Comparison of intensity modulated proton therapy beam configurations for treating thoracic esophageal cancer

被引:4
作者
Oonsiri, Sornjarod [1 ]
Kitpanit, Sarin [1 ]
Kannarunimit, Danita [1 ]
Chakkabat, Chakkapong [1 ]
Lertbutsayanukul, Chawalit [1 ]
Prayongrat, Anussara [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Chulalongkorn Univ, King Chulalongkorn Mem Hosp, Fac Med, Dept Radiol,Div Radiat Oncol, Bangkok, Thailand
[2] 1873 Rama 4 Rd, Bangkok 10300, Thailand
来源
PHYSICS & IMAGING IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY | 2022年 / 22卷
关键词
Proton therapy; Esophageal cancer; Beam configuration; CHEMORADIOTHERAPY PLUS SURGERY; RADIATION-THERAPY; CONCURRENT CHEMOTHERAPY; RADIOTHERAPY; CARCINOMA; OUTCOMES; SELECTION; MOTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.phro.2022.04.005
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background and purpose: Specific proton-beam configurations are needed to spare organs at risk (OARs), including lungs, heart, and spinal cord, when treating esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) in the thoracic region. This study aimed to propose new intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) beam configurations and to demonstrate the benefit of IMPT compared with intensity-modulated x-ray therapy (IMXT) for treating ESCC. Material and methods: IMPT plans with three different beam angle configurations were generated on CT datasets of 25 ESCC patients that were treated with IMXT. The IMPT beam designs were two commonly-used beam configurations (anteroposterior and posterior oblique) and a recently proposed beam configuration (anterosuperior with posteroinferior). The target doses were 50-54 Gy(RBE) and 60-64 Gy(RBE) to the low-risk and high-risk target volumes, respectively. Robust optimization was applied for the IMPT plans. The differences in the dose-volume parameters between the IMXT and IMPT plans were compared. Results: With target coverage comparable to standard IMXT, IMPT had significantly lower mean doses to the OARs. IMPT with an anteroposterior opposing beam generated the lowest lung dose (mean = 7.1 Gy(RBE), V20 = 14.1%) and the anterosuperior with posteroinferior beam resulted in the lowest heart dose (mean = 12.8 Gy (RBE), V-30 = 15.7%) and liver dose (mean = 3.9 Gy(RBE), V-30 = 5.9%). For the subgroup of patients with an inferior tumor location (PTVs overlapping a part of the contoured heart), the novel beam demonstrated the optimal OARs sparing. Conclusion: Compared with IMXT, the IMPT plans significantly reduced the radiation dose to the surrounding organs when treating ESCC. IMPT beam configuration selection depends on the tumor location relative to the heart.
引用
收藏
页码:51 / 56
页数:6
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [31] Comparative Outcomes After Definitive Chemoradiotherapy Using Proton Beam Therapy Versus Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy for Esophageal Cancer: A Retrospective, Single-Institutional Analysis
    Xi, Mian
    Xu, Cai
    Liao, Zhongxing
    Chang, Joe Y.
    Gomez, Daniel R.
    Jeter, Melenda
    Cox, James D.
    Komaki, Ritsuko
    Mehran, Reza
    Blum, Mariela A.
    Hofstetter, Wayne L.
    Maru, Dipen M.
    Bhutani, Manoop S.
    Lee, Jeffrey H.
    Weston, Brian
    Ajani, Jaffer A.
    Lin, Steven H.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2017, 99 (03): : 667 - 676
  • [32] Statistical evaluation of worst-case robust optimization intensity-modulated proton therapy plans using an exhaustive sampling approach
    Yang, Zhiyong
    Li, Heng
    Li, Yupeng
    Li, Yuting
    Chang, Yu
    Li, Qin
    Yang, Kunyu
    Wu, Gang
    Sahoo, Narayan
    Poenisch, Falk
    Gillin, Michael
    Zhu, X. Ronald
    Zhang, Xiaodong
    [J]. RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2019, 14 (1)
  • [33] Proton therapy posterior beam approach with pencil beam scanning for esophageal cancer Clinical outcome, dosimetry, and feasibility
    Zeng, Yue-Can
    Vyas, Shilpa
    Dang, Quang
    Schultz, Lindsay
    Bowen, Stephen R.
    Shankaran, Veena
    Farjah, Farhood
    Oelschlager, Brant K.
    Apisarnthanarax, Smith
    Zeng, Jing
    [J]. STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE, 2016, 192 (12) : 913 - 921
  • [34] Four-dimensional computed tomography-based treatment planning for intensity-modulated radiation therapy and proton therapy for distal esophageal cancer
    Zhang, Xiaodong
    Zhao, Kuai-le
    Guerrero, Thomas M.
    Mcguire, Sean E.
    Yaremko, Brian
    Komaki, Ritsuko
    Cox, James D.
    Hui, Zhouguang
    Li, Yupeng
    Newhauser, Wayne D.
    Mohan, Radhe
    Liao, Zhongxing
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2008, 72 (01): : 278 - 287
  • [35] Dose-response relationship in locoregional control for patients with stage II-III esophageal cancer treated with concurrent chemotherapy and radiotherapy
    Zhang, Z
    Liao, ZX
    Jin, J
    Ajani, J
    Chang, JY
    Jeter, M
    Guerrero, T
    Stevens, CW
    Swisher, S
    Ho, L
    Yao, J
    Allen, P
    Cox, JD
    Komaki, R
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2005, 61 (03): : 656 - 664