Baseline heart rate-adjusted electrocardiographic triggering for coronary artery electron-beam CT angiography

被引:4
|
作者
Lu, B
Zhuang, N
Mao, SS
Child, J
Carson, S
Budoff, MJ
机构
[1] Peking Union Med Coll, Dept Radiol, Cardiovasc Inst, Beijing 100037, Peoples R China
[2] Peking Union Med Coll, FuWaiu Hosp, Beijing 100037, Peoples R China
[3] Chinese Acad Med Sci, Beijing 100037, Peoples R China
[4] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Harbor Med Ctr, Dept Med, Div Cardiol, Torrance, CA 90509 USA
[5] St Johns Cardiovasc Res Ctr, Torrance, CA 90509 USA
关键词
computed tomography (CT); angiography; electron beam; image quality; coronary vessels; stenosis or obstruction;
D O I
10.1148/radiol.2332030953
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Conventional electrocardiographic (ECG) triggering (group 1, 53 patients) was compared with baseline heart rate-adjusted ECG triggering (group 2, 54 patients) for coronary artery electron-beam computed tomographic (CT) angiography. CT angiographic data sets were compared blindly with conventional angiograms according to segment. Nonassessability of coronary artery segments was reduced from 35% in group 1 to 13% in group 2 (P <.001). More motionfree coronary artery images were obtained in group 2 than in group 1, especially in the right coronary artery (95% vs 67%, P <.001). Overall sensitivity and specificity for luminal stenosis ( greater than or equal to 50%) were 69% and 82% (group 1) and 76% and 92% (group 2) (P >.05 and P <.001, respectively). Baseline heart rate-adjusted ECG triggering improves image quality at coronary artery CT angiography for detection of coronary artery disease. (C) RSNA, 2004.
引用
收藏
页码:590 / 595
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Electron-beam CT angiography with three-dimensional reconstruction in the evaluation of coronary artery bypass grafts
    Dai, RP
    Zhang, SX
    Lu, B
    Cao, C
    He, S
    Bai, H
    Jing, BL
    ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 1998, 5 (12) : 863 - 867
  • [2] Spiral versus electron-beam CT for coronary artery calcium scoring
    Goldin, JG
    Yoon, HC
    Greaser, LE
    Heinze, SB
    McNitt-Gray, MM
    Brown, MS
    Sayre, JW
    Emerick, AM
    Aberle, DR
    RADIOLOGY, 2001, 221 (01) : 213 - 221
  • [3] Effects of scanning and reconstruction parameters on image quality in electron-beam CT angiography: Coronary Artery Phantom Study
    Lu, B
    Dai, RP
    Bai, H
    He, S
    Jiang, SL
    Zhuang, N
    Budoff, MJ
    ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2000, 7 (11) : 927 - 933
  • [4] Coronary artery: Quantitative evaluation of normal diameter determined with electron-beam CT compared with cine coronary angiography - Initial experience
    Funabashi, N
    Kobayashi, Y
    Perlroth, M
    Rubin, GD
    RADIOLOGY, 2003, 226 (01) : 263 - 271
  • [5] Coronary artery stenoses: Assessment with contrast-enhanced electron-beam CT and axial reconstructions
    Reddy, GP
    Chernoff, DM
    Adams, JR
    Higgins, CB
    RADIOLOGY, 1998, 208 (01) : 167 - 172
  • [6] Coronary arterial stent patency:: Assessment with electron-beam CT
    Pump, H
    Möhlenkamp, S
    Sehnert, CA
    Schimpf, SS
    Schmidt, A
    Erbel, R
    Grönemeyer, DHW
    Seibel, RMM
    RADIOLOGY, 2000, 214 (02) : 447 - 452
  • [7] Effects of window and threshold levels on the accuracy of three-dimensional rendering techniques in coronary artery electron-beam CT angiography
    Lu, B
    Dai, RP
    Jiang, SL
    Bal, H
    He, S
    Zhuang, N
    Sun, XG
    Budoff, MJ
    ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2001, 8 (08) : 754 - 761
  • [8] Electron-beam CT: The effect of using a correction function on coronary artery calcium quantitation
    Greaser, LE
    Yoon, HC
    Mather, RT
    McNitt-Gray, M
    Goldin, JG
    ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 1999, 6 (01) : 40 - 48
  • [9] Aortic atherosclerosis detected with electron-beam CT as a predictor of obstructive coronary artery disease
    Takasu, J
    Mao, S
    Budoff, MJ
    ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2003, 10 (06) : 631 - 637
  • [10] Assessment of coronary artery stent patency by electron-beam CT
    Knollmann, FD
    Möller, J
    Gebert, A
    Bethge, C
    Felix, R
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2004, 14 (08) : 1341 - 1347