Using Cesium-137 technique to study the characteristics of different aspect of soil erosion in the Wind-water Erosion Crisscross Region on Loess Plateau of China

被引:49
作者
Li, M
Li, ZB
Liu, PL
Yao, WY
机构
[1] YRCC, Yellow River Inst Hydraul Res, Inst Soil & Water Conservat, Zhengzhou 450003, Henan, Peoples R China
[2] Minist Water Resources, Zhengzhou 450003, Henan, Peoples R China
[3] Xian Technol Univ, Xian 710048, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
[4] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Soil & Water Conservat, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
[5] Minist Water Resources, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
关键词
wind-water Erosion Crisscross Region; slope aspect; slope position; Cs-137;
D O I
10.1016/j.apradiso.2004.06.005
中图分类号
O61 [无机化学];
学科分类号
070301 ; 081704 ;
摘要
The most serious soil erosion on Loess Plateau exists in the Wind-water Erosion Crisscross Region. In the past 20 years, the types and intensity of soil erosion and its temporal and spatial distribution were studied, but studies on the difference of soil erosion between slope aspects and slope positions in this area have no report. However, it is very important to analyze and evaluate quantitatively the characteristics of different aspects and positions of soil loss for the prevention and treatment of soil erosion in this area. The spatial pattern of net soil loss on 4 downslope transects in four aspects (east, west, south and north) on a typical Mao (round loess mound) in Liudaogou catchment in Wind-water Erosion Crisscross Region was measured in 2000 using the resident cesium-137 deficit technique. The purposes of this investigation were undertaken to determine whether or not Cs-137 measurement would give a useful indication of the extent of soil loss and their characteristics from cultivated hillsides in different slope aspect and slope position in the 66 study area. The results showed that the difference of soil erosion in different aspect was significant and the erosion rate was in this order: north > east > south > west. Compared with other areas, the difference of erosion rate between north hillside and south hillside was on the contrary, and the possible explanations could be the effect of wind erosion. Also, the percentage of wind erosion was estimated to be at least larger than 18% of total soil loss by comparing the difference of erosion amount in south hillside and north hillside. The erosion rates on different slope positions in all aspects were also different, the highest net soil loss occurred in the lower slope position, and the upper and middle slope positions were slight. The general trend of net soil loss on sloping surface was to increase in fluctuation with increasing downslope distance. (C) 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:109 / 113
页数:5
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]  
Chen YZ, 1988, MODERN EROSION HARNE
[2]  
Li X. D., 1988, SOIL WATER CONSERVAT, V8, P2
[3]  
Li Y., 2000, J SOIL WATER CONSERV, V14, P17
[4]  
Lin C., 1985, ACTA GEOGRAPHICA SIN, V40, P20
[5]  
LIU PL, 2001, ADV WATER SCI, V12, P331
[6]  
Luo, 1958, GANSU GEOGR INFORM, V2, P111
[7]  
MUSGRAVE G. W., 1947, JOUR OF SOIL AND WATER CONSERV, V2, P133
[8]   ESTIMATING SOIL EROSION FROM REDISTRIBUTION OF FALLOUT CS-137 [J].
RITCHIE, JC ;
SPRABERRY, JA ;
MCHENRY, JR .
SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 1974, 38 (01) :137-139
[9]  
SMITH D. D., 1957, Transactions of the American Geophysical Union, V38, P889
[10]  
TANG K, 1993, ENV BACKGROUND ADM W, V18, P2