Environmental and health co-benefits for advanced phosphorus recovery

被引:116
作者
Tonini, Davide [1 ]
Saveyn, Hans G. M. [1 ]
Huygens, Dries [1 ]
机构
[1] European Commiss, Joint Res Ctr, Directorate Growth & Innovat, Circular Econ & Ind Leadership Unit, Seville, Spain
关键词
LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; WASTE-WATER; EUROPEAN-UNION; MANAGEMENT; FERTILIZER; EMISSIONS; INVENTORY; IMPACTS; TECHNOLOGIES; AGRICULTURE;
D O I
10.1038/s41893-019-0416-x
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Worldwide food production is largely dependent on rock phosphate, a finite raw material used for the production of concentrated phosphorus fertilizers. With the aim to close the biogeochemical phosphorus cycle across regions and urban-rural systems, advanced phosphorus recovery applies thermochemical and precipitation techniques to transform locally available biogenic materials into concentrated phosphorus fertilizers. Due to insufficient insights into the consequential impacts of these circular processes, opportunities to align advanced phosphorus recovery with agricultural sustainability are still widely unknown. Here we show that environmental and health life cycle impacts are often lower for phosphorus fertilizers sourced from secondary raw materials than for rock phosphate-derived products, especially in areas of high livestock and population density. Including externalities from rock phosphate extraction and avoided current-day management of biogenic materials in the comparative product life cycle severely alters the cost assessment relative to an analysis that considers only internal costs from manufacturers' production processes. Societal costs incurred for circular products derived from sewage sludge, manure and meat and bone meal are up to 81%, 50% and 10% lower than for rock-derived superphosphate, respectively. Even without accounting for rock phosphate depletion risks, short-term and local environmental and health co-benefits might underlie the societal cost effectiveness of advanced phosphorus recovery.
引用
收藏
页码:1051 / 1061
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Co-benefits of a flexitarian diet for air quality and human health in Europe
    Himics, Mihaly
    Giannakis, Elias
    Kushta, Jonilda
    Hristov, Jordan
    Sahoo, Amarendra
    Perez-Dominguez, Ignacio
    ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2022, 191
  • [22] Identifying the Social, Urban, and Environmental Co-Benefits of Coworking Spaces in Irish Towns
    Wall, Stephen
    Crowe, Philip R.
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2024, 16 (01)
  • [23] Co-benefits of peaking carbon dioxide emissions on air quality and health, a case of Guangzhou, China
    Wu, Pengcheng
    Guo, Fang
    Cai, Bofeng
    Wang, Can
    Lv, Chen
    Liu, Hui
    Huang, Jizhang
    Huang, Ying
    Cao, Libin
    Pang, Lingyun
    Gao, Ji
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2021, 282
  • [24] Environmental Benefits and Burdens of Phosphorus Recovery from Municipal Wastewater
    Bradford-Hartke, Zenah
    Lane, Joe
    Lant, Paul
    Leslie, Gregory
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 49 (14) : 8611 - 8622
  • [25] Thin-Film Photovoltaic Power Generation Offers Decreasing Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Increasing Environmental Co-benefits in the Long Term
    Bergesen, Joseph D.
    Heath, Garvin A.
    Gibon, Thomas
    Suh, Sangwon
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2014, 48 (16) : 9834 - 9843
  • [26] Integrated crop-livestock-bioenergy system brings co-benefits and trade-offs in mitigating the environmental impacts of Chinese agriculture
    Xing, Jiahao
    Song, Junnian
    Liu, Chaoshuo
    Yang, Wei
    Duan, Haiyan
    Yabar, Helmut
    Ren, Jingzheng
    NATURE FOOD, 2022, 3 (12): : 1052 - 1064
  • [27] Co-benefits from sustainable dietary shifts for population and environmental health: an assessment from a large European cohort study
    Laine, Jessica E.
    Huybrechts, Inge
    Gunter, Marc J.
    Ferrari, Pietro
    Weiderpass, Elisabete
    Tsilidis, Kostas
    Aune, Dagfinn
    Schulze, Matthias B.
    Bergmann, Manuela
    Temme, Elisabeth H. M.
    Boer, Jolanda M. A.
    Agnoli, Claudia
    Ericson, Ulrika
    Stubbendorff, Anna
    Ibsen, Daniel B.
    Dahm, Christina Catherine
    Deschasaux, Melanie
    Touvier, Mathilde
    Kesse-Guyot, Emmanuelle
    Perez, Maria-Jose Sanchez
    Barranco, Miguel Rodriguez
    Tong, Tammy Y. N.
    Papier, Keren
    Knuppel, Anika
    Boutron-Ruault, Marie-Christine
    Mancini, Francesca
    Severi, Gianluca
    Srour, Bernard
    Kuhn, Tilman
    Masala, Giovanna
    Agudo, Antonio
    Skeie, Guri
    Rylander, Charlotta
    Sandanger, Torkjel M.
    Riboli, Elio
    Vineis, Paolo
    LANCET PLANETARY HEALTH, 2021, 5 (11) : E786 - E796
  • [28] Moving towards co-benefits of hydropower: Ecological efficiency evaluation based on LCA and DEA
    Liu, Xincong
    Jiang, Yaqin
    Zheng, Xiangyu
    Hou, Wenyue
    Chen, Xiehang
    Xiao, Shijiang
    Zhang, Xiaohong
    Deng, Shihuai
    Hao, Jingjing
    Luo, Huawei
    Pan, Hengyu
    ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2023, 102
  • [29] Quantifying the environment and health co-benefits of low-emission vehicles in Taiwan
    Tseng, Chao-Heng
    Chen, Ling-Ling
    Shih, Yi-Hsuan
    JOURNAL OF INTEGRATIVE ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES, 2015, 12 (01) : 39 - 48
  • [30] A scoping review of the health co-benefits of climate mitigation strategies in South America
    Fernandez-Guzman, Daniel
    Lavarello, Romina
    Yglesias-Gonzalez, Marisol
    Hartinger, Stella M.
    Rojas-Rueda, David
    LANCET REGIONAL HEALTH-AMERICAS, 2023, 26