Anisotropic finite hyper-elastoplasticity of geomaterials with Drucker-Prager/Cap type constitutive model formulation

被引:26
作者
Bennett, K. C. [1 ]
Regueiro, R. A. [2 ]
Luscher, D. J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Los Alamos Natl Lab, Theoret Div, Fluid Dynam & Solid Mech Grp, Los Alamos, NM 87545 USA
[2] Univ Colorado, Dept Civil Environm & Architectural Engn, Boulder, CO 80309 USA
关键词
Eshelby-Mandel; Drucker-Prager; Anisotropy; Finite deformation; Geomaterials; Plasticity; MULTIPLICATIVE ELASTOPLASTICITY; STRAIN ELASTOPLASTICITY; GRANULAR-MATERIALS; MATERIAL BEHAVIOR; PLASTICITY MODEL; CONTINUUM MODEL; YIELD CRITERIA; ESHELBY STRESS; DEFORMATION; DISSIPATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijplas.2018.11.010
中图分类号
TH [机械、仪表工业];
学科分类号
0802 ;
摘要
The formulation of large strain anisotropic hyper-elastoplasticity of geomaterials is examined. Attention is given to the role of structure tensors (also called fabric tensors), especially in context of the Eshelby-Mandel stress and large inelastic volume changes attributable to porosity. Both (hyper-)elastic and inelastic orthotropic symmetry, reducing to the particular case of transverse isotropy, are considered. Specific material assumptions and constitutive choices are identified for the development of a novel Anisotropic Drucker-Prager/Cap (ADPC) model formulated within the intermediate configuration consistent with multiplicative split of the deformation gradient. The model is calibrated to existing experimental measurements, including high pressure large strain triaxial compression of lithographic (Solnhofen) limestone and triaxial compression measurements on Tournemire shale assessing elastoplastic anisotropy. Manifest implications of constitutive theory are investigated, including consequences of recognizing (or not) the Eshelby-Mandel stress as energy conjugate to the plastic velocity gradient and including (or not) contribution from the skew-symmetric parts of the Mandel stress to the plastic anisotropy. Numerical simple shear experiments and large deformation simulated indentation experiments are provided in order to investigate model predictions and demonstrate the overall robustness in finite element modeling.
引用
收藏
页码:224 / 250
页数:27
相关论文
共 121 条
[1]  
Abaqus, 2011, TECHNICAL REPORT
[2]   BOUNDING SURFACE PLASTICITY .3. APPLICATION TO ANISOTROPIC COHESIVE SOILS [J].
ANANDARAJAH, A ;
DAFALIAS, YF .
JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING MECHANICS-ASCE, 1986, 112 (12) :1292-1318
[3]   Modeling large strain anisotropic elasto-plasticity with logarithmic strain and stress measures [J].
Angel Caminero, Miguel ;
Javier Montans, Francisco ;
Bathe, Klaus-Juergen .
COMPUTERS & STRUCTURES, 2011, 89 (11-12) :826-843
[4]   Reservoir stress path and induced seismic anisotropy: results from linking coupled fluid-flow/geomechanical simulation with seismic modelling [J].
Angus, D. A. ;
Fisher, Q. J. ;
Segura, J. M. ;
Verdon, J. P. ;
Kendall, J. -M. ;
Dutko, M. ;
Crook, A. J. L. .
PETROLEUM SCIENCE, 2016, 13 (04) :669-684
[5]  
[Anonymous], HERON
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2011, Abaqus Theory Manual - version 6.11
[7]  
[Anonymous], 1960, CLASSICAL FIELD THEO
[8]  
[Anonymous], 1981, MATH SCI ENG
[9]   A new thermodynamical framework for finite strain multiplicative elastoplasticity coupled to anisotropic damage [J].
Balieu, R. ;
Kringos, N. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PLASTICITY, 2015, 70 :126-150
[10]  
Barbin Evelyne., 2012, A History of Algorithms: From the Pebble to the Microchip