THE ROLE OF VISCOSITY ESTIMATION FOR OIL-IN-GELATIN PHANTOM IN SHEAR WAVE BASED ULTRASOUND ELASTOGRAPHY

被引:37
|
作者
Zhu, Ying [1 ]
Dong, Changfeng [2 ]
Yin, Yin [1 ]
Chen, Xin [1 ]
Guo, Yanrong [1 ]
Zheng, Yi [3 ]
Shen, Yuanyuan [1 ]
Wang, Tianfu [1 ]
Zhang, Xinyu [1 ]
Chen, Siping [1 ]
机构
[1] Shenzhen Univ, Natl Reg Key Technol Engn Lab Med Ultrasound, Guangdong Key Lab Biomed Measurements & Ultrasoun, Dept Biomed Engn,Sch Med, Shenzhen 518160, Peoples R China
[2] Third Peoples Hosp Shenzhen, Dept Ultrasonog, Shenzhen, Peoples R China
[3] St Cloud State Univ, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, St Cloud, MN 56301 USA
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Shear wave; SDUV; ARFI; DMA; Elasticity; Viscosity; Oil-in-gelatin phantom; ACOUSTIC RADIATION FORCE; FATTY LIVER-DISEASE; TRANSIENT ELASTOGRAPHY; TISSUE ELASTICITY; DIFFRACTION FIELD; VIBROMETRY SDUV; MR ELASTOGRAPHY; SOFT-TISSUES; DISPERSION; VISCOELASTICITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2014.09.028
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
Shear wave based ultrasound elastography utilizes mechanical excitation or acoustic radiation force to induce shear waves in deep tissue. The tissue response is monitored to obtain elasticity information about the tissue. During the past two decades, tissue elasticity has been extensively studied and has been used in clinical disease diagnosis. However, biological soft tissues are viscoelastic in nature. Therefore, they should be simultaneously characterized in terms of elasticity and viscosity. In this study, two shear wave-based elasticity imaging methods, shear wave dispersion ultrasound vibrometry (SDUV) and acoustic radiation force impulsive (ARFI) imaging, were compared. The discrepancy between the measurements obtained by the two methods was analyzed, and the role of viscosity was investigated. To this end, four types of gelatin phantoms containing 0%, 20%, 30% and 40% castor oil were fabricated to mimic different viscosities of soft tissue. For the SDUV method, the shear elasticity mu(1) was 3.90 +/- 0.27 kPa, 4.49 +/- 0.16 kPa, 2.41 +/- 0.33 kPa and 1.31 +/- 0.09 kPa; and the shear viscosity mu(2) was 1.82 +/- 0.31 Pa.s, 2.41 +/- 0.35 Pa.s, 2.65 +/- 0.13 Pa.s and 2.89 +/- 0.14 Pa.s for 0%, 20%, 30% and 40% oil, respectively in both cases. For the ARFI measurements, the shear elasticity mu was 7.30 +/- 0.20 kPa, 8.20 +/- 0.31 kPa, 7.42 +/- 0.21 kPa and 5.90 +/- 0.36 kPa for 0%, 20%, 30% and 40% oil, respectively. The SDUV results demonstrated that the elasticity first increased from 0% to 20% oil and then decreased for the 30% and 40% oil. The viscosity decreased consistently as the concentration of castor oil increased from 0% to 40%. The elasticity measured by ARFI showed the same trend as that of the SDUV but exceeded the results measured by SDUV. To clearly validate the impact of viscosity on the elasticity estimation, an independent measurement of the elasticity and viscosity by dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA) was conducted on these four types of gelatin phantoms and then compared with SDUV and ARFI results. The shear elasticities obtained by DMA (3.44 +/- 0.31 kPa, 4.29 +/- 0.13 kPa, 2.05 +/- 0.29 kPa and 1.06 +/- 0.18 kPa for 0%, 20%, 30% and 40% oil, respectively) were lower than those by SDUV, whereas the shear viscosities obtained by DMA (2.52 +/- 0.32 Pa.s, 3.18 +/- 0.12 Pa.s, 3.98 +/- 0.19 Pa.s and 4.90 +/- 0.20 Pa.s for 0%, 20%, 30% and 40% oil, respectively) were greater than those obtained by SDUV. However, the DMA results showed that the trend in the elasticity and viscosity data was the same as that obtained from the SDUV and ARFI. The SDUV results demonstrated that adding castor oil changed the viscoelastic properties of the phantoms and resulted in increased dispersion of the shear waves. Viscosity can provide important and independent information about the inner state of the phantoms, in addition to the elasticity. Because the ARFI method ignores the dispersion of the shear waves, namely viscosity, it may bias the estimation of the true elasticity. This study sheds further light on the significance of the viscosity measurements in shear wave based elasticity imaging methods. (C) 2015 World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology.
引用
收藏
页码:601 / 609
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparison of Shear Velocity Dispersion in Viscoelastic Phantoms Measured by Ultrasound-based Shear Wave Elastography and Magnetic Resonance Elastography
    Urban, Matthew W.
    Chen, Jun
    Ehman, Richard L.
    2017 IEEE INTERNATIONAL ULTRASONICS SYMPOSIUM (IUS), 2017,
  • [22] Accuracy of Tissue Elasticity Measurement using Shear Wave Ultrasound Elastography: A Comparative Phantom Study
    Ting, C. E.
    Yeong, C. H.
    Ng, K. H.
    Abdullah, B. J. J.
    Ting, H. E.
    WORLD CONGRESS ON MEDICAL PHYSICS AND BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2015, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2015, 51 : 252 - 255
  • [23] ON PATIENT RELATED FACTORS AND THEIR IMPACT ON ULTRASOUND-BASED SHEAR WAVE ELASTOGRAPHY OF THE LIVER
    Byenfeldt, Marie
    Elvin, Anders
    Fransson, Per
    ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2018, 44 (08) : 1606 - 1615
  • [24] Shear wave elastography plaque characterization with mechanical testing validation: a phantom study
    Widman, E.
    Maksuti, E.
    Larsson, D.
    Urban, M. W.
    Bjallmark, A.
    Larsson, M.
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2015, 60 (08) : 3151 - 3174
  • [25] Performance Assessment of Motion Tracking Methods in Ultrasound-based Shear Wave Elastography
    He, Tingting
    Peng, Bo
    Chen, Pengcheng
    Jiang, Jingfeng
    2020 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SYSTEMS, MAN, AND CYBERNETICS (SMC), 2020, : 3643 - 3648
  • [26] Three-dimensional shear wave elastography on conventional ultrasound scanners with external vibration
    Huang, Chengwu
    Song, Pengfei
    Mellema, Daniel C.
    Gong, Ping
    Lok, U-Wai
    Tang, Shanshan
    Ling, Wenwu
    Meixner, Duane D.
    Urban, Matthew W.
    Manduca, Armando
    Greenleaf, James F.
    Chen, Shigao
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2020, 65 (21)
  • [27] Shear wave speed measurement bias in a viscoelastic phantom across six ultrasound elastography systems: a comparative study with transient elastography and magnetic resonance elastography
    Riwa Kishimoto
    Mikio Suga
    Masashi Usumura
    Hiroko Iijima
    Masahiro Yoshida
    Hiroyuki Hachiya
    Tsuyoshi Shiina
    Makoto Yamakawa
    Kei Konno
    Takayuki Obata
    Tadashi Yamaguchi
    Journal of Medical Ultrasonics, 2022, 49 : 143 - 152
  • [28] Viscosity measurement based on shear-wave laser speckle contrast analysis
    Cheng, Yi
    Li, Sinan
    Eckersley, Robert J.
    Elson, Daniel S.
    Tang, Meng-Xing
    JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL OPTICS, 2013, 18 (12)
  • [29] Analytical Minimization-Based Regularized Subpixel Shear-Wave Tracking for Ultrasound Elastography
    Horeh, Mahmoud Derakhshan
    Asif, Amir
    Rivaz, Hassan
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ULTRASONICS FERROELECTRICS AND FREQUENCY CONTROL, 2019, 66 (02) : 285 - 296
  • [30] Imaging Feedback of Histotripsy Treatments Using Ultrasound Shear Wave Elastography
    Wang, Tzu-Yin
    Hall, Timothy L.
    Xu, Zhen
    Fowlkes, J. Brian
    Cain, Charles A.
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ULTRASONICS FERROELECTRICS AND FREQUENCY CONTROL, 2012, 59 (06) : 1167 - 1181