The use of time during lexical processing and segmentation: A review

被引:48
作者
Mattys, SL
机构
[1] State University of New York, Stony Brook, NY
[2] Department of Psychology, SUNY Stony Brook, Stony Brook
关键词
D O I
10.3758/BF03210789
中图分类号
B841 [心理学研究方法];
学科分类号
040201 ;
摘要
Speech, by its very nature, is a time-based phenomenon. Speech sounds are temporally distributed with the presentation of one sound roughly conditioned by the fading of the previous one. In this review, three classes of models are discussed with respect to the sequential nature of speech. It is argued that the three resulting conceptions of time are linked to the type of segmentation process proposed by these models to deal with speech continuity. In the first one, lexical activation is viewed as perfectly synchronized with the temporal deployment of speech. This type of model corresponds to the traditional left-to-right (proactive) account of lexical processing. Because serious segmentation problems exist for such an approach (e.g,, car and card are embedded in cardinal), the second type of model treats word recognition as the result of a mechanism that sometimes delays commitment on word identity beyond word offset, Lexical activation, instead of shadowing the unfolding of time, lags behind it until an unambiguous decision can be made. The temporarily unprocessed information is stored in a memory buffer. In the third approach, a prosodic cue (lexical stress) contributes actively to speech. segmentation and lexical processing. Every stressed syllable encountered in the signal is postulated as a word onset and thus constitutes the starting point of lexical activation, However, with non-initial-stressed words, retroactive procedures going ''back in time'' must be used, Finally, the use of time (including proactive, delayed, and retroactive procedures) is discussed in light of cross-linguistic phonological differences.
引用
收藏
页码:310 / 329
页数:20
相关论文
共 193 条
[21]   SOME SUFFIX EFFECTS ON LIP-READ LISTS [J].
CAMPBELL, R ;
DODD, B .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE PSYCHOLOGIE, 1982, 36 (03) :508-514
[22]  
Chodorow M. S., 1979, Sentence processing: Psycholinguistics studies presented to Merrill Garrett, P87
[23]  
Chomsky Noam., 1968, The sound pattern of English
[24]   SIMILARITY NEIGHBORHOODS OF SPOKEN 2-SYLLABLE WORDS - RETROACTIVE EFFECTS ON MULTIPLE ACTIVATION [J].
CLUFF, MS ;
LUCE, PA .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 1990, 16 (03) :551-563
[25]  
Cole R. A., 1978, STRATEGIES INFORMATI, P67
[26]  
Cole R.A., 1980, Perception and production of fluent speech, P133, DOI DOI 10.4324/9781315638935
[27]   HOW ARE SYLLABLES USED TO RECOGNIZE WORDS [J].
COLE, RA ;
JAKIMIK, J .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1980, 67 (03) :965-970
[28]   LISTENING FOR MISPRONUNCIATIONS - MEASURE OF WHAT WE HEAR DURING SPEECH [J].
COLE, RA .
PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 1973, 13 (1A) :153-156
[29]   EFFECTS OF LEXICAL STRESS ON PHONETIC CATEGORIZATION [J].
CONNINE, CM ;
CLIFTON, C ;
CUTLER, A .
PHONETICA, 1987, 44 (03) :133-146
[30]   DO THE BEGINNINGS OF SPOKEN WORDS HAVE A SPECIAL STATUS IN AUDITORY WORD RECOGNITION [J].
CONNINE, CM ;
BLASKO, DG ;
TITONE, D .
JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 1993, 32 (02) :193-210