Autonomy loss, privacy invasion and data misuse as psychological barriers to peer-to-peer collaborative car use

被引:9
作者
Hunecke, Marcel [1 ]
Richter, Nadine [1 ]
Heppner, Holger [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Appl Sci & Arts Dortmund, Fac Appl Social Sci, Dortmund, Germany
关键词
Collaborative car use; Carsharing; Ridesharing; Psychological barriers; Theory of planned behavior; TRAVEL MODE CHOICE; PLANNED BEHAVIOR; SHARING SERVICES; PERSONAL-SPACE; MOBILITY; VEHICLE; MOTIVES; TRANSPORTATION; WILLINGNESS; DRIVERS;
D O I
10.1016/j.trip.2021.100403
中图分类号
U [交通运输];
学科分类号
08 ; 0823 ;
摘要
The present study aimed to identify psychological barriers which potentially prevent individuals from implementing collaborative car use in their every-day mobility behaviour. We suggested a model consisting of four psychological barriers: Autonomy Loss, Privacy Invasion, Interpersonal Distrust, and Data Misuse. Perceived Financial Benefit was included as a main incentive for collaborative car use. Using two samples, a community (N = 176) and a student sample (N = 265), three forms of peer-to-peer collaborative car use were examined: lending your own car to another private person (Lending To), renting a car from another private person (Renting From) and sharing rides with others (Ridesharing). For all three forms, a standardised questionnaire was developed which included the psychological barriers, self-reported collaborative car use intention and behaviour, and evaluations of scenarios. The results showed that different barriers predicted specific forms of collaborative car use: Autonomy Loss was connected negatively with Ridesharing and Privacy Invasion predicted Lending To negatively. Data Misuse was related negatively with Renting From, when the renting was arranged via internet. Interpersonal Distrust showed no predictive value for collaborative car use. Perceived Financial Benefit was a consistent incentive for all forms of collaborative car use. Overall, the results confirm the relevance of psychological barriers for collaborative car use. Practical implications to overcome the psychological barriers are discussed.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 67 条
[21]   Psychological correlates of car use: A meta-analysis [J].
Gardner, Benjamin ;
Abraham, Charles .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART F-TRAFFIC PSYCHOLOGY AND BEHAVIOUR, 2008, 11 (04) :300-311
[22]   Going Green? Modeling the Impact of Environmental Concerns and Perceptions of Transportation Alternatives on Decisions to Drive [J].
Gardner, Benjamin ;
Abraham, Charles .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2010, 40 (04) :831-849
[23]   The Dragons of Inaction Psychological Barriers That Limit Climate Change Mitigation and Adaptation [J].
Gifford, Robert .
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 2011, 66 (04) :290-302
[24]   Multimodal divide: Reproduction of transport poverty in smart mobility trends [J].
Groth, Soeren .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART A-POLICY AND PRACTICE, 2019, 125 :56-71
[25]   Take me on a ride: The role of environmentalist identity for carpooling [J].
Hartl, Barbara ;
Kamleitner, Bernadette ;
Holub, Sandra .
PSYCHOLOGY & MARKETING, 2020, 37 (05) :663-676
[26]   Reduced use of environmentally friendly modes of transportation caused by perceived mobility necessities: An extension of the theory of planned behavior [J].
Haustein, Sonja ;
Hunecke, Marcel .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2007, 37 (08) :1856-1883
[27]   PERSONAL-SPACE - WHERE WE NOW STAND [J].
HAYDUK, LA .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1983, 94 (02) :293-335
[28]   Extending the theory of planned behavior: Predicting the use of public transportation [J].
Heath, Y ;
Gifford, R .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2002, 32 (10) :2154-2189
[29]   What cognitive mechanisms predict travel mode choice? A systematic review with meta-analysis [J].
Hoffmann, Christin ;
Abraham, Charles ;
White, Mathew P. ;
Ball, Susan ;
Skippon, Stephen M. .
TRANSPORT REVIEWS, 2017, 37 (05) :631-652
[30]   Cutoff Criteria for Fit Indexes in Covariance Structure Analysis: Conventional Criteria Versus New Alternatives [J].
Hu, Li-tze ;
Bentler, Peter M. .
STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING-A MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL, 1999, 6 (01) :1-55