Administrative justice and charging for long-term care

被引:1
作者
Bradley, G [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hull, Sch Nursing Social Work & Appl Hlth Studies, Kingston Upon Hull HU6 7RX, N Humberside, England
关键词
D O I
10.1093/bjsw/33.5.641
中图分类号
C916 [社会工作、社会管理、社会规划];
学科分类号
1204 ;
摘要
Drawing on the findings of a study in the area of charging for long-term care for older people, this article makes links between perceptions and practices of local authority professionals and the concept of administrative justice. The research revealed that discretion was exercised at all levels, although not all staff were aware of this. Cases may be treated differently and accidents of geography, local political culture or personnel are likely to affect the outcome of financial assessments of adults. The implications of this work remain timely since means tested assessment of personal care and residency costs look set to continue in England and Wales.
引用
收藏
页码:641 / 657
页数:17
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1993, EMPOWERMENT ASSESSME
[2]  
[Anonymous], CHARGING SOCIAL CARE
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1995, Anti-oppressive practice. Social care and the law
[4]  
[Anonymous], J SOCIAL WELFARE FAM
[5]  
[Anonymous], J SOCIAL WELFARE FAM, DOI DOI 10.1080/09649060110079332
[6]  
[Anonymous], OLD HABITS DIE HARD
[7]  
Bailey R., 1975, Radical social work
[8]  
BRADLEY G, 1997, DILEMMAS FINANCIAL A
[9]  
BRADLEY G, 2000, ETHICAL DILEMMAS ADM
[10]  
Bucková E, 2000, EKOL BRATISLAVA, V19, P3