Short Implants and Conventional Implants in The Residual Maxillary Alveolar Ridge: A 36-Month Follow-Up Observation

被引:22
作者
Hadzik, Jakub [1 ]
Krawiec, Maciej [1 ]
Kubasiewicz-Ross, Pawel [1 ]
Prylinska-Czyzewska, Agata [2 ]
Gedrange, Tomasz [3 ]
Dominiak, Marzena [1 ]
机构
[1] Wroclaw Med Univ, Dept Dent Surg, Wroclaw, Poland
[2] Poznan Med Univ, Dept Prosthodont, Oral Rehabil Clin, Poznan, Poland
[3] Tech Univ Dresden, Dept Orthodont, Carl Gustav Carus Campus, Dresden, Germany
来源
MEDICAL SCIENCE MONITOR | 2018年 / 24卷
关键词
Maxilla; Prostheses and Implants; Sinus Floor Augmentation; SHORT DENTAL IMPLANTS; SINUS FLOOR; KERATINIZED MUCOSA; MEMBRANE PERFORATION; BONE APPOSITION; HEALTH-STATUS; PIEZOSURGERY; EXTRACTION; STABILITY; SURFACE;
D O I
10.12659/MSM.910404
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Background: Short dental implants are considered an alternative method of treatment to the maxillary sinus elevation and bone augmentation procedure at the sites of a reduced alveolar ridge height. The aim of the study was to determine the most effective therapeutic approach for a single tooth replacement in a reduced maxillary alveolar crest. Material/Methods: We enrolled 30 partially edentulous patients having a residual crestal height of 6 mm and a minimal width of the alveolar ridge of 6-7 mm: 15 patients received regular dental implants (OsseoSpeed (TM) L11 empty set4 mm and L13 empty set4 mm) and the implantation was preceded by the sinus lift procedure from a lateral window approach with the application of a xenogeneic bone graft, whereas the remaining 15 patients received short implants (OsseoSpeed (TM) L6 mm empty set 4 mm) without the sinus lift and augmentation procedure. All implants were loaded with single non-splinted crowns. Radiological examination (CBCT, RVG) was performed before the surgery and after 36 months. Primary and secondary stabilization with Osstell ISQ (R) and Periotest (R) were assessed. Results: Good results in primary and secondary stability were achieved in both systems. The marginal bone level (MBL) loss was low (0.22 +/- 0.46 mm and 0.34 +/- 0.24 mm, for short and conventional implants, respectively). No significant difference in MBL between groups was found. Conclusions: Short implants can be successfully used to support single crowns in the lateral part of the maxilla.
引用
收藏
页码:5645 / 5652
页数:8
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   SIGNIFICANCE OF THE WIDTH OF KERATINIZED MUCOSA ON THE HEALTH STATUS OF THE SUPPORTING TISSUE AROUND IMPLANTS SUPPORTING OVERDENTURES [J].
Adibrad, Mehdi ;
Shahabuei, Mohammad ;
Sahabi, Mahasti .
JOURNAL OF ORAL IMPLANTOLOGY, 2009, 35 (05) :232-237
[2]   Dimensional ridge alterations following tooth extraction.: An experimental study in the dog [J].
Araújo, MG ;
Lindhe, J .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, 2005, 32 (02) :212-218
[3]   Bone apposition around two different sandblasted and acid-etched titanium implant surfaces: a histomorphometric study in canine mandibles [J].
Bornstein, Michael M. ;
Valderrama, Pilar ;
Jones, Archie A. ;
Wilson, Thomas G. ;
Seibl, Reinhart ;
Cochran, David L. .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2008, 19 (03) :233-241
[4]   Osseointegration of short titan implants: A pilot study in pigs [J].
Botzenhart, Ute ;
Kunert-Keil, Christiane ;
Heinemann, Friedhelm ;
Gredes, Tomasz ;
Seiler, Juliane ;
Berniczei-Royko, Adam ;
Gedrange, Tomasz .
ANNALS OF ANATOMY-ANATOMISCHER ANZEIGER, 2015, 199 :16-22
[5]  
Bouri A, 2008, INT J ORAL MAX IMPL, V23, P323
[6]  
Boyan B D, 2016, Adv Dent Res, V28, P10, DOI 10.1177/0022034515624444
[7]  
BOYNE PJ, 1980, J ORAL SURG, V38, P613
[8]   Enhanced bone apposition to a chemically modified SLA titanium surface [J].
Buser, D ;
Broggini, N ;
Wieland, M ;
Schenk, RK ;
Denzer, AJ ;
Cochran, DL ;
Hoffmann, B ;
Lussi, A ;
Steinemann, SG .
JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2004, 83 (07) :529-533
[9]  
Cho S C, 2001, Pract Proced Aesthet Dent, V13, P160
[10]   A 4-Year Evaluation of the Peri-Implant Parameters of Immediately Loaded Implants Placed in Fresh Extraction Sockets [J].
Crespi, Roberto ;
Cappare, Paolo ;
Gherlone, Enrico .
JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 2010, 81 (11) :1629-1634