Reasoning about rationality

被引:3
作者
Bjorndahl, A. [1 ]
Halpern, J. Y. [2 ]
Pass, R. [2 ]
机构
[1] Carnegie Mellon Univ, Dept Philosophy, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
[2] Cornell Univ, Dept Comp Sci, Ithaca, NY 14853 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Axiomatization; Rationality; Decision rules; Epistemic game theory; Rationalizability; BELIEF;
D O I
10.1016/j.geb.2017.03.006
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
We provide a sound and complete axiomatization for a class of logics appropriate for reasoning about the rationality of players in games, and show that essentially the same axiomatization applies to a very wide class of decision rules. We also consider games in which players may be uncertain as to what decision rules their opponents are using, and define in this context a new solution concept, D-rationalizability. (C) 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:146 / 164
页数:19
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]   Interactive epistemology II: Probability [J].
Aumann, RJ .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GAME THEORY, 1999, 28 (03) :301-314
[2]   Strong belief and forward induction reasoning [J].
Battigalli, P ;
Siniscalchi, M .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC THEORY, 2002, 106 (02) :356-391
[3]  
Bjorndahl A., 2011, THEORETICAL ASPECTS, P221
[4]  
Bjorndahl A., 2014, PRINCIPLES KNOWLEDGE, P178
[5]   RATIONALIZABILITY AND CORRELATED EQUILIBRIA [J].
BRANDENBURGER, A ;
DEKEL, E .
ECONOMETRICA, 1987, 55 (06) :1391-1402
[6]   Anomalous behavior in a traveler's dilemma? [J].
Capra, CM ;
Goeree, JK ;
Gomez, R ;
Holt, CA .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 1999, 89 (03) :678-690
[7]   A LOGIC FOR REASONING ABOUT PROBABILITIES [J].
FAGIN, R ;
HALPERN, JY ;
MEGIDDO, N .
INFORMATION AND COMPUTATION, 1990, 87 (1-2) :78-128
[8]  
Fagin R., 1995, Reasoning about Knowledge
[9]   Conservative belief and rationality [J].
Halpern, Joseph Y. ;
Pass, Rafael .
GAMES AND ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR, 2013, 80 :186-192
[10]   Iterated regret minimization: A new solution concept [J].
Halpern, Joseph Y. ;
Pass, Rafael .
GAMES AND ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR, 2012, 74 (01) :184-207