Concurrent Monte Carlo transport and fluence optimization with fluence adjusting scalable transport Monte Carlo

被引:3
作者
Yang, Y. M. [1 ]
Svatos, M. [2 ]
Zankowski, C. [2 ]
Bednarz, B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin, Wisconsin Inst Med Res, Dept Med Phys, Madison, WI 53703 USA
[2] Varian Med Syst, 3120 Hansen Way, Palo Alto, CA 94304 USA
关键词
concurrent optimization; Monte Carlo; fluence optimization; optimization concurrent Monte Carlo optimization; DOSE CALCULATION; MAGNETIC-FIELD; RADIOTHERAPY; SIMULATION; IMRT;
D O I
10.1118/1.4950711
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: The future of radiation therapy will require advanced inverse planning solutions to support single-arc, multiple-arc, and "4 pi" delivery modes, which present unique challenges in finding an optimal treatment plan over a vast search space, while still preserving dosimetric accuracy. The successful clinical implementation of such methods would benefit from Monte Carlo (MC) based dose calculation methods, which can offer improvements in dosimetric accuracy when compared to deterministic methods. The standard method for MC based treatment planning optimization leverages the accuracy of the MC dose calculation and efficiency of well-developed optimization methods, by precalculating the fluenceto dose relationship within a patient with MC methods and subsequently optimizing the fluence weights. However, the sequential nature of this implementation is computationally time consuming and memory intensive. Methods to reduce the overhead of the MC precalculation have been explored in the past, demonstrating promising reductions of computational time overhead, but with limited impact on the memory overhead due to the sequential nature of the dose calculation and fluence optimization. The authors propose an entirely new form of "concurrent" Monte Carlo treat plan optimization: a platform which optimizes the fluence during the dose calculation, reduces wasted computation time being spent on beamlets that weakly contribute to the final dose distribution, and requires only a low memory footprint to function. In this initial investigation, the authors explore the key theoretical and practical considerations of optimizing fluence in such a manner. Methods: The authors present a novel derivation and implementation of a gradient descent algorithm that allows for optimization during MC particle transport, based on highly stochastic information generated through particle transport of very few histories. A gradient rescaling and renormalization algorithm, and the concept of momentum from stochastic gradient descent were used to address obstacles unique to performing gradient descent fluence optimization during MC particle transport. The authors have applied their method to two simple geometrical phantoms, and one clinical patient geometry to examine the capability of this platform to generate conformal plans as well as assess its computational scaling and efficiency, respectively. Results: The authors obtain a reduction of at least 50% in total histories transported in their investigation compared to a theoretical unweighted beamlet calculation and subsequent fluence optimization method, and observe a roughly fixed optimization time overhead consisting of similar to 10% of the total computation time in all cases. Finally, the authors demonstrate a negligible increase in memory overhead of similar to 7-8 MB to allow for optimization of a clinical patient geometry surrounded by 36 beams using their platform. Conclusions: This study demonstrates a fluence optimization approach, which could significantly improve the development of next generation radiation therapy solutions while incurring minimal additional computational overhead. (C) 2016 Author(s). All article content, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.
引用
收藏
页码:3034 / 3048
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Parallelization of a Monte Carlo particle transport simulation code
    Hadjidoukas, P.
    Bousis, C.
    Emfietzoglou, D.
    COMPUTER PHYSICS COMMUNICATIONS, 2010, 181 (05) : 928 - 936
  • [22] Monte Carlo Study of Transport Properties in Junctionless Transistors
    Vitale, Wolfgang
    Mohamed, Mohamed
    Ravaioli, Umberto
    2010 14TH INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON COMPUTATIONAL ELECTRONICS (IWCE 2010), 2010, : 243 - 245
  • [23] New Physics Data Libraries for Monte Carlo Transport
    Augelli, M.
    Hauf, S.
    Kuster, M.
    Han, M.
    Kim, C. H.
    Pia, M. G.
    Quintieri, L.
    Seo, H.
    Saracco, P.
    Weidenspointner, G.
    Zoglauer, A.
    2010 IEEE NUCLEAR SCIENCE SYMPOSIUM CONFERENCE RECORD (NSS/MIC), 2010, : 307 - 310
  • [24] Monte Carlo analysis of electron transport in GaInAsSb material
    El Ouchdi, A. A.
    Belhadji, Y.
    Chiali, I.
    Tahir, N.
    Abdellaoui, I.
    JOURNAL OF OPTOELECTRONICS AND ADVANCED MATERIALS, 2024, 26 (9-10): : 405 - 412
  • [25] Scattering direction biasing for Monte Carlo transport calculation
    Murata, I
    Yamamoto, H
    Miyamaru, H
    Goldenbaum, F
    Filges, D
    NUCLEAR INSTRUMENTS & METHODS IN PHYSICS RESEARCH SECTION A-ACCELERATORS SPECTROMETERS DETECTORS AND ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT, 2006, 562 (02) : 845 - 848
  • [26] Optix: A Monte Carlo scintillation light transport code
    Safari, M. J.
    Afarideh, H.
    Ghal-Eh, N.
    Davani, F. Abbasi
    NUCLEAR INSTRUMENTS & METHODS IN PHYSICS RESEARCH SECTION A-ACCELERATORS SPECTROMETERS DETECTORS AND ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT, 2014, 737 : 101 - 106
  • [27] Monte Carlo simulation of charged particle transport in biomatter
    Emfietzoglou, D
    Papamichael, G
    Moscovitch, M
    PHYSICA MEDICA, 2001, 17 : 113 - 114
  • [28] Transport of sputtered atoms investigated by Monte Carlo method
    Settaouti, A.
    Settaouti, L.
    IET SCIENCE MEASUREMENT & TECHNOLOGY, 2009, 3 (04) : 263 - 270
  • [29] Review of Monte Carlo modeling of light transport in tissues
    Zhu, Caigang
    Liu, Quan
    JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL OPTICS, 2013, 18 (05)
  • [30] Monte Carlo Study of Electronic Transport in Monolayer InSe
    Gopalan, Sanjay
    Gaddemane, Gautam
    Van de Put, Maarten L.
    Fischetti, Massimo V.
    MATERIALS, 2019, 12 (24)