Patients' experiences of the use of point-of-care ultrasound in general practice - a cross-sectional study

被引:41
作者
Andersen, Camilla Aakjaer [1 ]
Brodersen, John [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Rudbaek, Torsten Rahbek [5 ]
Jensen, Martin Bach [1 ]
机构
[1] Aalborg Univ, Ctr Gen Practice, Fyrkildevej 7,13, DK-9220 Aalborg, Denmark
[2] Univ Copenhagen, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Publ Hlth, Res Unit Gen Practice, Oster Farimagsgade 5,POB 2099, DK-1014 Copenhagen, Denmark
[3] Univ Copenhagen, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Publ Hlth, Sect Gen Practice, Oster Farimagsgade 5,POB 2099, DK-1014 Copenhagen, Denmark
[4] Primary Hlth Care Res Unit, Copenhagen, Region Zealand, Denmark
[5] JB Winslows Vej 9a, DK-5000 Odense C, Denmark
关键词
General practice; Family medicine; Primary care; Point-of-Care testing; Ultrasonography; Patient-reported outcome measures; HEALTH-CARE; BEDSIDE ULTRASOUND; EXPECTATIONS; ULTRASONOGRAPHY; PRACTITIONERS; SATISFACTION; PROBABILITY; UNCERTAINTY; REASSURANCE; PHYSICIAN;
D O I
10.1186/s12875-021-01459-z
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
BackgroundThe use of point-of-care ultrasonography (POCUS) performed by general practitioners (GPs) in primary care settings is increasing. Previous studies have focused on GP-reported outcomes and little is known about patients' perspectives on the use of POCUS technology within the general practice consultation. The purpose of this study was to examine patients' experiences with POCUS in general practice within the areas where GPs have indicated that POCUS affected aspects of the consultation.MethodsA questionnaire was developed using a mixed methods sequential design. Analytical themes from interviews with GPs were converted into items in a questionnaire by the research team. The questionnaire was then further developed in several rounds of pilot tests involving both patients and GPs. The final questionnaire was used in a cohort study conducted in 18 Danish office-based general practice clinics from January 2018 to August 2018. All patients examined with POCUS were asked to complete the questionnaire on tablets immediately after their consultation.ResultsOut of 691 patients examined, 564 (81.6%) questionnaires were available for analysis. The patients reported that they were well informed about the purpose (98%) and the results (97%) of the POCUS examination; however, 29% reported that they were not informed about the difference between POCUS and an imaging-specialist's ultrasound examination. Almost all patients (99%) reported that POCUS was integrated naturally into the consultation, and 45% reported that POCUS improved the doctor-patient relationship.The majority of patients felt that they had been more thoroughly examined (92%) and taken more seriously (58%) when POCUS was part of the consultation. They felt POCUS gave them a better understanding of their health problem (82%), made them feel more secure (86%) and increased their trust in the physician's assessment (65%). Moreover, the patients reported that POCUS use improved the level of service (95%) they experienced and the quality of care (94%) in general practice.ConclusionWe found that an examination including POCUS in general practice was a positive experience overall for the majority of patients. Future research should further explore reasons for patient confidence in POCUS and whether or not the reassuring value of POCUS is valid.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03416608
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]   Use and impact of point-of-care ultrasonography in general practice: a prospective observational study [J].
Aakjaer Andersen, Camilla ;
Brodersen, John ;
Davidsen, Annette Sofie ;
Graumann, Ole ;
Jensen, Martin Bach B. .
BMJ OPEN, 2020, 10 (09)
[2]  
American Academy of Family Physicians (AAFP), 2016, AAFP REC CURR GUID F
[3]   Education of general practitioners in the use of point-of-care ultrasonography: a systematic review [J].
Andersen, Camilla Aakjaer ;
Hedegard, Henriette Sav ;
Lokkegaard, Thomas ;
Frolund, Joachim ;
Jensen, Martin Bach .
FAMILY PRACTICE, 2021, 38 (04) :484-494
[4]   Primary care physicians' access to in-house ultrasound examinations across Europe: a questionnaire study [J].
Andersen, Camilla Aakjaer ;
Jensen, Martin Bach B. ;
Toftegaard, Berit Skjodeberg ;
Vedsted, Peter ;
Harris, Michael ;
Aubin-Auger, Isabelle ;
Azuri, Joseph ;
Brekke, Matte ;
Buczkowski, Krzysztof ;
Buono, Nicola ;
Costiug, Emiliana ;
Dinant, Geert-Jan ;
Esteva, Magdalena ;
Foreva, Gergana ;
Babic, Svjetlana Gasparovic ;
Hoffman, Robert ;
Jakob, Eva ;
Koskela, Tuomas ;
Marzo-Castillejo, Merce ;
Murchie, Peter ;
Neves, Ana Luisa ;
Petek, Davorina ;
Ster, Marija Petek ;
Sawicka-Powierza, Jolanta ;
Schneider, Antonius ;
Smyrnakis, Emmanouil ;
Streit, Sven ;
Thulesius, Hans ;
Weltermann, Birgitta .
BMJ OPEN, 2019, 9 (09)
[5]   Danish general practitioners have found their own way of using point-of-care ultrasonography in primary care: a qualitative study [J].
Andersen, Camilla Aakjaer ;
Davidsen, Annette Sofie ;
Brodersen, John ;
Graumann, Ole ;
Jensen, Martin Bach .
BMC FAMILY PRACTICE, 2019, 20 (1)
[6]   Point-of-Care Ultrasound in General Practice: A Systematic Review [J].
Andersen, Camilla Aakjaer ;
Holden, Sinead ;
Vela, Jonathan ;
Rathleff, Michael Skovdal ;
Jensen, Martin Bach .
ANNALS OF FAMILY MEDICINE, 2019, 17 (01) :61-69
[7]   Wish-fulfilling medicine in practice: a qualitative study of physician arguments [J].
Asscher, Eva C. A. ;
Bolt, Ineke ;
Schermer, Maartje .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS, 2012, 38 (06) :327-331
[8]   The structure of medical decisions: uncertainty, probability and risk in five common choice situations [J].
Austin, Laurel C. ;
Reventlow, Susanne ;
Sandoe, Peter ;
Brodersen, John .
HEALTH RISK & SOCIETY, 2013, 15 (01) :27-50
[9]   National Ultrasound Curriculum for Medical Students [J].
Baltarowich, Oksana H. ;
Di Salvo, Donald N. ;
Scoutt, Leslie M. ;
Brown, Douglas L. ;
Cox, Christian W. ;
DiPietro, Michael A. ;
Glazer, Daniel I. ;
Hamper, Ulrike M. ;
Manning, Maria A. ;
Nazarian, Levon N. ;
Neutze, Janet A. ;
Romero, Miriam ;
Stephenson, Jason W. ;
Dubinsky, Theodore J. .
ULTRASOUND QUARTERLY, 2014, 30 (01) :13-19
[10]   Determinants of patient satisfaction: a systematic review [J].
Batbaatar, Enkhjargal ;
Dorjdagva, Javkhlanbayar ;
Luvsannyam, Ariunbat ;
Savino, Matteo Mario ;
Amenta, Pietro .
PERSPECTIVES IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2017, 137 (02) :89-101