Is PSA Still the Best Predictor for Biochemical Recurrence after Radical Prostatectomy in High-Risk Prostate Cancer?

被引:4
作者
Akan, Serkan [1 ]
Guner, Numan Dogu [1 ]
Ediz, Caner [2 ]
Sahin, Aytac [1 ]
Verit, Ayhan [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hlth Sci, Fatih Sultan Mehmet Training & Res Hosp, Dept Urol, Istanbul, Turkey
[2] Univ Hlth Sci, Sultan Abdulhamid Han Training & Res Hosp, Dept Urol, Istanbul, Turkey
关键词
Biochemical recurrence; biochemistry; cancer; prostate cancer; prostate specific antigen; high-risk; radical prostatectomy; urology; METASTATIC PROGRESSION; MORTALITY; DEFINITION; PATHOLOGY; THERAPY; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1080/08941939.2022.2101165
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Patients with high-risk prostate cancer (PCa) experience heterogeneous oncological outcomes. In this study, we assessed the patients who underwent an RP procedure because of high-risk prostate cancer in subgroups formed according to D'Amico criteria and analyzed the effects of these criteria on biochemical recurrence (BCR) after RP. Methods We retrospectively identified high-risk non-metastatic PCa patients who underwent RP between 2006 and 2020 in our hospital. Groups were formed as follows: group 1 consisted of those with an ISUP grade 4 - 5 biopsy, group 2 consisted of those with a clinical stage T2c, group 3 consisted of those with a tPSA level >= 20 ng/ml, and group 4 consisted of those with locally advanced disease. Survival analyses were made by Kaplan-Meier test and Log Rank test. A P value Results Of all patients, 61.8% were cured by only RP and 38.2% had recurrences. Rates of BCR were significantly different among groups (P = 0.003). In group 1, group 2, group 3, and group 4, BCR rates were 30.8%, 13%, 40.8%, and 70.6%, respectively. Mean BCR-free survival was 82.47 +/- 11.64 months. In group 2, BCR-free survival was higher than that in group 3 and group 4 (P1 = 0.020 and P2 = 0.001) and in group 1, BCR-free survival was higher than that in group 4 (P = 0.016). There was no significant difference between group 3 and 4 (P > 0.05). Conclusion Despite the developments in the imaging technology, an elevated tPSA level remains to be an important predictor for BCR-free survival.
引用
收藏
页码:1733 / 1738
页数:6
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   Radical prostatectomy as primary treatment modality for locally advanced prostate cancer: A prospective analysis [J].
Berglund, Ryan K. ;
Jones, J. Stephen ;
Ulchaker, James C. ;
Fergany, Amr ;
Gill, Inderbir ;
Kaouk, Jihad ;
Klein, Eric A. .
UROLOGY, 2006, 67 (06) :1253-1256
[2]   Impact of preoperative risk on metastatic progression and cancer-specific mortality in patients with adverse pathology at radical prostatectomy [J].
Boehm, Katharina ;
Leyh-Bannurah, Sami-Ramzi ;
Rosenbaum, Clemens ;
Brandi, Laurenz S. ;
Budaeus, Lars ;
Graefen, Markus ;
Huland, Hartwig ;
Haferkamp, Axel ;
Tilki, Derya .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2017, 120 (05) :666-672
[3]   Postoperative radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy for high-risk prostate cancer: long-term results of a randomised controlled trial (EORTC trial 22911) [J].
Bolla, Michel ;
van Poppel, Hein ;
Tombal, Bertrand ;
Vekemans, Kris ;
Da Pozzo, Luigi ;
de Reijke, Theo M. ;
Verbaeys, Antony ;
Bosset, Jean-Francois ;
van Velthoven, Roland ;
Colombel, Marc ;
van de Beek, Cees ;
Verhagen, Paul ;
van den Bergh, Alphonsus ;
Sternberg, Cora ;
Gasser, Thomas ;
van Tienhoven, Geertjan ;
Scalliet, Pierre ;
Haustermans, Karin ;
Collette, Laurence .
LANCET, 2012, 380 (9858) :2018-2027
[4]   Identifying the Best Candidate for Radical Prostatectomy Among Patients with High-Risk Prostate Cancer [J].
Briganti, Alberto ;
Joniau, Steven ;
Gontero, Paolo ;
Abdollah, Firas ;
Passoni, Niccolo M. ;
Tombal, Bertrand ;
Marchioro, Giansilvio ;
Kneitz, Burkhard ;
Walz, Jochen ;
Frohneberg, Detlef ;
Bangma, Chris H. ;
Graefen, Markus ;
Tizzani, Alessandro ;
Frea, Bruno ;
Karnes, R. Jeffrey ;
Montorsi, Francesco ;
Van Poppel, Hein ;
Spahn, Martin .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2012, 61 (03) :584-592
[5]   Biopsy Core Number Represents One of Foremost Predictors of Clinically Significant Gleason Sum Upgrading in Patients With Low-risk Prostate Cancer [J].
Capitanio, Umberto ;
Karakiewicz, Pierre I. ;
Valiquette, Luc ;
Perrotte, Paul ;
Jeldres, Claudio ;
Briganti, Alberto ;
Gallina, Andrea ;
Suardi, Nazareno ;
Cestari, Andrea ;
Guazzoni, Giorgio ;
Salonia, Andrea ;
Montorsi, Francesco .
UROLOGY, 2009, 73 (05) :1087-1091
[6]   Biochemical outcome after radical prostatectomy, external beam radiation therapy, or interstitial radiation therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer [J].
D'Amico, AV ;
Whittington, R ;
Malkowicz, SB ;
Schultz, D ;
Blank, K ;
Broderick, GA ;
Tomaszewski, JE ;
Renshaw, AA ;
Kaplan, I ;
Beard, CJ ;
Wein, A .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1998, 280 (11) :969-974
[7]   Neoadjuvant hormonal therapy before radical prostatectomy in high-risk prostate cancer [J].
Devos, Gaetan ;
Devlies, Wout ;
De Meerleer, Gert ;
Baldewijns, Marcella ;
Gevaert, Thomas ;
Moris, Lisa ;
Milonas, Daimantas ;
Van Poppel, Hendrik ;
Berghen, Charlien ;
Everaerts, Wouter ;
Claessens, Frank ;
Joniau, Steven .
NATURE REVIEWS UROLOGY, 2021, 18 (12) :739-762
[8]   Poorly differentiated prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy: Long-term outcome and incidence of pathological downgrading [J].
Donohue, John F. ;
Bianco, Fernando J., Jr. ;
Kuroiwa, Kentaro ;
Vickers, Andrew J. ;
Wheeler, Thomas M. ;
Scardino, Peter T. ;
Reuter, Victor A. ;
Eastham, James A. .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2006, 176 (03) :991-995
[9]   The 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma Definition of Grading Patterns and Proposal for a New Grading System [J].
Epstein, Jonathan I. ;
Egevad, Lars ;
Amin, Mahul B. ;
Delahunt, Brett ;
Srigley, John R. ;
Humphrey, Peter A. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY, 2016, 40 (02) :244-252
[10]   The role of extended pelvic lymphadenectomy with radical prostatectomy for high-risk prostate cancer [J].
Harbin, Andrew C. ;
Eun, Daniel D. .
UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2015, 33 (05) :208-216