Digital breast tomosynthesis (3D-mammography) screening: A pictorial review of screen-detected cancers and false recalls attributed to tomosynthesis in prospective screening trials

被引:21
作者
Houssami, Nehmat [1 ]
Lang, Kristina [2 ]
Bernardi, Daniela [3 ]
Tagliafico, Alberto [4 ]
Zackrisson, Sophia [2 ]
Skaane, Per [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sydney, Sydney Med Sch, Sch Publ Hlth A27, Screening & Test Evaluat Program, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
[2] Lund Univ, Translat Med Malmo, Dept Med Radiol, Lund, Sweden
[3] Azienda Prov Serv Sanitari, Osped Trento, Dept Diagnost, UO Senol Clin & Screening Mammog, Trento, Italy
[4] Univ Genoa, Inst Anat, Dept Expt Med, Largo Rosanna Benzi 8, I-16132 Genoa, Italy
[5] Univ Oslo, Oslo Univ Hosp Ullevaal, Dept Radiol, N-0316 Oslo, Norway
关键词
Breast cancer detection; Cancer screening; Digital breast tomosynthesis; False-positive recall; Mammography; Population screening; POSITIVE DETECTION; MAMMOGRAPHY FFDM; 2D-MAMMOGRAPHY; IMPLEMENTATION; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.breast.2016.01.007
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
This pictorial review highlights cancers detected only at tomosynthesis screening and screens falsely recalled in the course of breast tomosynthesis screening, illustrating both true-positive (TP) and false-positive (FP) detection attributed to tomosynthesis. Images and descriptive data were used to characterise cases of screen-detection with tomosynthesis, sourced from prospective screening trials that performed standard (2D) digital mammography (DM) and tomosynthesis (3D-mammography) in the same screening participants. Exemplar cases from four trials highlight common themes of relevance to screening practice including: the type of lesions frequently made more conspicuous or perceptible by tomosynthesis (spiculated masses, and architectural distortions); the histologic findings (both TP and FP) of tomosynthesis-only detection; and the need to extend breast work-up protocols (additional imaging including ultrasound and MRI, and tomosynthesis-guided biopsy) if tomosynthesis is adopted for primary screening. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:119 / 134
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   BI-RADS 3 on dense breast screening ultrasound after digital mammography versus digital breast tomosynthesis [J].
Dibble, Elizabeth H. ;
Singer, Tisha M. ;
Baird, Grayson L. ;
Lourenco, Ana P. .
CLINICAL IMAGING, 2021, 80 :315-321
[32]   Pilot trial of digital breast tomosynthesis (3D mammography) for population-based screening in BreastScreen Victoria [J].
Houssami, Nehmat ;
Lockie, Darren ;
Clemson, Michelle ;
Pridmore, Vicki ;
Taylor, David ;
Marr, Georgina ;
Evans, Jill ;
Macaskill, Petra .
MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 2019, 211 (08) :357-362
[33]   Screening Mammography Performance Metrics of 2D Digital Mammography Versus Digital Breast Tomosynthesis in Women With a Personal History of Breast Cancer [J].
Chikarmane, Sona A. ;
Cochon, Laila R. ;
Khorasani, Ramin ;
Sahu, Sonia ;
Giess, Catherine S. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2021, 217 (03) :587-594
[34]   Standalone AI for Breast Cancer Detection at Screening Digital Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis:A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis [J].
Yoon, Jung Hyun ;
Strand, Fredrik ;
Baltzer, Pascal A. T. ;
Conant, Emily F. ;
Gilbert, Fiona J. ;
Lehman, Constance D. ;
Morris, Elizabeth A. ;
Mullen, Lisa A. ;
Nishikawa, Robert M. ;
Sharma, Nisha ;
Vejborg, Ilse ;
Moy, Linda ;
Mann, Ritse M. .
RADIOLOGY, 2023, 307 (05)
[35]   Not all false positive diagnoses are equal: On the prognostic implications of falsepositive diagnoses made in breast MRI versus in mammography / digital tomosynthesis screening [J].
Kuhl, Christiane K. ;
Keulers, Annika ;
Strobel, Kevin ;
Schneider, Hannah ;
Gaisa, Nadine ;
Schrading, Simone .
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH, 2018, 20
[36]   Impact on the recall rate of digital breast tomosynthesis as an adjunct to digital mammography in the screening setting. A double reading experience and review of the literature [J].
Carbonaro, Luca A. ;
Di Leo, Giovanni ;
Clauser, Paola ;
Trimboli, Rubina M. ;
Verardi, Nicola ;
Fedeli, Maria P. ;
Girometti, Rossano ;
Tafa, Alfredo ;
Bruscoli, Paola ;
Saguatti, Gianni ;
Bazzocchi, Massimo ;
Sardanelli, Francesco .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2016, 85 (04) :808-814
[37]   Can Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Replace Conventional Diagnostic Mammography Views for Screening Recalls Without Calcifications? A Comparison Study in a Simulated Clinical Setting [J].
Brandt, Kathleen R. ;
Craig, Daniel A. ;
Hoskins, Tanya L. ;
Henrichsen, Tara L. ;
Bendel, Emily C. ;
Brandt, Stephanie R. ;
Mandrekar, Jay .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2013, 200 (02) :291-298
[38]   Comparing accuracy of tomosynthesis plus digital mammography or synthetic 2D mammography in breast cancer screening: baseline results of the MAITA RCT consortium [J].
Rossi, Paolo Giorgi ;
Mancuso, Pamela ;
Pattacini, Pierpaolo ;
Campari, Cinzia ;
Nitrosi, Andrea ;
Iotti, Valentina ;
Ponti, Antonio ;
Frigerio, Alfonso ;
Correale, Loredana ;
Riggi, Emilia ;
Giordano, Livia ;
Segnan, Nereo ;
Di Leo, Giovanni ;
Magni, Veronica ;
Sardanelli, Francesco ;
Fornasa, Francesca ;
Romanucci, Giovanna ;
Montemezzi, Stefania ;
Falini, Patrizia ;
Auzzi, Noemi ;
Zappa, Marco ;
Ottone, Marta ;
Mantellini, Paola ;
Duffy, Stephen W. ;
Armaroli, Paola .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2024, 199
[39]   Meta-analysis of prospective studies evaluating breast cancer detection and interval cancer rates for digital breast tomosynthesis versus mammography population screening [J].
Houssami, Nehmat ;
Zackrisson, Sophia ;
Blazek, Katrina ;
Hunter, Kylie ;
Bernardi, Daniela ;
Lang, Kristina ;
Hofvind, Solveig .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2021, 148 :14-23
[40]   2D mammography, digital breast tomosynthesis, and ultrasound: which should be used for the different breast densities in breast cancer screening? [J].
Starikov, Anna ;
Drotman, Michele ;
Hentel, Keith ;
Katzen, Janine ;
Min, Robert J. ;
Arleo, Elizabeth Kagan .
CLINICAL IMAGING, 2016, 40 (01) :68-71