The impact of structural empowerment on individual well-being and performance: Taking agent preferences, self-efficacy and operational constraints into account

被引:64
作者
Biron, Michal [3 ]
Bamberger, Peter [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Technion Israel Inst Technol, William Davidson Fac Ind Engn & Management, IL-32000 Haifa, Israel
[2] Cornell Univ, Sch Ind & Labor Relat, Ithaca, NY 14853 USA
[3] Univ Haifa, Grad Sch Management, IL-31999 Haifa, Israel
关键词
autonomy; burnout; call center; customer service agents; empowerment; job design; PSYCHOLOGICAL EMPOWERMENT; PROCEDURAL JUSTICE; FUTURE-RESEARCH; JOB REDESIGN; CALL CENTERS; SATISFACTION; MODEL; MANAGEMENT; DETERMINANTS; BEHAVIOR;
D O I
10.1177/0018726709337039
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
We integrate psychological and socio-structural perspectives on empowerment by examining: a) the impact of actual structural empowerment initiatives (as opposed to perceptions of such empowering acts) aimed at enhancing employee influence over which tasks to perform (as opposed to how to perform them) on employee well-being and performance, b) the degree to which self-efficacy mediates these effects, and c) the extent to which, by applying such initiatives more selectively, performance-related empowerment effects may be amplified. Results of a simulation-based experiment indicate that while granting decision latitude over which tasks to perform has beneficial effects on both individual performance and well-being, self-efficacy partially mediates the effects only on the latter. Results also indicate that the direct performance-related effects of such interventions may be further increased without any significant decline in employee wellbeing to the extent that such structural empowerment is applied more selectively and offered as a performance-based incentive.
引用
收藏
页码:163 / 191
页数:29
相关论文
共 84 条
[1]   To empower or not to empower your sales force? An empirical examination of the influence of leadership empowerment behavior on customer satisfaction and performance [J].
Ahearne, M ;
Mathieu, J ;
Rapp, A .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2005, 90 (05) :945-955
[2]  
Aksin ZN, 2007, PROD OPER MANAG, V16, P665, DOI 10.1111/j.1937-5956.2007.tb00288.x
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1992, USES DISCRETION
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1979, Quasi-experimentation: Design analysis issues for field settings
[5]  
Bamberger P., 2000, HUMAN RESOURCE STRAT
[6]   THE EXPLANATORY AND PREDICTIVE SCOPE OF SELF-EFFICACY THEORY [J].
BANDURA, A .
JOURNAL OF SOCIAL AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1986, 4 (03) :359-373
[7]   Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective [J].
Bandura, A .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 52 :1-26
[8]   DESIGN AND DEVOTION - SURGES OF RATIONAL AND NORMATIVE IDEOLOGIES OF CONTROL IN MANAGERIAL DISCOURSE [J].
BARLEY, SR ;
KUNDA, G .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 1992, 37 (03) :363-399
[9]   THE MODERATOR MEDIATOR VARIABLE DISTINCTION IN SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGICAL-RESEARCH - CONCEPTUAL, STRATEGIC, AND STATISTICAL CONSIDERATIONS [J].
BARON, RM ;
KENNY, DA .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1986, 51 (06) :1173-1182
[10]  
Barron P, 2007, J HOSP LEIS SPORT TO, V6, P40