Work related shoulder disorders: quantitative exposure-response relations with reference to arm posture

被引:146
作者
Svendsen, SW
Bonde, JP
Mathiassen, SE
Stengaard-Pedersen, K
Frich, LH
机构
[1] Aarhus Univ Hosp, Dept Occupat Med, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark
[2] Univ Lund Hosp, Dept Occupat & Environm Med, Lund, Sweden
[3] Aarhus Univ Hosp, Dept Rheumatol, Aarhus, Denmark
[4] Odense Univ Hosp, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Odense, Denmark
关键词
D O I
10.1136/oem.2003.010637
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Aims: To determine quantitative exposure-response relations between work with highly elevated arms and supraspinatus tendinitis, shoulder pain with disability, and shoulder pain without disability. Methods: A cross sectional study was conducted in a historical cohort of 1886 males from three occupational groups. Exposure measurements were performed for four consecutive working days in a random sample of 72 currently employed subjects. Individual work histories were obtained by questionnaire and register data. Health status was ascertained by physical examination blinded towards exposure and symptoms. Data were analysed by generalised estimating equation and multiple logistic regression with adjustment for potential confounders. Results: For current upper arm elevation above 90degrees, a duration increment of 1% of the daily working hours was associated with odds ratios of 1.23 (95% CI 1.10 to 1.39) for supraspinatus tendinitis, 1.16 ( 95% CI 1.08 to 1.24) for shoulder pain with disability, and 1.08 ( 95% CI 1.04 to 1.13) for shoulder pain without disability. The outcomes were not related to duration of employment in one of the three trades. Conclusions: Quantitative exposure-response relations were established between current work with highly elevated arms and clinically verified shoulder disorders. Substantial long term cumulative effects were not shown. A potential for primary prevention was revealed.
引用
收藏
页码:844 / 853
页数:10
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]   Effect of measurement error on epidemiological studies of environmental and occupational exposures [J].
Armstrong, BG .
OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL MEDICINE, 1998, 55 (10) :651-656
[2]   A CONCEPTUAL-MODEL FOR WORK-RELATED NECK AND UPPER-LIMB MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS [J].
ARMSTRONG, TJ ;
BUCKLE, P ;
FINE, LJ ;
HAGBERG, M ;
JONSSON, B ;
KILBOM, A ;
KUORINKA, IAA ;
SILVERSTEIN, BA ;
SJOGAARD, G ;
VIIKARIJUNTURA, ERA .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF WORK ENVIRONMENT & HEALTH, 1993, 19 (02) :73-84
[3]  
Bernard B.P., 1997, MUSCULOSKELETAL DISO
[4]   CLINICAL AND ERGONOMIC FACTORS IN PROLONGED SHOULDER PAIN AMONG INDUSTRIAL-WORKERS [J].
BJELLE, A ;
HAGBERG, M ;
MICHAELSSON, G .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF WORK ENVIRONMENT & HEALTH, 1979, 5 (03) :205-210
[5]   Prognosis of shoulder tendonitis in repetitive work: a follow up study in a cohort of Danish industrial and service workers [J].
Bonde, JP ;
Mikkelsen, S ;
Andersen, JH ;
Fallentin, N ;
Baelum, J ;
Svendsen, SW ;
Thomsen, JF ;
Frost, P ;
Thomsen, G ;
Overgaard, E ;
Kaergaard, A .
OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL MEDICINE, 2003, 60 (09) :E8
[6]   Are psychosocial factors, risk factors for symptoms and signs of the shoulder, elbow, or hand/wrist?: A review of the epidemiological literature [J].
Bongers, PM ;
Kremer, AM ;
ter Laak, J .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL MEDICINE, 2002, 41 (05) :315-342
[7]   PSYCHOSOCIAL FACTORS AT WORK AND MUSCULOSKELETAL DISEASE [J].
BONGERS, PM ;
DEWINTER, CR ;
KOMPIER, MAJ ;
HILDEBRANDT, VH .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF WORK ENVIRONMENT & HEALTH, 1993, 19 (05) :297-312
[8]   Diagnostic values of clinical diagnostic tests in subacromial impingement syndrome [J].
Çalis, M ;
Akgün, K ;
Birtane, M ;
Karacan, I ;
Çalis, H ;
Tüzün, F .
ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 2000, 59 (01) :44-47
[9]  
CONSTANT CR, 1987, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P160
[10]   Work environment and neck and shoulder pain:: the influence of exposure time.: Results from a population based case-control study [J].
Fredriksson, K ;
Alfredsson, L ;
Ahlberg, G ;
Josephson, M ;
Kilbom, Å ;
Hjelm, EW ;
Wiktorin, C ;
Vingård, E .
OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL MEDICINE, 2002, 59 (03) :182-188