Assessing the accuracy of computerized medication histories

被引:0
作者
Kaboli, PJ
McClimon, BJ
Hoth, AB
Barnett, MJ
机构
[1] Iowa City VA Med Ctr, Ctr Res Implementat Innovat Strategies Practicep, Iowa City, IA USA
[2] Univ Iowa, Carver Coll Med, Dept Med, Div Gen Internal Med, Iowa City, IA USA
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: To determine the accuracy of computerized medication histories. Study Design: Cross-sectional observational study. Patients and Methods: The study sample included 493 Department of Veterans Affairs primary care patients aged 65 years or older who were receiving at least 5 prescriptions. A semistructured interview confirmed medication, allergy, and adverse drug reaction (ADR) histories. Accuracy of the computerized medication lists was assessed, including omissions (medications not on the computer record) and commissions (medications on the computer record that were no longer being taken). Allergy and ADR records also were assessed. Results: Patients were taking a mean of 12.4 medications: 65% prescription, 23% over-the-counter products, and 12% vitamins/herbals. There was complete agreement between the computer medication list and what the patient was taking for only 5.3% of patients. There were 3.1 drug omissions per patient, and 25% of the total number of medications taken by patients were omitted from the electronic medical record. There were 1.3 commissions per patient, and the patients were not taking 12.6% of all active medications on the computer profile. In addition, 23.2% of allergies and 63.9% of ADRs were not in the computerized record. Conclusions: Very few computerized medication histories were accurate. Inaccurate medication information may compromise patient care and limit the utility of medication databases for research and for assessment of the quality of prescribing and disease management.
引用
收藏
页码:872 / 877
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   COMPARISONS BETWEEN WRITTEN AND COMPUTERIZED PATIENT HISTORIES [J].
QUAAK, MJ ;
WESTERMAN, RF ;
VANBEMMEL, JH .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1987, 295 (6591) :184-190
[32]   SOME CONSIDERATIONS ON EVALUATION OF COMPUTERIZED CASE HISTORIES [J].
FELLINGER, K .
WIENER KLINISCHE WOCHENSCHRIFT, 1972, 84 (15) :238-+
[33]   Image accuracy of plain film radiography and computerized tomography in assessing morphological abnormality of impacted teeth [J].
Bodner, L ;
Bar-Ziv, J ;
Becker, A .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2001, 120 (06) :623-628
[34]   Assessing the Accuracy of Cone-Beam Computerized Tomography in Measuring Thinning Oral and Buccal Bone [J].
Rasko, Zoltan ;
Nagy, Lili ;
Radnai, Marta ;
Piffko, Jozsef ;
Barath, Zoltan .
JOURNAL OF ORAL IMPLANTOLOGY, 2016, 42 (03) :311-314
[35]   Assessing the accuracy of a computerized decision support system for digoxin dosing in primary care: an observational study [J].
Kroese, WLG ;
Avery, AJ ;
Savelyich, BSP ;
Brown, NS ;
Schers, H ;
Howard, R ;
Hippisley-Cox, J ;
Horsfield, P .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACY AND THERAPEUTICS, 2005, 30 (03) :279-283
[36]   Medication histories in healthy blood donors [J].
Holland, L. L. ;
Scoggin, D. ;
Land, K. J. .
TRANSFUSION, 2006, 46 (09) :199A-199A
[37]   PATIENTS' PERSPECTIVES ON THE PROBLEMS WITH MEDICATION HISTORIES [J].
Halapy, Henry ;
Kertland, Heather .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL PHARMACY, 2008, 61 :49-50
[38]   USE OF PHARMACIST IN OBTAINING MEDICATION HISTORIES [J].
MCHALE, MK ;
CANADA, AT .
DRUG INTELLIGENCE & CLINICAL PHARMACY, 1969, 3 (04) :115-&
[39]   Assessing the Accuracy of Information on Medication Abortion: A Comparative Analysis of ChatGPT and Google Bard AI [J].
Mediboina, Anjali ;
Badam, Rajani Kumari ;
Chodavarapu, Sailaja .
CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 16 (01)
[40]   Assessing the accuracy and quality of medication history collection: effect of implementation of electronic health record [J].
Lanham, Kena ;
Saum, Lindsay ;
Reeves, David ;
Scherer, Colleen ;
Johnston, Beth ;
Antonopoulos, Anthony ;
Sorensen, Suellyn .
PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2013, 33 (10) :E257-E258