Comparison between plethysmography and body fat equations in elite taekwondo athletes

被引:5
作者
Monterrosa Quintero, Armando [1 ]
Fonseca, Charles [2 ]
Chagnaud, Coralie Arc [3 ]
De la Rosa, Adrian [4 ]
机构
[1] Catholic Univ East, Res Grp SER SICIDE, Dept Phys Educ & Sports, Antioquia, Rionegro, Colombia
[2] Univ Fed Santa Catarina, Biomech Lab, Florianopolis, SC, Brazil
[3] Univ Poitiers, Fac Sci Sport, Lab MOVE, F-86000 Poitiers, France
[4] Unidades Tecnol Santander UTS, Sports Sci & Innovat Res Grp GICED, Lab Exercise Physiol, Bucaramanga, Colombia
来源
IDO MOVEMENT FOR CULTURE-JOURNAL OF MARTIAL ARTS ANTHROPOLOGY | 2022年 / 22卷 / 02期
关键词
martial arts; anthropometric evaluation; body composition; skinfold thickness; air displacement plethysmography; AIR-DISPLACEMENT PLETHYSMOGRAPHY; BIOELECTRICAL-IMPEDANCE ANALYSIS; X-RAY ABSORPTIOMETRY; CORRELATION-COEFFICIENT; SKINFOLD THICKNESS; ASSESSING VALIDITY; DENSITY; RELIABILITY; PREDICTION; CHILDREN;
D O I
10.14589/ido.22.2.2
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Background. In taekwondo, body composition and body fat percentage (BF%) are decisive factors in the result of combat between elite athletes. In recent years, air displacement plethysmography (ADP) has appeared as a reference method to evaluate BF%, while skinfold-based equations can be used in those cases in which people are unable to access such equipment. Problem and Aim: To determine the degree of agreement between the BF% estimated by the ADP method and by different skinfold-based equations in male taekwondo athletes. Methods. 12 elite Brazilian male athletes (19.5 +/- 3.8 years old) were evaluated using the International Society for the Advancement of Kinanthropometry (ISAK) protocol. BF% was estimated using 9 skinfold-based equations whose results were compared with those of the ADP method. Results. The mean of the BF% measured using the reference method was 8.9 +/- 5.4. Agreement between skinfold based equations and ADP methods was examined by the Bland-Altman method. The narrowest limits of agreement relative to the reference were for the Katch & McArdle skinfold-based equation (-5.5, 5.9) containing 95% (11/12) of the score difference. The mean difference (bias) of the measurements between ADP and the anthropometric methods was (0.18 +/- 2.9). Conclusions. These results suggest that the Katch & McArdle equation, applying body density from the Brozek et al equation. [1963], could be considered the most appropriate method to determine BF%, as its results are closest to those established by the ADP method. This equation presents good repeatability and concordance, small percentage error, and ease of use in the body fat evaluation of taekwondo athletes.
引用
收藏
页码:14 / 22
页数:9
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]   MEASUREMENT IN MEDICINE - THE ANALYSIS OF METHOD COMPARISON STUDIES [J].
ALTMAN, DG ;
BLAND, JM .
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES D-THE STATISTICIAN, 1983, 32 (03) :307-317
[2]  
BELLACH B, 1993, EUR J CLIN NUTR, V47, pS42
[3]  
Biaggi RR, 1999, AM J CLIN NUTR, V69, P898
[4]   Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement [J].
Bland, J. Martin ;
Altman, Douglas G. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING STUDIES, 2010, 47 (08) :931-936
[5]   STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) :307-310
[6]   Comparison of body composition methods in overweight and obese Brazilian women [J].
Braulio, Valeria Bender ;
Soares Furtado, Valeria Cristina ;
Silveira, Maria das Gracas ;
Fonseca, Maria Helena ;
Oliveira, Jose Egidio .
ARQUIVOS BRASILEIROS DE ENDOCRINOLOGIA E METABOLOGIA, 2010, 54 (04) :398-405
[7]   Physical and Physiological Profiles of Taekwondo Athletes [J].
Bridge, Craig A. ;
Santos, Jonatas Ferreira da Silva ;
Chaabene, Helmi ;
Pieter, Willy ;
Franchini, Emerson .
SPORTS MEDICINE, 2014, 44 (06) :713-733
[8]   DENSITOMETRIC ANALYSIS OF BODY COMPOSITION REVISION OF SOME QUANTIATIVE ASSUMPTIONS [J].
BROZEK, J ;
ANDERSON, JT ;
KEYS, A ;
GRANDE, F .
ANNALS OF THE NEW YORK ACADEMY OF SCIENCES, 1963, 110 (01) :113-&
[9]  
Carey D, 2000, J SPORT MED PHYS FIT, V40, P254
[10]  
Carter J, 1982, Physical Structure of Olympic Athletes, P107, DOI [10.1159/000406783, DOI 10.1159/000406783]