Social support and immunosuppressant therapy adherence among adult renal transplant recipients

被引:46
作者
Chisholm-Burns, Marie A. [1 ,2 ]
Spivey, Christina A. [1 ]
Wilks, Scott E. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Arizona, Coll Pharm, Dept Pharm Practice & Sci, Tucson, AZ 85721 USA
[2] Med Coll Georgia, Dept Med, Augusta, GA 30912 USA
[3] Louisiana State Univ, Sch Social Work, Baton Rouge, LA 70803 USA
关键词
immunosuppressant therapy; medication adherence; renal transplant recipients; social support; MEDICATION ADHERENCE; RISK-FACTORS; EMOTIONAL SUPPORT; NETWORK STRUCTURE; SELF-CARE; NONADHERENCE; PREVALENCE; NONCOMPLIANCE; BARRIERS; FAMILY;
D O I
10.1111/j.1399-0012.2009.01060.x
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The purpose of the study was to assess the relationship between social support and immunosuppressant therapy adherence among adult renal transplant recipients. Methods: A cross-sectional, survey design was employed. Mailed questionnaires were used to collect data from 81 recipients, and included the Immunosuppressant Therapy Adherence Scale(C) (ITAS(C)) and Modified Social Support Survey (MSSS-5). The correlation between ITAS(C) and MSSS-5 summary scores was assessed using the correlation coefficient (r). Analyses of the following relationships were conducted using correlation coefficients: (i) ITAS(C) summary score and individual items of the MSSS-5; and (ii) MSSS-5 summary score and individual items of the ITAS(C). A hierarchical regression was conducted. Results: The response rate was 74%. The relationship between social support and adherence was significant (r = 0.214, p < 0.05). Two MSSS-5 items (affectionate support and instrumental support pertaining to household functions) were related to ITAS(C) summary score (p < 0.05), and one ITAS(C) item (forgetfulness) was related to the MSSS-5 summary score (p < 0.05). The regression model (all MSSS-5 items) accounted for 24% of the variation in ITAS(C) summary scores. Conclusions: The findings suggest that strategies utilizing social support to address forgetfulness as well as strategies to improve affectionate support and instrumental support related to daily household functions may be useful adherence intervention tools.
引用
收藏
页码:312 / 320
页数:9
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1991, EMOTION ADAPTATION
[2]  
[Anonymous], Dictionary of cancer terms
[3]   Medication-taking behavior in a cohort of patients with inflammatory bowel disease [J].
Bernal, Isabel ;
Domenech, Eugeni ;
Garcia-Planella, Esther ;
Marin, Laura ;
Manosa, Miriam ;
Navarro, Merce ;
Cabre, Eduard ;
Gassull, Miquel A. .
DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND SCIENCES, 2006, 51 (12) :2165-2169
[4]   Does emotional support influence survival? Findings from a longitudinal study of patients with advanced cancer [J].
Burns, CM ;
Craft, PS ;
Roder, DM .
SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2005, 13 (05) :295-302
[5]   Modifiable risk factors for non-adherence to immunosuppressants in renal transplant recipients: a cross-sectional study [J].
Butler, JA ;
Peveler, RC ;
Roderick, P ;
Smith, PWF ;
Horne, R ;
Mason, JC .
NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION, 2004, 19 (12) :3144-3149
[6]   Frequency and impact of nonadherence to immunosuppressants after renal transplantation: A systematic review [J].
Butler, JA ;
Roderick, P ;
Mullee, M ;
Mason, JC ;
Peveler, RC .
TRANSPLANTATION, 2004, 77 (05) :769-776
[7]   The effectiveness of peer support groups in psychosis: a randomized controlled trial [J].
Castelein, S. ;
Bruggeman, R. ;
van Busschbach, J. T. ;
van der Gaag, M. ;
Stant, A. D. ;
Knegtering, H. ;
Wiersma, D. .
ACTA PSYCHIATRICA SCANDINAVICA, 2008, 118 (01) :64-72
[8]   Development and validation of, the immunosuppressant therapy adherence instrument (ITAS) [J].
Chisholm, MA ;
Lance, CE ;
Williamson, GM ;
Mulloy, LL .
PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2005, 59 (01) :13-20
[9]   Associations of characteristics of renal transplant recipients with clinicians' perceptions of adherence to immunosuppressant therapy [J].
Chisholm, Marie A. ;
Kwong, W. Jaqueline ;
Spivey, Christina A. .
TRANSPLANTATION, 2007, 84 (09) :1145-1150
[10]   The economic implications of non-adherence after renal transplantation [J].
Cleemput, I ;
Kesteloot, K ;
Vanrenterghem, Y ;
De Geest, S .
PHARMACOECONOMICS, 2004, 22 (18) :1217-1234