Sensitivity analysis and the expected value of perfect information

被引:225
作者
Felli, JC
Hazen, GB
机构
[1] USN, Postgrad Sch, DRMI, Monterey, CA 93943 USA
[2] Northwestern Univ, Dept Ind Engn & Management Sci, Evanston, IL 60208 USA
关键词
sensitivity analysis; expected value of perfect information;
D O I
10.1177/0272989X9801800117
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Measures of decision sensitivity that have been applied to medical decision problems were examined. Traditional threshold proximity methods have recently been supplemented by probabilistic sensitivity analysis, and by entropy-based measures of sensitivity. The authors propose a fourth measure based upon the expected value of perfect information (EVPI), which they believe superior both methodologically and pragmatically. Both the traditional and the newly suggested sensitivity measures focus entirely on the likelihood of decision change without attention to corresponding changes in payoff, which are often small. Consequently, these measures can dramatically overstate problem sensitivity. EVPI, on the other hand, incorporates both the probability of a decision change and the marginal benefit of such a change into a single measure, and therefore provides a superior picture of problem sensitivity. To lend support to this contention, the authors revisit three problems from the literature and compare the results of sensitivity analyses using probabilistic, entropy-based, and EVPI-based measures.
引用
收藏
页码:95 / 109
页数:15
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]  
Bernardo Jose M, 2009, BAYESIAN THEORY, V405
[2]  
Brown R. V., 1990, Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, V3, P213, DOI 10.1002/bdm.3960030306
[3]   DOES A REACTOR NEED A SAFETY BACKFIT - CASE-STUDY ON COMMUNICATING DECISION AND RISK ANALYSIS INFORMATION TO MANAGERS [J].
BROWN, RV ;
ULVILA, JW .
RISK ANALYSIS, 1988, 8 (02) :271-282
[5]  
CONNELLY DP, 1989, ARCH PATHOL LAB MED, V113, P750
[6]   PROBABILISTIC SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS-METHODS FOR GENERAL DECISION-MODELS [J].
CRITCHFIELD, GC ;
WILLARD, KE ;
CONNELLY, DP .
COMPUTERS AND BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH, 1986, 19 (03) :254-265
[7]   PROBABILISTIC ANALYSIS OF DECISION TREES USING MONTE-CARLO SIMULATION [J].
CRITCHFIELD, GC ;
WILLARD, KE .
MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 1986, 6 (02) :85-92
[8]   QUANTIFYING UNCERTAINTY IN MEDICAL DECISIONS [J].
DITTUS, RS ;
ROBERTS, SD ;
WILSON, JR .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 1989, 14 (03) :A23-A28
[9]  
DITTUS RS, 1992, P 1992 WINT SIM C, P1050
[10]  
Doubilet P, 1985, Med Decis Making, V5, P157, DOI 10.1177/0272989X8500500205