共 61 条
Self-management of persistent neck pain: A randomized controlled trial of a multi-component group intervention in primary health care
被引:38
作者:
Gustavsson, Catharina
[1
,2
]
Denison, Eva
[2
]
von Koch, Lena
[1
,3
]
机构:
[1] Ctr Clin Res Dalarna, S-79182 Falun, Sweden
[2] Uppsala Univ, Dept Publ Hlth & Caring Sci, Uppsala, Sweden
[3] Karolinska Inst, Dept Neurobiol Care Sci & Soc, Stockholm, Sweden
关键词:
Coping;
Neck pain;
Randomized controlled trial;
Self-assessment questionnaire;
Self-management;
LOW-BACK-PAIN;
2000-2010;
TASK-FORCE;
COGNITIVE-BEHAVIORAL TREATMENT;
FEAR-AVOIDANCE MODEL;
MUSCULOSKELETAL PAIN;
APPLIED RELAXATION;
CLINICAL-TRIAL;
GENERAL-POPULATION;
DEPRESSION SCALE;
HOSPITAL ANXIETY;
D O I:
10.1016/j.ejpain.2009.10.004
中图分类号:
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号:
100217 ;
摘要:
Studies regarding self-management of persistent neck pain are infrequent. Objective: to compare treatment effects of (a) a multi-component pain and stress self-management group intervention (PASS) and (b) individually administered physical therapy (IAPT) for patients with persistent musculoskeletal tension-type neck pain. Methods: Persons seeking physical therapy treatment due to persistent tension-type neck pain at nine primary health care centers in Sweden were randomly assigned to either PASS or IAPT. Before treatment (baseline) and at 10- and 20-weeks the participants completed a self-assessment questionnaire comprising: the Self-Efficacy Scale, the Neck Disability Index, the Coping Strategies Questionnaire, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, the Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire and questions regarding neck pain, analgesics and utilization of health care. Intention-to-treat analyses were performed using repeated measures analysis of variance between baseline, 10- week and 20-week follow-up. Results: One hundred and fifty six participants were included (PASS n = 77, IAPT n = 79). On average participants receiving PASS attended seven treatment sessions and participants receiving IAPT 11 sessions over the 20-week follow-up period. Repeated measures ANCOVA showed significant time x group interaction effects for ability to control pain (p < 0: 001), self-efficacy regarding pain-interfering activities (p = 0.005), disability due to neck pain (p = 0.001) and levels of catastrophic thinking (p < 0: 001) in favour of PASS. Conclusion: PASS had a better effect than IAPT in the treatment of persistent musculoskeletal tension-type neck pain regarding coping with pain, in terms of patients' self-reported pain control, self-efficacy, disability and catastrophizing, over the 20-week follow-up. (C) 2009 European Federation of International Association for the Study of Pain Chapters. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:630.e1 / 630.e11
页数:11
相关论文