New Trends in Olefin Production

被引:677
作者
Amghizar, Ismael [1 ]
Vandewalle, Laurien A. [1 ]
Van Geem, Kevin M. [1 ]
Marin, Guy B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ghent, Chem Technol Lab, B-9052 Ghent, Belgium
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
Olefin production; Steam cracking; Methane conversion; Shale gas; CO2; emissions; METHANOL-TO-HYDROCARBONS; FISCHER-TROPSCH PROCESS; CARBON-DIOXIDE CAPTURE; FLUIDIZED-BED REACTOR; CATALYTIC MATERIALS; SHALE GAS; TEMPERATURE; CONVERSION; COAL; OXIDATION;
D O I
10.1016/J.ENG.2017.02.006
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Most olefins (e.g., ethylene and propylene) will continue to be produced through steam cracking (SC) of hydrocarbons in the coming decade. In an uncertain commodity market, the chemical industry is investing very little in alternative technologies and feedstocks because of their current lack of economic viability, despite decreasing crude oil reserves and the recognition of global warming. In this perspective, some of the most promising alternatives are compared with the conventional SC process, and the major bottlenecks of each of the competing processes are highlighted. These technologies emerge especially from the abundance of cheap propane, ethane, and methane from shale gas and stranded gas. From an economic point of view, methane is an interesting starting material, if chemicals can be produced from it. The huge availability of crude oil and the expected substantial decline in the demand for fuels imply that the future for proven technologies such as Fischer-Tropsch synthesis (FTS) or methanol to gasoline is not bright. The abundance of cheap ethane and the large availability of crude oil, on the other hand, have caused the SC industry to shift to these two extremes, making room for the on-purpose production of light olefins, such as by the catalytic dehydrogenation of propane. (C) 2017 THE AUTHORS. Published by Elsevier LTD on behalf of the Chinese Academy of Engineering and Higher Education Press Limited Company.
引用
收藏
页码:171 / 178
页数:8
相关论文
共 72 条
[1]   The valorization of plastic solid waste (PSW) by primary to quaternary routes: From re-use to energy and chemicals [J].
Al-Salem, S. M. ;
Lettieri, P. ;
Baeyens, J. .
PROGRESS IN ENERGY AND COMBUSTION SCIENCE, 2010, 36 (01) :103-129
[2]   Recycling and recovery routes of plastic solid waste (PSW): A review [J].
Al-Salem, S. M. ;
Lettieri, P. ;
Baeyens, J. .
WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2009, 29 (10) :2625-2643
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2016, IHS SAYS
[4]   Li-doped MgO From Different Preparative Routes for the Oxidative Coupling of Methane [J].
Arndt, S. ;
Simon, U. ;
Heitz, S. ;
Berthold, A. ;
Beck, B. ;
Goerke, O. ;
Epping, J. -D. ;
Otremba, T. ;
Aksu, Y. ;
Irran, E. ;
Laugel, G. ;
Driess, M. ;
Schubert, H. ;
Schomaecker, R. .
TOPICS IN CATALYSIS, 2011, 54 (16-18) :1266-1285
[5]  
BP plc, 2013, BP STAT REV WORLD EN
[6]   Review of fast pyrolysis of biomass and product upgrading [J].
Bridgwater, A. V. .
BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2012, 38 :68-94
[7]   Shale Gas Revolution: An Opportunity for the Production of Biobased Chemicals? [J].
Bruijnincx, Pieter C. A. ;
Weckhuysen, Bert M. .
ANGEWANDTE CHEMIE-INTERNATIONAL EDITION, 2013, 52 (46) :11980-11987
[8]   CONVERSION OF METHANOL AND OTHER O-COMPOUNDS TO HYDROCARBONS OVER ZEOLITE CATALYSTS [J].
CHANG, CD ;
SILVESTRI, AJ .
JOURNAL OF CATALYSIS, 1977, 47 (02) :249-259
[9]   A methanol to olefins review: Diffusion, coke formation and deactivation SAPO type catalysts [J].
Chen, D. ;
Moljord, K. ;
Holmen, A. .
MICROPOROUS AND MESOPOROUS MATERIALS, 2012, 164 :239-250
[10]   Recent advancements in ethylene and propylene production using the UOP/Hydro MTO process [J].
Chen, JQ ;
Bozzano, A ;
Glover, B ;
Fuglerud, T ;
Kvisle, S .
CATALYSIS TODAY, 2005, 106 (1-4) :103-107