New Trends in Olefin Production

被引:677
作者
Amghizar, Ismael [1 ]
Vandewalle, Laurien A. [1 ]
Van Geem, Kevin M. [1 ]
Marin, Guy B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ghent, Chem Technol Lab, B-9052 Ghent, Belgium
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
Olefin production; Steam cracking; Methane conversion; Shale gas; CO2; emissions; METHANOL-TO-HYDROCARBONS; FISCHER-TROPSCH PROCESS; CARBON-DIOXIDE CAPTURE; FLUIDIZED-BED REACTOR; CATALYTIC MATERIALS; SHALE GAS; TEMPERATURE; CONVERSION; COAL; OXIDATION;
D O I
10.1016/J.ENG.2017.02.006
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Most olefins (e.g., ethylene and propylene) will continue to be produced through steam cracking (SC) of hydrocarbons in the coming decade. In an uncertain commodity market, the chemical industry is investing very little in alternative technologies and feedstocks because of their current lack of economic viability, despite decreasing crude oil reserves and the recognition of global warming. In this perspective, some of the most promising alternatives are compared with the conventional SC process, and the major bottlenecks of each of the competing processes are highlighted. These technologies emerge especially from the abundance of cheap propane, ethane, and methane from shale gas and stranded gas. From an economic point of view, methane is an interesting starting material, if chemicals can be produced from it. The huge availability of crude oil and the expected substantial decline in the demand for fuels imply that the future for proven technologies such as Fischer-Tropsch synthesis (FTS) or methanol to gasoline is not bright. The abundance of cheap ethane and the large availability of crude oil, on the other hand, have caused the SC industry to shift to these two extremes, making room for the on-purpose production of light olefins, such as by the catalytic dehydrogenation of propane. (C) 2017 THE AUTHORS. Published by Elsevier LTD on behalf of the Chinese Academy of Engineering and Higher Education Press Limited Company.
引用
收藏
页码:171 / 178
页数:8
相关论文
共 72 条
[21]  
Foster J, 2013, CAN SHALE GALE SAVE
[22]   Revisiting the oxidative coupling of methane to ethylene in the golden period of shale gas: A review [J].
Galadima, Ahmad ;
Muraza, Oki .
JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL AND ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY, 2016, 37 :1-13
[23]   Catalysts for Production of Lower Olefins from Synthesis Gas: A Review [J].
Galvis, Hirsa M. Torres ;
de Jong, Krijn P. .
ACS CATALYSIS, 2013, 3 (09) :2130-2149
[24]   Supported Iron Nanoparticles as Catalysts for Sustainable Production of Lower Olefins [J].
Galvis, Hirsa M. Torres ;
Bitter, Johannes H. ;
Khare, Chaitanya B. ;
Ruitenbeek, Matthijs ;
Dugulan, A. Iulian ;
de Jong, Krijn P. .
SCIENCE, 2012, 335 (6070) :835-838
[25]   Feedstock recycling of polymer wastes [J].
Garforth, AA ;
Ali, S ;
Hernández-Martínez, J ;
Akah, A .
CURRENT OPINION IN SOLID STATE & MATERIALS SCIENCE, 2004, 8 (06) :419-425
[26]   Oxidative coupling of methane over alkali chloride-Mn-Na2WO4/SiO2 catalysts: Promoting effect of molten alkali chloride [J].
Hiyoshi, Norihito ;
Ikeda, Takuji .
FUEL PROCESSING TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 133 :29-34
[27]   Syngas by catalytic partial oxidation of methane on rhodium: Mechanistic conclusions from spatially resolved measurements and numerical simulations [J].
Horn, R. ;
Williams, K. A. ;
Degenstein, N. J. ;
Schmidt, L. D. .
JOURNAL OF CATALYSIS, 2006, 242 (01) :92-102
[28]   Structure Sensitivity of La2O2CO3 Catalysts in the Oxidative Coupling of Methane [J].
Hou, Yu-Hui ;
Han, Wei-Chen ;
Xia, Wen-Sheng ;
Wan, Hui-Lin .
ACS CATALYSIS, 2015, 5 (03) :1663-1674
[29]   Exploiting shape effects of La2O3 nanocatalysts for oxidative coupling of methane reaction [J].
Huang, Ping ;
Zhao, Yonghui ;
Zhang, Jun ;
Zhu, Yan ;
Sun, Yuhan .
NANOSCALE, 2013, 5 (22) :10844-10848
[30]   OXIDATIVE DIMERIZATION OF METHANE OVER A LITHIUM-PROMOTED MAGNESIUM-OXIDE CATALYST [J].
ITO, T ;
WANG, JX ;
LIN, CH ;
LUNSFORD, JH .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 1985, 107 (18) :5062-5068