Bi-weekly administration of gemcitabine plus vinorelbine in elderly patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: Multicenter phase II trial

被引:4
|
作者
Araya, Tomoyuki
Kasahara, Kazuo
Kimura, Hideharu
Shibata, Kazuhiko
Kita, Toshiyuki
Shirasaki, Hiroki
Hara, Johsuke
Yoshimi, Yuzo
Sone, Takashi
Oribe, Yoshitaka
Nobata, Kouichi
Nishi, Kouichi
Fujimura, Masaki
Nakao, Shinji
机构
[1] Kanazawa Univ Hosp, Kanazawa, Ishikawa 9208641, Japan
[2] Kouseiren Takaoka Hosp, Takaoka, Toyama 9338555, Japan
[3] Kanazawa Med Ctr, Kanazawa, Ishikawa 9208650, Japan
[4] Fukui Saiseikai Hosp, Fukui 9188503, Japan
[5] Kaga Municipal Hosp, Kaga 9228622, Japan
[6] Ishikawa Prefectural Cent Hosp, Kanazawa, Ishikawa 9208530, Japan
关键词
elderly patients; non-small-cell lung caner; bi-weekly schedule; gemcitabine; vinorelbine; phase II trial; PREVIOUSLY TREATED PATIENTS; CHEMOTHERAPY; GEFITINIB; OLDER;
D O I
10.1016/j.lungcan.2007.01.001
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: Gemcitabine (GEM) and vinorelbine (VNR) have demonstrated activity as a first-line treatment in elderly patients with advanced non-small-cell Lung cancer (NSCLC). We conducted a multicenter phase II trial to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of bi-weekly administration of GEM plus VNR in elderly patients with advanced NSCLC. Patients and methods: Forty-six chemotherapy-naive elderly (age: >= 70 years) NSCLC patients were enrolled. Patients were eligible if they had histologically or cytologically confirmed unresectable NSCLC with measurable and/or assessable disease. Patients received GEM (1000 mg/m(2)) and VNR (25 mg/m(2)) every 2 weeks. Results: The objective response rate of this treatment was 22.7% (95% confidence interval (CI), 10.3-35.1%), median survival time was 310 days, and median time to progression was 133 days. The one-year survival rate was 40.9% (95% Cl, 26.3-55.4%), and most adverse events were mild. Only three (6.8%) patients needed to omit GEM because of grade 4 neutropenia or due to physician judgment. No patients suffered treatment-related death. Conclusions: Bi-weekly administration of GEM plus VNR in elderly patients was an effective, feasible and well-tolerated treatment schedule. (c) 2007 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:371 / 376
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A phase II trial of induction gemcitabine and vinorelbine followed by concurrent vinorelbine and radiotherapy in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer
    Leong, Swan Swan
    Fong, Kam Weng
    Lim, Wan Teck
    Toh, Chee Keong
    Yap, Swee Peng
    Hee, Siew Wan
    Tan, Eng Huat
    LUNG CANCER, 2010, 67 (03) : 325 - 329
  • [32] Randomized phase II trial of gemcitabine plus weekly versus three-weekly paclitaxel in previously untreated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer
    Belani, C. P.
    Dakhil, S.
    Waterhouse, D. M.
    Desch, C. E.
    Rooney, D. K.
    Clark, R. H.
    Monberg, M. J.
    Ye, Z.
    Obasaju, C. K.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2007, 18 (01) : 110 - 115
  • [33] First line chemotherapy with planned sequential administration of gemcitabine followed by docetaxel in elderly advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients: a multicenter phase II study
    C Tibaldi
    E Vasile
    A Antonuzzo
    R Di Marsico
    A Fabbri
    F Innocenti
    G Tartarelli
    D Amoroso
    M Andreuccetti
    M Lo Dico
    A Falcone
    British Journal of Cancer, 2008, 98 : 558 - 563
  • [34] A phase II trial of weekly chemotherapy with paclitaxel plus gemcitabine as a first-line treatment in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer
    Kiyoshi Mori
    Hiroyuki Kobayashi
    Yukari Kamiyama
    Yasuhiko Kano
    Tetsuro Kodama
    Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology, 2009, 64 : 73 - 78
  • [35] Phase II study of gemcitabine and carboplatin in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer
    Lin Run Wang
    Ming Zhu Huang
    Guo Bing Zhang
    Nong Xu
    Xiu Hua Wu
    Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology, 2007, 60 : 601 - 607
  • [36] Gemcitabine with either paclitaxel or vinorelbine vs paclitaxel or gemcitabine alone for elderly or unfit advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients
    P Comella
    G Frasci
    P Carnicelli
    B Massidda
    F Buzzi
    G Filippelli
    L Maiorino
    M Guida
    N Panza
    S Mancarella
    R Cioffi
    British Journal of Cancer, 2004, 91 : 489 - 497
  • [37] Phase II study of gemcitabine and carboplatin in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer
    Wang, Lin Run
    Huang, Ming Zhu
    Zhang, Guo Bing
    Xu, Nong
    Wu, Xiu Hua
    CANCER CHEMOTHERAPY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 2007, 60 (04) : 601 - 607
  • [38] Phase II Randomized Study of Vandetanib Plus Gemcitabine or Gemcitabine Plus Placebo as First-Line Treatment of Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer in Elderly Patients
    Gridelli, Cesare
    Novello, Silvia
    Zilembo, Nicoletta
    Luciani, Andrea
    Favaretto, Adolfo Gino
    De Marinis, Filippo
    Genestreti, Giovenzio
    Crino, Lucio
    Grossi, Francesco
    Caffo, Orazio
    Ferrau, Francesco
    Cruciani, Giorgio
    Brandes, Alba Ariela
    Galetta, Domenico
    Barni, Sandro
    Fasola, Gianpiero
    Cerea, Giulio
    Ferrari, Silvia
    Iannacone, Claudio
    Ciardiello, Fortunato
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC ONCOLOGY, 2014, 9 (05) : 733 - 737
  • [39] Gemcitabine plus vinorelbine in advanced non small cell lung cancer: a phase II study of three different doses
    Gridelli, C
    Frontini, L
    Perrone, F
    Gallo, C
    Gulisano, M
    Cigolari, S
    Castiglione, F
    Robbiati, SF
    Gasparini, G
    Ianniello, GP
    Farris, A
    Locatelli, MC
    Felletti, R
    Piazza, E
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2000, 83 (06) : 707 - 714
  • [40] Gemcitabine with either paclitaxel or vinorelbine vs paclitaxel or gemcitabine alone for elderly or unfit advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients
    Comella, P
    Frasci, G
    Carnicelli, P
    Massidda, B
    Buzzi, F
    Filippelli, G
    Maiorino, L
    Guida, M
    Panza, N
    Mancarella, S
    Cioffi, R
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2004, 91 (03) : 489 - 497