THE ROLE OF VISCOSITY ESTIMATION FOR OIL-IN-GELATIN PHANTOM IN SHEAR WAVE BASED ULTRASOUND ELASTOGRAPHY

被引:37
|
作者
Zhu, Ying [1 ]
Dong, Changfeng [2 ]
Yin, Yin [1 ]
Chen, Xin [1 ]
Guo, Yanrong [1 ]
Zheng, Yi [3 ]
Shen, Yuanyuan [1 ]
Wang, Tianfu [1 ]
Zhang, Xinyu [1 ]
Chen, Siping [1 ]
机构
[1] Shenzhen Univ, Natl Reg Key Technol Engn Lab Med Ultrasound, Guangdong Key Lab Biomed Measurements & Ultrasoun, Dept Biomed Engn,Sch Med, Shenzhen 518160, Peoples R China
[2] Third Peoples Hosp Shenzhen, Dept Ultrasonog, Shenzhen, Peoples R China
[3] St Cloud State Univ, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, St Cloud, MN 56301 USA
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Shear wave; SDUV; ARFI; DMA; Elasticity; Viscosity; Oil-in-gelatin phantom; ACOUSTIC RADIATION FORCE; FATTY LIVER-DISEASE; TRANSIENT ELASTOGRAPHY; TISSUE ELASTICITY; DIFFRACTION FIELD; VIBROMETRY SDUV; MR ELASTOGRAPHY; SOFT-TISSUES; DISPERSION; VISCOELASTICITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2014.09.028
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
Shear wave based ultrasound elastography utilizes mechanical excitation or acoustic radiation force to induce shear waves in deep tissue. The tissue response is monitored to obtain elasticity information about the tissue. During the past two decades, tissue elasticity has been extensively studied and has been used in clinical disease diagnosis. However, biological soft tissues are viscoelastic in nature. Therefore, they should be simultaneously characterized in terms of elasticity and viscosity. In this study, two shear wave-based elasticity imaging methods, shear wave dispersion ultrasound vibrometry (SDUV) and acoustic radiation force impulsive (ARFI) imaging, were compared. The discrepancy between the measurements obtained by the two methods was analyzed, and the role of viscosity was investigated. To this end, four types of gelatin phantoms containing 0%, 20%, 30% and 40% castor oil were fabricated to mimic different viscosities of soft tissue. For the SDUV method, the shear elasticity mu(1) was 3.90 +/- 0.27 kPa, 4.49 +/- 0.16 kPa, 2.41 +/- 0.33 kPa and 1.31 +/- 0.09 kPa; and the shear viscosity mu(2) was 1.82 +/- 0.31 Pa.s, 2.41 +/- 0.35 Pa.s, 2.65 +/- 0.13 Pa.s and 2.89 +/- 0.14 Pa.s for 0%, 20%, 30% and 40% oil, respectively in both cases. For the ARFI measurements, the shear elasticity mu was 7.30 +/- 0.20 kPa, 8.20 +/- 0.31 kPa, 7.42 +/- 0.21 kPa and 5.90 +/- 0.36 kPa for 0%, 20%, 30% and 40% oil, respectively. The SDUV results demonstrated that the elasticity first increased from 0% to 20% oil and then decreased for the 30% and 40% oil. The viscosity decreased consistently as the concentration of castor oil increased from 0% to 40%. The elasticity measured by ARFI showed the same trend as that of the SDUV but exceeded the results measured by SDUV. To clearly validate the impact of viscosity on the elasticity estimation, an independent measurement of the elasticity and viscosity by dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA) was conducted on these four types of gelatin phantoms and then compared with SDUV and ARFI results. The shear elasticities obtained by DMA (3.44 +/- 0.31 kPa, 4.29 +/- 0.13 kPa, 2.05 +/- 0.29 kPa and 1.06 +/- 0.18 kPa for 0%, 20%, 30% and 40% oil, respectively) were lower than those by SDUV, whereas the shear viscosities obtained by DMA (2.52 +/- 0.32 Pa.s, 3.18 +/- 0.12 Pa.s, 3.98 +/- 0.19 Pa.s and 4.90 +/- 0.20 Pa.s for 0%, 20%, 30% and 40% oil, respectively) were greater than those obtained by SDUV. However, the DMA results showed that the trend in the elasticity and viscosity data was the same as that obtained from the SDUV and ARFI. The SDUV results demonstrated that adding castor oil changed the viscoelastic properties of the phantoms and resulted in increased dispersion of the shear waves. Viscosity can provide important and independent information about the inner state of the phantoms, in addition to the elasticity. Because the ARFI method ignores the dispersion of the shear waves, namely viscosity, it may bias the estimation of the true elasticity. This study sheds further light on the significance of the viscosity measurements in shear wave based elasticity imaging methods. (C) 2015 World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology.
引用
收藏
页码:601 / 609
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Does motion affect liver stiffness estimates in shear wave elastography? Phantom and clinical study
    Pellot-Barakat, Claire
    Chami, Linda
    Correas, Jean Michel
    Lefort, Muriel
    Lucidarme, Olivier
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2016, 85 (09) : 1645 - 1650
  • [42] Ultrasound shear wave elastography for the evaluation of renal pathological changes in adult patients
    Leong, Sook Sam
    Jalalonmuhali, Maisarah
    Nazri, Mohammad
    Ng, Kwan Hoong
    Vijayananthan, Anushya
    Hisham, Ranitha
    Wong, Jeannie Hsiu Ding
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2023, 96 (1144)
  • [43] Ultrasound elastography: is there a shear wave speed cutoff for pediatric liver fibrosis and inflammation?
    Phelps, Andrew
    Ramachandran, Raga
    Courtier, Jesse
    Perito, Emily
    Rosenthal, Philip
    MacKenzie, John D.
    CLINICAL IMAGING, 2017, 41 : 95 - 100
  • [44] Comparison of Simulation Methods for Ultrasound Shear Wave Elastography: FEM vs. Green's Functions
    Zhou, Shiwei
    Huang, Sheng-Wen
    Xie, Hua
    Robert, Jean-Luc
    Shamdasani, Vijay
    2014 IEEE INTERNATIONAL ULTRASONICS SYMPOSIUM (IUS), 2014, : 2304 - 2307
  • [45] Characterization of the extensor digitorum communis tendon using high-frequency ultrasound shear wave elastography
    Hsiao, Yan-Yi
    Yang, Tai-Hua
    Chen, Pei-Yu
    Hsu, Hsiu-Yun
    Kuo, Li-Chieh
    Su, Fong-Chin
    Huang, Chih-Chung
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2020, 47 (04) : 1609 - 1618
  • [46] ULTRASOUND SHEAR WAVE ELASTOGRAPHY AS A MEASURE OF PORCINE HEPATIC DISEASE IN RIGHT HEART DYSFUNCTION: A PILOT STUDY
    Hu, Jessie J.
    Qureshi, M. Yasir
    Urban, Matthew W.
    Graham, Rondell
    Yin, Meng
    Oommen, Saji
    Holst, Kimberly A.
    Edgerton, Sarah
    Vasconcelos, Luiz
    Nenadic, Ivan
    Cetta, Frank
    ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2018, 44 (11) : 2393 - 2399
  • [47] Quantitative Assessment of Normal Soft-Tissue Elasticity Using Shear-Wave Ultrasound Elastography
    Arda, Kemal
    Ciledag, Nazan
    Aktas, Elif
    Aribas, Bilgin Kadri
    Kose, Kenan
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2011, 197 (03) : 532 - 536
  • [48] Shear-Wave Sources for Soft Tissues in Ultrasound Elastography
    Giammarinaro, B.
    Zorgani, A.
    Catheline, S.
    IRBM, 2018, 39 (04) : 236 - 242
  • [49] QUANTITATIVE ASSESSMENT OF KELOIDS USING ULTRASOUND SHEAR WAVE ELASTOGRAPHY
    Guo, Ruiqian
    Xiang, Xi
    Wang, Liyun
    Zhu, Bihui
    Cheng, Shan
    Qiu, Li
    ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2020, 46 (05) : 1169 - 1178
  • [50] Magnetic resonance elastography vs. point shear wave ultrasound elastography for the assessment of renal allograft dysfunction
    Kennedy, Paul
    Bane, Octavia
    Hectors, Stefanie J.
    Gordic, Sonja
    Berger, Mark
    Delaney, Veronica
    Salem, Fadi
    Lewis, Sara
    Menon, Madhav
    Taouli, Bachir
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2020, 126