Estimations of relative biological effectiveness of secondary fragments in carbon ion irradiation of water using CR-39 plastic detector and microdosimetric kinetic model

被引:9
|
作者
Hirano, Yoshiyuki [1 ]
Kodaira, Satoshi [2 ]
Souda, Hikaru [1 ]
Osaki, Kohei [1 ]
Torikoshi, Masami [1 ]
机构
[1] Gunma Univ, Heavy Ion Med Ctr, 3-39-22 Showa Machi, Maebashi, Gumma 3718511, Japan
[2] Natl Inst Quantum & Radiol Sci & Technol, Natl Inst Radiol Sci, Inage Ku, 4-9-1 Anagawa, Chiba 2638555, Japan
关键词
CR-39; heavy ion therapy; microdosimetric kinetic model; RBE; secondary fragments; NUCLEAR TRACK DETECTOR; CELL-SURVIVAL; MEV/U C-12; CHARGE RESOLUTION; RADIATION; GEANT4; SYSTEM; BEAM; SENSITIVITY; DEPENDENCE;
D O I
10.1002/mp.13916
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose To estimate relative biological effectiveness (RBE) ascribed to secondary fragments in a lateral distribution of carbon ion irradiation. The RBE was estimated with the microdosimetric kinetic (MK) model and measured linear energy transfer (LET) obtained with CR-39 plastic detectors. Methods A water phantom was irradiated by a C-12 pencil beam with energy of 380 MeV/u at the Gunma University Heavy Ion Medical Center (GHMC), and CR-39 detectors were exposed to secondary fragments. Because CR-39 was insensitive to low LET, we conducted Monte Carlo simulations with Geant4 to calculate low LET particles. The spectra of low LET particles were combined with experimental spectra to calculate RBE. To estimate accuracy of RBE, we calculated RBE by changing yield of low LET particles by +/- 10% and +/- 40%. Results At a small angle, maximum RBE by secondary fragments was 1.3 for 10% survival fractions. RBE values of fragments gradually decreased as the angle became larger. The shape of the LET spectra in the simulation reproduced the experimental spectra, but there was a discrepancy between the simulation and experiment for the relative yield of fragments. When the yield of low LET particles was changed by +/- 40%, the change in RBE was smaller than 10%. Conclusions An RBE of 1.3 was expected for secondary fragments emitted at a small angle. Although, we observed a discrepancy in the relative yield of secondary fragments between simulation and experiment, precision of RBE was not so sensitive to the yield of low LET particles.
引用
收藏
页码:781 / 789
页数:9
相关论文
共 5 条
  • [1] A systematic analysis of the particle irradiation data ensemble in the key of the microdosimetric kinetic model: Should clonogenic data be used for clinical relative biological effectiveness?
    Suarez-Garcia, Daniel
    Cortes-Giraldo, Miguel Antonio
    Bertolet, Alejandro
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2023, 185
  • [2] Estimation of relative biological effectiveness for boron neutron capture therapy using the PHITS code coupled with a microdosimetric kinetic model
    Horiguchi, Hironori
    Sato, Tatsuhiko
    Kumada, Hiroaki
    Yamamoto, Tetsuya
    Sakae, Takeji
    JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH, 2015, 56 (02) : 382 - 390
  • [3] On the calculation of the relative biological effectiveness of ion radiation therapy using a biological weighting function, the microdosimetric kinetic model (MKM) and subsequent corrections (non-Poisson MKM and modified MKM)
    Parisi, Alessio
    Furutani, Keith M.
    Beltran, Chris J.
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2022, 67 (09)
  • [4] Understanding Relative Biological Effectiveness and Clinical Outcome of Prostate Cancer Therapy Using Particle Irradiation : Analysis of Tumor Control Probability With the Modified Microdosimetric Kinetic Model
    Besuglow, Judith
    Tessonnier, Thomas
    Mein, Stewart
    Eichkorn, Tanja
    Haberer, Thomas
    Herfarth, Klaus
    Abdollahi, Amir
    Debus, Jurgen
    Mairani, Andrea
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2024, 119 (05): : 1545 - 1556
  • [5] Validation of the relative biological effectiveness of active-energy scanning carbon-ion radiotherapy on a commercial treatment planning system with a microdosimetic kinetic model
    Wang, Weiwei
    Sun, Wei
    Shen, Hao
    Zhao, Jingfang
    RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2023, 18 (01)