The effects of reading on pixel vs. paper: a comparative study

被引:7
作者
Cinar, Murat [1 ]
Dogan, Dilek [2 ]
Seferoglu, Suleyman Sadi [1 ]
机构
[1] Hacettepe Univ, Dept Comp Educ & Instruct Technol, Fac Educ, TR-06800 Ankara, Turkey
[2] Ankara Univ, Dept Comp Educ & Instruct Technol, Ankara, Turkey
关键词
Visual display units; comprehension; reading completion time; mobile devices; human-computer interaction; GENDER-DIFFERENCES; SCREEN; COMPREHENSION; PERFORMANCE; STUDENTS; TEXTS;
D O I
10.1080/0144929X.2019.1685594
中图分类号
TP3 [计算技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
The aim of this study was to examine the effects that reading on screens (using digital devices with different screen sizes) and on paper have on reading time and comprehension. The study group was comprised of126 secondary students from a private school. To ensure balance, the participants were assigned into test groups, formed according to the size of the reading device, based on class levels, gender, and average school grade. In the data collection process, a narrative text was transferred to both print and electronic media. Access to the text was provided on paper and three digital devices. There were no time limitations. After reading, participants were given comprehension tests that consisted of twenty multiple-choice questions. Female participants' on-screen comprehension scores were found to be relatively higher compared to their paper comprehension scores. They also acquired better scores as the screen size increased. Conversely, male participants had higher comprehension scores on tablets and smart phones. Participants who read the text on smart phones and tablets completed the tasks in less time compared to other groups. However, the effects of reading modality on comprehension and reading time were not found to be statistically significant in either the male or female groups.
引用
收藏
页码:251 / 259
页数:9
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   Taking reading comprehension exams on screen or on paper? A metacognitive analysis of learning texts under time pressure [J].
Ackerman, Rakefet ;
Lauterman, Tirza .
COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2012, 28 (05) :1816-1828
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2011, DRUG SAFETY UPDATE, V4, pH1
[3]  
APStatistics, 2015, AMSSTATNEWS MEMBERSH
[4]  
Aydemir Z, 2013, KURAM UYGUL EGIT BIL, V13, P2272
[5]  
Baaran M., 2014, USAK U J SOCIAL SCI, V2014, P248, DOI [10.12780/UUSBD307, DOI 10.12780/UUSBD307]
[6]  
Bastug M., 2012, Atatrk niversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstits Dergisi, V16, P73
[7]  
BELMORE SM, 1985, B PSYCHONOMIC SOC, V23, P12
[8]   Gender, context, and reading: A comparison of students in 43 countries [J].
Chiu, Ming Ming ;
McBride-Chang, Catherine .
SCIENTIFIC STUDIES OF READING, 2006, 10 (04) :331-362
[9]   E-textbooks at what cost? Performance and use of electronic v. print texts [J].
Daniel, David B. ;
Woody, William Douglas .
COMPUTERS & EDUCATION, 2013, 62 :18-23
[10]  
Demirel M., 1992, HACETTEPE U EITIM FA, V8, P325