Comparison of intensity modulated proton therapy beam configurations for treating thoracic esophageal cancer

被引:4
作者
Oonsiri, Sornjarod [1 ]
Kitpanit, Sarin [1 ]
Kannarunimit, Danita [1 ]
Chakkabat, Chakkapong [1 ]
Lertbutsayanukul, Chawalit [1 ]
Prayongrat, Anussara [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Chulalongkorn Univ, King Chulalongkorn Mem Hosp, Fac Med, Dept Radiol,Div Radiat Oncol, Bangkok, Thailand
[2] 1873 Rama 4 Rd, Bangkok 10300, Thailand
来源
PHYSICS & IMAGING IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY | 2022年 / 22卷
关键词
Proton therapy; Esophageal cancer; Beam configuration; CHEMORADIOTHERAPY PLUS SURGERY; RADIATION-THERAPY; CONCURRENT CHEMOTHERAPY; RADIOTHERAPY; CARCINOMA; OUTCOMES; SELECTION; MOTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.phro.2022.04.005
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background and purpose: Specific proton-beam configurations are needed to spare organs at risk (OARs), including lungs, heart, and spinal cord, when treating esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) in the thoracic region. This study aimed to propose new intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) beam configurations and to demonstrate the benefit of IMPT compared with intensity-modulated x-ray therapy (IMXT) for treating ESCC. Material and methods: IMPT plans with three different beam angle configurations were generated on CT datasets of 25 ESCC patients that were treated with IMXT. The IMPT beam designs were two commonly-used beam configurations (anteroposterior and posterior oblique) and a recently proposed beam configuration (anterosuperior with posteroinferior). The target doses were 50-54 Gy(RBE) and 60-64 Gy(RBE) to the low-risk and high-risk target volumes, respectively. Robust optimization was applied for the IMPT plans. The differences in the dose-volume parameters between the IMXT and IMPT plans were compared. Results: With target coverage comparable to standard IMXT, IMPT had significantly lower mean doses to the OARs. IMPT with an anteroposterior opposing beam generated the lowest lung dose (mean = 7.1 Gy(RBE), V20 = 14.1%) and the anterosuperior with posteroinferior beam resulted in the lowest heart dose (mean = 12.8 Gy (RBE), V-30 = 15.7%) and liver dose (mean = 3.9 Gy(RBE), V-30 = 5.9%). For the subgroup of patients with an inferior tumor location (PTVs overlapping a part of the contoured heart), the novel beam demonstrated the optimal OARs sparing. Conclusion: Compared with IMXT, the IMPT plans significantly reduced the radiation dose to the surrounding organs when treating ESCC. IMPT beam configuration selection depends on the tumor location relative to the heart.
引用
收藏
页码:51 / 56
页数:6
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [1] Motion in radiotherapy: particle therapy
    Bert, C.
    Durante, M.
    [J]. PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2011, 56 (16) : R113 - R114
  • [2] Acute Toxicities and Short-Term Patient Outcomes After Intensity-Modulated Proton Beam Radiation Therapy or Intensity-Modulated Photon Radiation Therapy for Esophageal Carcinoma: A Mayo Clinic Experience
    Bhangoo, Ronik S.
    DeWees, Todd A.
    Yu, Nathan Y.
    Ding, Julia X.
    Liu, Chenbin
    Golafshar, Michael A.
    Rule, William G.
    Vora, Sujay A.
    Ross, Helen J.
    Ahn, Daniel H.
    Beamer, Staci E.
    Jaroszewski, Dawn E.
    Hallemeier, Christopher L.
    Liu, Wei
    Ashman, Jonathan B.
    Sio, Terence T.
    [J]. ADVANCES IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2020, 5 (05) : 871 - 879
  • [3] Volumetric modulated arc therapy versus intensity-modulated proton therapy in neoadjuvant irradiation of locally advanced oesophageal cancer
    Celik, Eren
    Baus, Wolfgang
    Baues, Christian
    Schroder, Wolfgang
    Clivio, Alessandro
    Fogliata, Antonella
    Scorsetti, Marta
    Marnitz, Simone
    Cozzi, Luca
    [J]. RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2020, 15 (01)
  • [4] Does higher radiation dose lead to better outcome for non-operated localized esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients who received concurrent chemoradiotherapy? A population based propensity-score matched analysis
    Chen, Chih-Yi
    Li, Chia-Chin
    Chien, Chun-Ru
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2016, 120 (01) : 136 - 139
  • [5] Ten-Year Outcome of Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy Plus Surgery for Esophageal Cancer: The Randomized Controlled CROSS Trial
    Eyck, Ben M.
    van Lanschot, J. Jan B.
    Hulshof, Maarten C. C. M.
    van der Wilk, Berend J.
    Shapiro, Joel
    van Hagen, Pieter
    Henegouwen, Mark I. van Berge
    Wijnhoven, Bas P. L.
    van Laarhoven, Hanneke W. M.
    Nieuwenhuijzen, Grard A. P.
    Hospers, Geke A. P.
    Bonenkamp, Johannes J.
    Cuesta, Miguel A.
    Blaisse, Reinoud J. B.
    Busch, Olivier R.
    Creemers, Geert-Jan M.
    Punt, Cornelis J. A.
    Plukker, John Th M.
    Verheul, Henk M. W.
    Bilgen, Ernst J. Spillenaar
    van der Sangen, Maurice J. C.
    Rozema, Tom
    Ten Kate, Fiebo J. W.
    Beukema, Jannet C.
    Piet, Anna H. M.
    van Rij, Caroline M.
    Reinders, Janny G.
    Tilanus, Hugo W.
    Steyerberg, Ewout W.
    van der Gaast, Ate
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2021, 39 (18) : 1995 - +
  • [6] Beam angle comparison for distal esophageal carcinoma patients treated with intensity-modulated proton therapy
    Feng, Hongying
    Sio, Terence T.
    Rule, William G.
    Bhangoo, Ronik S.
    Lara, Pedro
    Patrick, Christopher L.
    Korte, Shawn
    Fatyga, Mirek
    Wong, William W.
    Schild, Steven E.
    Ashman, Jonathan B.
    Liu, Wei
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2020, 21 (11): : 141 - 152
  • [7] Mean heart dose-based normal tissue complication probability model for pericardial effusion: a study in oesophageal cancer patients
    Fukada, Junichi
    Fukata, Kyohei
    Koike, Naoyoshi
    Kota, Ryuichi
    Shigematsu, Naoyuki
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2021, 11 (01)
  • [8] Dosimetric comparison between proton beam therapy and photon radiation therapy for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma
    Hirano, Yasuhiro
    Onozawa, Masakatsu
    Hojo, Hidehiro
    Motegi, Atsushi
    Zenda, Sadatomo
    Hotta, Kenji
    Moriya, Shunsuke
    Tachibana, Hidenobu
    Nakamura, Naoki
    Kojima, Takashi
    Akimoto, Tetsuo
    [J]. RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2018, 13
  • [9] Randomized Study on Dose Escalation in Definitive Chemoradiation for Patients With Locally Advanced Esophageal Cancer (ARTDECO Study)
    Hulshof, Maarten C. C. M.
    Geijsen, Elisabeth D.
    Rozema, Tom
    Oppedijk, Vera
    Buijsen, Jeroen
    Neelis, Karen J.
    Nuyttens, Joost J. M. E.
    van der Sangen, Maurice J. C.
    Jeene, Paul M.
    Reinders, Jannie G.
    Henegouwen, Mark I. van Berge
    Thano, Adriana
    van Hooft, Jeanin E.
    van Laarhoven, Hanneke W. M.
    van der Gaast, Ate
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2021, 39 (25) : 2816 - +
  • [10] Identification of Patient Benefit From Proton Therapy for Advanced Head and Neck Cancer Patients Based on Individual and Subgroup Normal Tissue Complication Probability Analysis
    Jakobi, Annika
    Bandurska-Luque, Anna
    Stuetzer, Kristin
    Haase, Robert
    Loeck, Steffen
    Wack, Linda-Jacqueline
    Moennich, David
    Thorwarth, Daniela
    Perez, Damien
    Luehr, Armin
    Zips, Daniel
    Krause, Mechthild
    Baumann, Michael
    Perrin, Rosalind
    Richter, Christian
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2015, 92 (05): : 1165 - 1174