Short term decisions for long term problems - The effect of foresight on model based energy systems analysis

被引:90
作者
Keppo, Ilkka [1 ]
Strubegger, Manfred [1 ]
机构
[1] Int Inst Appl Syst Anal, A-2361 Laxenburg, Austria
关键词
Energy modeling; Optimization model; Decision horizon; Myopic; Foresight; CLIMATE; REFLECTIONS; SCENARIOS;
D O I
10.1016/j.energy.2010.01.019
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
This paper presents the development and demonstration of a limited foresight energy system model. The presented model is implemented as an extension to a large, linear optimization model, MESSAGE. The motivation behind changing the model is to provide an alternative decision framework, where information for the full time frame is not available immediately and sequential decision making under incomplete information is implied. While the traditional optimization framework provides the globally optimal decisions for the modeled problem, the framework presented here may offer a better description of the decision environment, under which decision makers must operate. We further modify the model to accommodate flexible dynamic constraints, which give an option to implement investments faster, albeit with a higher cost. Finally, the operation of the model is demonstrated using a moving window of foresight, with which decisions are taken for the next 30 years, but can be reconsidered later, when more information becomes available. We find that the results demonstrate some of the pitfalls of short term planning, e.g. lagging investments during earlier periods lead to higher requirements later during the century. Furthermore, the energy system remains more reliant on fossil based energy carriers, leading to higher greenhouse gas emissions. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2033 / 2042
页数:10
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], ENERGY J
[2]  
[Anonymous], GGI SCEN DAT
[3]   Global energy scenarios meeting stringent CO2 constraints -: cost-effective fuel choices in the transportation sector [J].
Azar, C ;
Lindgren, K ;
Andersson, BA .
ENERGY POLICY, 2003, 31 (10) :961-976
[4]  
Barreto L., 2002, International Journal of Global Energy Issues, V17, P189
[5]  
*EIA, 2003, MOD DOC, V1
[6]  
Hedenus F, 2006, ENERG J, P109
[7]   Approaches for performing uncertainty analysis in large-scale energy/economic policy models [J].
Kann, A ;
Weyant, JP .
ENVIRONMENTAL MODELING & ASSESSMENT, 2000, 5 (01) :29-46
[8]   Robust responses to climate change via stochastic MARKAL: The case of Quebec [J].
Kanudia, A ;
Loulou, R .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1998, 106 (01) :15-30
[9]   International climate regimes: Effects of delayed participation [J].
Keppo, Ilkka ;
Rao, Shilpa .
TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2007, 74 (07) :962-979
[10]   Probabilistic temperature change projections and energy system implications of greenhouse gas emission scenarios [J].
Keppo, Kka ;
O'Neill, Brian C. ;
Riahi, Keywan .
TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2007, 74 (07) :936-961