Effect of moisture content and pore water pressure buildup on resilient modulus of cohesive soils in Ohio

被引:15
|
作者
Butalia, TS [1 ]
Huang, J [1 ]
Kim, DG [1 ]
Croft, F [1 ]
机构
[1] Ohio State Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
关键词
cohesive soil; loading period; moisture content; pore water pressure; resilient modulus; residual; saturated; subgrade; unsaturated;
D O I
10.1520/STP12523S
中图分类号
TH7 [仪器、仪表];
学科分类号
0804 ; 080401 ; 081102 ;
摘要
High positive pore pressures in subgrade soils can be expected to contribute to reduction in soil strength and stiffness. Measurement of elevated pore water pressures in the subgrades of instrumented sections of Specific Pavement Studies conducted in Ohio over the past several years have raised concerns about the long-term stability of these test sections. The objective of this study was to identify the effects of moisture content and pore water pressure on the resilient modulus (M,) of unsaturated and saturated cohesive soils. Test results conducted on unsaturated cohesive soils at three different moisture contents (optimum, 2 to 4% dry of optimum, and 1 1/2 to 3% wet of optimum) showed that the resilient modulus and the effect of confining stress decreased with increasing moisture content. Laboratory tests on fully saturated cohesive soils showed that the resilient modulus of saturated soils decreased to less than half that of soil specimens tested at optimum moisture content. Residual pore water pressure increased with an increase in the deviator stress, and a decrease in the loading period. The time to dissipate residual pore water pressure, which was large in comparison to the load rate, increased with increasing deviator stress. The resilient modulus of fully saturated cohesive soil was much less under faster (I second per cycle) cyclic loading than slower (8 seconds per cycle) cyclic loading.
引用
收藏
页码:70 / 84
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Resilient modulus variations with water content
    Li, JC
    Qubain, BS
    RESILIENT MODULUS TESTING FOR PAVEMENT COMPONENTS, 2003, 1437 : 59 - 69
  • [22] Variation of Resilient Modulus with Soil Suction for Cohesive Soils in South China
    Zhang, Junhui
    Peng, Junhui
    Li, Jue
    Zheng, Jianlong
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2018, 16 (12A) : 1655 - 1667
  • [23] Variation of Resilient Modulus with Soil Suction for Cohesive Soils in South China
    Junhui Zhang
    Junhui Peng
    Jue Li
    Jianlong Zheng
    International Journal of Civil Engineering, 2018, 16 : 1655 - 1667
  • [24] Variations of Resilient Modulus of Subgrade Soils with Postcompaction Moisture Contents
    Khoury, Naji
    Brooks, Robert
    Zaman, Musharraf M.
    Khoury, Charbel N.
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD, 2009, (2101) : 72 - 81
  • [25] Threshold shear strain for cyclic pore-water pressure in cohesive soils
    Hsu, Chu-Chung
    Vucetic, Mladen
    JOURNAL OF GEOTECHNICAL AND GEOENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, 2006, 132 (10) : 1325 - 1335
  • [26] The Effect of Moisture and Fine Grain Content on the Resilient Modulus of Sandy Clay Embankment Roadbed
    Nguyen Anh Tuan
    Phan Quang Chieu
    ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY & APPLIED SCIENCE RESEARCH, 2021, 11 (03) : 7118 - 7124
  • [27] Variation of Resilient Modulus, Strength, and Modulus of Elasticity of Stabilized Soils with Postcompaction Moisture Contents
    Khoury, Naji
    Brooks, Robert
    Boeni, Santhoshini Yadav
    Yada, Damodar
    JOURNAL OF MATERIALS IN CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2013, 25 (02) : 160 - 166
  • [28] Influences of Moisture Content on Resilient Modulus of Unbound Crushed Limestone
    Phommavone, Chanpheng
    Sangpetngam, Boonchai
    ENGINEERING JOURNAL-THAILAND, 2018, 22 (04): : 39 - 49
  • [29] Prediction of Resilient Modulus Value of Cohesive and Non-Cohesive Soils Using Artificial Neural Network
    Gluchowski, Andrzej
    MATERIALS, 2024, 17 (21)
  • [30] Incorporating the Effect of Moisture Variation on Resilient Modulus for Unsaturated Fine-Grained Subgrade Soils
    Abu-Farsakh, Murad Y.
    Mehrotra, Ayan
    Mohammad, Louay
    Gaspard, Kevin
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD, 2015, (2510) : 44 - 53