed up over 2 years. All were monitored by confocal microscopy at day 1, day 7, and monthly thereafter. The AKs were counted in 5 optical sections in each of the anterior, middle, and posterior stroma. The ability of AKs in predicting the occurrence of corneal rejection was assessed by comparison of AK counts between patients with and without clinical signs of rejection. Results: In patients with graft rejection, the AK counts increased significantly 2 months before the clinical diagnosis of rejection, whereas it remained stable after 4 months in patients without rejection. In patient with graft rejection, the AK count reached a maximum at the rejection diagnosis and antirejection treatment initiation but decreased significantly 1 month after treatment initiation. Conclusions: This study confirmed the predictive value of AK counting in corneal graft rejection. The increase in the AK count allowed predicting graft rejection 2 months before the clinical diagnosis of rejection; it may then be the first sign of subclinical rejection.
引用
收藏
页码:S61 / S64
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] In Vivo Confocal Microscopy Demonstrates Increased Immune Cell Densities in Corneal Graft Rejection Correlating With Signs and Symptoms
    Chirapapaisan, Chareenun
    Abbouda, Alessandro
    Jamali, Arsia
    Mueller, Rodrigo T.
    Cavalcanti, Bernardo M.
    Colon, Clara
    Witkin, Deborah
    Sahin, Afsun
    Dana, Reza
    Cruzat, Andrea
    Hamrah, Pedram
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2019, 203 : 26 - 36
  • [2] Prognostic factors for corneal graft recovery after severe corneal graft rejection following penetrating keratoplasty
    Yamazoe, Katsuya
    Yamazoe, Kyoko
    Shimazaki-Den, Seika
    Shimazaki, Jun
    BMC OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2013, 13
  • [3] Advances in corneal graft rejection
    Yin, Jia
    CURRENT OPINION IN OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2021, 32 (04) : 331 - 337
  • [4] In vivo confocal microscopy of subepithelial infiltrates in human corneal transplant rejection
    Niederer, Rachael L.
    Sherwin, Trevor
    McGhee, Charles N. J.
    CORNEA, 2007, 26 (04) : 501 - 504
  • [5] Risk factors for corneal graft rejection after penetrating keratoplasty for keratoconus
    Alsubaie, Hamad
    Alrubaian, Ahmad
    Ahmad, Khabir
    Ahad, Muhammad Ali
    INTERNATIONAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2024, 44 (01)
  • [6] In vivo confocal microscopy in recurrent granular dystrophy in corneal graft after penetrating keratoplasty
    Traversi, Claudio
    Martone, Gianluca
    Malandrini, Alex
    Tosi, Gian Marco
    Caporossi, Aldo
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2006, 34 (08): : 808 - 810
  • [7] Predicting the risk for corneal graft rejection by aqueous humor analysis
    Maier, Philip
    Heizmann, Ulrike
    Boehringer, Daniel
    Kern, Yvonne
    Reinhard, Thomas
    MOLECULAR VISION, 2011, 17 (114): : 1016 - 1023
  • [8] Effect of Donor and Recipient Factors on Corneal Graft Rejection
    Stulting, R. Doyle
    Sugar, Alan
    Beck, Roy
    Belin, Michael
    Dontchev, Mariya
    Feder, Robert S.
    Gal, Robin L.
    Holland, Edward J.
    Kollman, Craig
    Mannis, Mark J.
    Price, Francis, Jr.
    Stark, Walter
    Verdier, David D.
    CORNEA, 2012, 31 (10) : 1141 - 1147
  • [9] IMPACT OF RECIPIENT PREOPERATIVE FACTORS ON CORNEAL GRAFT REJECTION AFTER PENETRATING KERATOPLASTY
    Surchev, Nikolay L.
    Vassileva, Petja I.
    COMPTES RENDUS DE L ACADEMIE BULGARE DES SCIENCES, 2013, 66 (10): : 1487 - 1494
  • [10] The changing face of corneal graft rejection
    Faraj, Lana Akram
    Hashmani, Khurram
    Khatib, Tasneem
    Al-Aqaba, Mouhamed
    Dua, Harminder Singh
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2012, 96 (08) : 1049 - 1050