The Educational Resource Preferences and Information-Seeking Behaviors of Veterinary Medical Students and Practitioners

被引:2
作者
Garner, Bridget C. [1 ]
Hartle, Diana Y. [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Creevy, Kate E. [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Georgia, Coll Vet Med, Pathol, 501 DW Brooks Dr, Athens, GA 30602 USA
[2] Univ Georgia, Sci Lib, Res & Instruct Dept, Publ Serv, 210 DW Brooks Dr, Athens, GA 30602 USA
[3] UGA, Athens, GA USA
[4] Warnell Sch Forestry & Nat Resources, Athens, GA USA
[5] Texas A&M Univ, Internal Med, Coll Vet Med & Biomed Sci, 408 Raymond Stotzer Pkwy, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
关键词
curriculum; graduate education; resident; intern education; student affairs; LIBRARY USE; LITERACY; PREDICTORS; CURRICULUM; TEXTBOOKS; SUCCESS; PAPER;
D O I
10.3138/jvme.1017-150r1
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
The overall purpose of this study was to assess the information-seeking strategies of individuals representing different stages of veterinary training. More specifically, we conducted a survey to evaluate textbook ownership, to determine the preferred types of educational resources and why these preferences exist, and to determine if changes arise as training progresses. We asked students in the veterinary curriculum, interns, residents, and recent graduates from the University of Georgia (UGA) College of Veterinary Medicine (CVM) to participate in a confidential online survey. A total of 184 individuals participated. Respondents were grouped into one of six categories: recent graduates (n = 6), interns/residents (n = 11), fourth-year students (n = 21), third-year students (n = 46), second-year students (n = 73), and first-year students (n = 27). The results showed that veterinary students used class notes and non-veterinary search engines initially, whereas interns and residents consulted textbooks and the primary literature as their first sources to answer a veterinary question. Veterinary students had accrued textbooks over sequential years in the curriculum, but many interns and residents had almost twice as many textbooks as those who had not pursued additional training after graduation. An ANOVA showed that first-year students reported a preference for printed textbooks significantly more frequently than the third-year and fourth-year students (F-(5,F-163) = 3.265, p = .006, and p = .012, respectively). Decreased cost was most frequently cited as the factor that would increase textbook purchases.
引用
收藏
页码:470 / 480
页数:11
相关论文
共 36 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2012, 2012 Florida student textbook survey
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2000, INF LIT COMP STAND H
  • [3] Bain B, 2016, JAVMA-J AM VET MED A, V249, P285, DOI 10.2460/javma.249.3.285
  • [4] Behar-Horenstein LS, 2011, J DENT EDUC, V75, P534
  • [5] The 'digital natives' debate: A critical review of the evidence
    Bennett, Sue
    Maton, Karl
    Kervin, Lisa
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY, 2008, 39 (05) : 775 - 786
  • [6] Breivik P.S., 1989, INFORM LITERACY REVO
  • [7] BREIVIK PS, 1991, B MED LIBR ASSOC, V79, P226
  • [8] Qualified doctor and medical students' use of resources for accessing information: what is used and why?
    Brennan, Nicola
    Edwards, Sarah
    Kelly, Narcie
    Miller, Alice
    Harrower, Lucy
    Mattick, Karen
    [J]. HEALTH INFORMATION AND LIBRARIES JOURNAL, 2014, 31 (03) : 204 - 214
  • [9] Medical Subspecialty Textbooks in the 21st Century Essential or Headed for Extinction?
    Broaddus, V. Courtney
    Grippi, Michael A.
    [J]. ANNALS OF THE AMERICAN THORACIC SOCIETY, 2015, 12 (08) : 1113 - 1115
  • [10] Information Literacy: Using Computers to Connect Practice to Evidence
    Cheeseman, Susan E.
    [J]. NEONATAL NETWORK, 2012, 31 (04): : 253 - 258