共 50 条
Commonalities among dental patient-reported outcomes (dPROs)-A Delphi consensus study
被引:7
|作者:
Chanthavisouk, Phonsuda
[1
]
John, Mike T. I.
[2
,3
]
Paulson, Danna I.
[4
]
Pattanaik, Swaha I.
[2
]
机构:
[1] Univ Minnesota, Sch Dent, Dept Primary Dent Care, Div Dent Therapy, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
[2] Univ Minnesota, Sch Dent, Dept Diagnost & Biol Sci, Div Oral Med Diag & Radiol, Minneapolis, MN USA
[3] Univ Minnesota, Sch Publ Hlth, Div Epidemiol & Community Hlth, Minneapolis, MN USA
[4] Univ Minnesota, Sch Dent, Dept Primary Dent Care, Div Dent Hyg, Minneapolis, MN USA
来源:
PLOS ONE
|
2022年
/
17卷
/
06期
基金:
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词:
IMPACT;
QUESTIONNAIRE;
RELIABILITY;
VALIDATION;
VALIDITY;
NUMBER;
SCALE;
PAIN;
D O I:
10.1371/journal.pone.0268750
中图分类号:
O [数理科学和化学];
P [天文学、地球科学];
Q [生物科学];
N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号:
07 ;
0710 ;
09 ;
摘要:
Improvement of patients' oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) is the main goal of oral health care professionals. However, OHRQoL is not a homogenous construct and how to assess it is challenging because of the large number of currently available instruments. Investigating available instruments and what they have in common would be necessary for consolidation and standardization of these instruments into a smaller set of tools. If the OHRQoL dimensions including Oral Function, Orofacial Pain, Orofacial Appearance, and Psychosocial Impact are the fundamental building blocks of the dental patient's oral health experience, then these dimensions should be measured by generic multi-item dPROMs. In this study, a panel of 11 international dentists use the Delphi consensus process to determine how well 20 of these instruments measured the four OHRQoL dimensions. All 20 dPROMs questionnaires assessed at least one OHRQoL dimension while all four OHRQoL dimensions were measured by at least one dPROM instrument, i.e., the four OHRQoL dimensions were essential components of the patient's oral health experience. This shows that the currently available generic multi-item dPROMs have a lot in common, in that they share Oral Function, Orofacial Pain, Orofacial Appearance, and Psychosocial Impact as targeted dimensions. Based on these commonalities, it is plausible and desirable to move towards a single four-dimensional metric to assess oral health impact in all clinical, community-based, and research settings. This step is necessary to advance evidence-based dentistry and value-based oral health care.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文