Analysing Visual Landscape Complexity: Theory and Application

被引:92
作者
Ode, Asa [1 ]
Hagerhall, Caroline M. [2 ]
Sang, Neil [3 ]
机构
[1] Swedish Univ Agr Sci, Dept Landscape Planning, SE-23053 Alnarp, Sweden
[2] Norwegian Univ Life Sci, Dept Landscape Architecture & Spatial Planning, Trondheim, Norway
[3] Macaulay Inst, Aberdeen, Scotland
关键词
Landscape indicators; environmental psychology; complexity; landscape experience; visual topology; SCENIC-BEAUTY; LAND-USE; PATTERN; INDICATORS; DIVERSITY; REFLECTIONS; PERCEPTION; VEGETATION; FRAMEWORK; NETWORKS;
D O I
10.1080/01426390903414935
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The experience of landscape has, through the development of the European Landscape Convention, been highlighted as an important aspect to be incorporated in the management and planning of future landscapes. Complexity is a concept that appears in the development of indicators for several landscape functions, including visual quality and biodiversity. In environmental psychology, complexity has been used as an explanatory factor for landscape preference. This paper outlines the factors which constitute the dimensions of complexity perception and how these relate to coherence-a factor which seems to interact with complexity as regards to landscape experience. The paper further explores how indicators of landscape complexity developed within the framework of landscape ecology may be applied and used to capture relevant information on visually experienced landscape complexity. Particular attention is paid to the dimensional transitions which must be considered in order for map based indicators and perceived environmental qualities to be readily related in an applied setting. The paper concludes with some suggested models for how to link landscape indicators with landscape preference in future research.
引用
收藏
页码:111 / 131
页数:21
相关论文
共 79 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1950, PERCEPTION VISUAL WO
[2]  
[Anonymous], PRES EUR LANDSC CONV
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2015, LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY TH
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1982, Visual perception
[5]   Holistic aspects of suburban landscapes: visual image interpretation and landscape metrics [J].
Antrop, M ;
Van Eetvelde, V .
LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING, 2000, 50 (1-3) :43-58
[6]   Effects of changes in agricultural land-use on landscape structure and arable weed vegetation over the last 50 years [J].
Baessler, C ;
Klotz, S .
AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2006, 115 (1-4) :43-50
[7]   Thematic resolution matters: Indicators of landscape pattern for European agro-ecosystems [J].
Bailey, Debra ;
Herzog, Felix ;
Augenstein, Isabel ;
Aviron, Stephanie ;
Billeter, Regula ;
Szerencsits, Erich ;
Baudry, Jacques .
ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2007, 7 (03) :692-709
[8]  
Berlyne DavidE., 1974, STUDIES NEW EXPT AES, P1
[9]   Assessment of visual qualities, impacts, and behaviours, in the landscape, by using measures of visibility [J].
Bishop, ID .
ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING B-PLANNING & DESIGN, 2003, 30 (05) :677-688
[10]   SOUTH FLORIDA GREENWAYS - A CONCEPTUAL-FRAMEWORK FOR THE ECOLOGICAL RECONNECTIVITY OF THE REGION [J].
BUENO, JA ;
TSIHRINTZIS, VA ;
ALVAREZ, L .
LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING, 1995, 33 (1-3) :247-266