Groundwater Potential Mapping in Hubei Region of China Using Machine Learning, Ensemble Learning, Deep Learning and AutoML Methods

被引:33
|
作者
Bai, Zhigang [1 ,2 ]
Liu, Qimeng [2 ]
Liu, Yu [1 ]
机构
[1] Anhui Univ Sci & Technol, State Key Lab Min Response & Disaster Prevent & C, Huainan 232001, Peoples R China
[2] Anhui Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Earth & Environm, Huainan 232001, Peoples R China
关键词
Groundwater potential mapping; Random forest (RF); Stacking; Convolutional Neural Network (CNN); GIS; RANDOM FOREST; LOGISTIC-REGRESSION; ENTROPY MODELS; DELINEATION; AQUIFER; FLOWS; AREA;
D O I
10.1007/s11053-022-10100-4
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
Freshwater scarcity has become more widespread on a global scale in recent years. Surface water resources are no longer sufficient to meet the demands of human productivity and survival, and groundwater resources are now being utilized extensively. Therefore, exploration of potential groundwater resources is critical for their rational development and utilization. In this study, four methods of machine learning, ensemble learning, deep learning, and automated machine learning (AutoML) were selected, and their representative models were chosen for comprehensive groundwater potential mapping (GPM) in Hubei Province, China. In total, 812 samples were collected and acquired; about 80% of the samples were selected randomly as training data set and the remaining 20% as test data set. Considering local hydrological, geological and climatic conditions, slope, elevation, curvature, landforms, geology, distance to fault, land type, soils, precipitation, evaporation, topographic wetness index, stream power index, distance to rivers, normalized difference vegetation index, and distance to residential area were selected as factors in this work. Finally, the four models were validated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC)-area under the curve (AUC) and classification reports. The Shap values of each factor were calculated as a measure of contribution of each factor to groundwater potential. The results showed that the ROC-AUC values of random forest, Stacking, convolutional neural network, and AutoML were 0.82, 0.85, 0.87 and 0.88, and the precision values were 0.793, 0.784, 0.807 and 0.844, respectively. These results indicate that the first application of AutoML to GPM in this study was feasible, and it had the best predictive ability and accuracy compared with the other three methods. In addition, the Shap values indicated that the two factors that had the greatest influence on groundwater potential were geology and precipitation. The results obtained in this study can provide technical support to the local government for groundwater exploration and development in Hubei Province, and the newly introduced method of AutoML can provide new ideas to experts and scholars for groundwater potential assessment.
引用
收藏
页码:2549 / 2569
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Groundwater Potential Mapping in Hubei Region of China Using Machine Learning, Ensemble Learning, Deep Learning and AutoML Methods
    Zhigang Bai
    Qimeng Liu
    Yu Liu
    Natural Resources Research, 2022, 31 : 2549 - 2569
  • [2] Mapping and modeling groundwater potential using machine learning, deep learning and ensemble learning models in the Saiss basin (Fez-Meknes region, Morocco)
    Ragragui, Hind
    Aouragh, My Hachem
    El-Hmaidi, Abdellah
    Ouali, Lamya
    Saouita, Jihane
    Iallamen, Zineb
    Ousmana, Habiba
    Jaddi, Hajar
    El Ouali, Anas
    GROUNDWATER FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2024, 26
  • [3] A Comparison of AutoML Tools for Machine Learning, Deep Learning and XGBoost
    Ferreira, Luis
    Pilastri, Andre
    Martins, Carlos Manuel
    Pires, Pedro Miguel
    Cortez, Paulo
    2021 INTERNATIONAL JOINT CONFERENCE ON NEURAL NETWORKS (IJCNN), 2021,
  • [4] Status of Groundwater Potential Mapping Research Using GIS and Machine Learning
    Saro, Lee
    Fetemeh, Rezaie
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING, 2020, 36 (06) : 1277 - 1290
  • [5] Combination of Metaheuristic Optimization Algorithms and Machine Learning Methods for Groundwater Potential Mapping
    AlAyyash, Saad
    Al-Fugara, A'kif
    Shatnawi, Rania
    Al-Shabeeb, Abdel Rahman
    Al-Adamat, Rida
    Al-Amoush, Hani
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (03)
  • [6] Ensemble methods in machine learning
    Dietterich, TG
    MULTIPLE CLASSIFIER SYSTEMS, 2000, 1857 : 1 - 15
  • [7] Groundwater Salinity Susceptibility Mapping Using Classifier Ensemble and Bayesian Machine Learning Models
    Mosavi, Amirhosein
    Hosseini, Farzaneh Sajedi
    Choubin, Bahram
    Goodarzi, Massoud
    Dineva, Adrienn A.
    IEEE ACCESS, 2020, 8 : 145564 - 145576
  • [8] Quadratic Discriminant Analysis Based Ensemble Machine Learning Models for Groundwater Potential Modeling and Mapping
    Duong Hai Ha
    Phong Tung Nguyen
    Romulus Costache
    Nadhir Al-Ansari
    Tran Van Phong
    Huu Duy Nguyen
    Mahdis Amiri
    Rohit Sharma
    Indra Prakash
    Hiep Van Le
    Hanh Bich Thi Nguyen
    Binh Thai Pham
    Water Resources Management, 2021, 35 : 4415 - 4433
  • [9] Quadratic Discriminant Analysis Based Ensemble Machine Learning Models for Groundwater Potential Modeling and Mapping
    Duong Hai Ha
    Phong Tung Nguyen
    Costache, Romulus
    Al-Ansari, Nadhir
    Tran Van Phong
    Huu Duy Nguyen
    Amiri, Mahdis
    Sharma, Rohit
    Prakash, Indra
    Van Le, Hiep
    Hanh Bich Thi Nguyen
    Binh Thai Pham
    WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, 2021, 35 (13) : 4415 - 4433
  • [10] Investigating machine learning and ensemble learning models in groundwater potential mapping in arid region: case study from Tan-Tan water-scarce region, Morocco
    Jari, Abdessamad
    Bachaoui, El Mostafa
    Hajaj, Soufiane
    Khaddari, Achraf
    Khandouch, Younes
    El Harti, Abderrazak
    Jellouli, Amine
    Namous, Mustapha
    FRONTIERS IN WATER, 2023, 5