Diagnostic accuracy of surface coil magnetic resonance imaging at 1.5 T for local staging of elevated risk prostate cancer

被引:20
作者
Kim, Brian [1 ]
Breau, Rodney H. [1 ]
Papadatos, Demetri [2 ]
Fergusson, Dean [3 ]
Doucette, Steve [3 ]
Cagiannos, Ilias [1 ]
Morash, Chris [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ottawa, Dept Surg, Div Urol, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[2] Univ Ottawa, Dept Radiol, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Ottawa, Ottawa Hlth Res Inst, Ottawa, ON, Canada
来源
CUAJ-CANADIAN UROLOGICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL | 2010年 / 4卷 / 04期
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
PREDICT PATHOLOGICAL STAGE; PELVIC LYMPH-NODES; PHASED-ARRAY COIL; EXTRACAPSULAR EXTENSION; RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; INCREMENTAL VALUE; CLINICAL STAGE; NOMOGRAM; CARCINOMA; METAANALYSIS;
D O I
10.5489/cuaj.09103
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: Preoperative prostate cancer stage predicts prognosis and affects treatment decisions. The purpose of this study was to estimate the sensitivity and specificity of surface coil magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for prostate cancer stage using surgical pathologic data as the reference standard. Methods: High-risk patients (>= cT3 or PSA >= 20 ng/mL or Gleason >= 8) and selected intermediate-risk patients (clinically bulky disease on exam or biopsy, cT2b/c, or Gleason 7 with >= 3 of 5 biopsy cores positive in a lobe) routinely received a pelvic MRI at our institution. The images of identified patients were reviewed by one radiologist who was blinded to clinical information. The radiologist reported presence or absence of tumour within each lobe of the prostate. Extraprostatic extension (EPE), seminal vesicle (SV) invasion and pelvic lymph node (PLN) metastasis were also reported. Radiological findings were compared with prostatectomy pathology reports. Results: During the study period, about 320 radical prostatectomies were performed. Of these, 32 had a preoperative surface coil pelvic MRI adequate for analysis. Pathologically, 53 of 64 (82.8%) prostate lobes contained tumour, 17 (26.6%) lobes had associated EPE, 12 (18.8%) had SV involvement and 7 (10.9%) sets of PLNs contained cancer. Magnetic resonance imaging sensitivity and specificity were, respectively, 94.3% and 81.8% for tumour location, 82.4% and 87.2% for EPE, 83.3% and 92.3% for SV invasion and 71.4% and 94.7% fer PLN involvement. Interpretation: Surface coil MRI accurately stages many prostate cancer patients with elevated risk of extraprostatic disease. This mode of imaging may be reasonable at centres that do not have endorectal coil MRI.
引用
收藏
页码:257 / 262
页数:6
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]   Transition zone prostate cancers: Features, detection, localization, and staging at endorectal MR imaging [J].
Akin, Oguz ;
Sala, Evis ;
Moskowitz, Chaya S. ;
Kuroiwa, Kentaro ;
Ishill, Nicole M. ;
Pucar, Darko ;
Scardino, Peter T. ;
Hricak, Hedvig .
RADIOLOGY, 2006, 239 (03) :784-792
[2]   Does body-coil magnetic-resonance imaging have a role in the preoperative staging of patients with clinically localized prostate cancer? [J].
Allen, DJ ;
Hindley, R ;
Clovis, S ;
O'Donnell, P ;
Cahill, D ;
Rottenberg, G ;
Popert, R .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2004, 94 (04) :534-538
[3]   PROSTATIC-CARCINOMA - STAGING WITH MR IMAGING AT 1.5-T [J].
BEZZI, M ;
KRESSEL, HY ;
ALLEN, KS ;
SCHIEBLER, ML ;
ALTMAN, HG ;
WEIN, AJ ;
POLLACK, HM .
RADIOLOGY, 1988, 169 (02) :339-346
[4]   CLINICAL STAGE-B PROSTATE CARCINOMA - STAGING WITH MR IMAGING [J].
BIONDETTI, PR ;
LEE, JKT ;
LING, D ;
CATALONA, WJ .
RADIOLOGY, 1987, 162 (02) :325-329
[5]   A preoperative nomogram identifying decreased risk of positive pelvic lymph nodes in patients with prostate cancer [J].
Cagiannos, I ;
Karakiewicz, P ;
Eastham, JA ;
Ohori, M ;
Rabbani, F ;
Gerigk, C ;
Reuter, V ;
Graefen, M ;
Hammerer, PG ;
Erbersdobler, A ;
Huland, H ;
Kupelian, P ;
Klein, E ;
Quinn, DI ;
Henshall, SM ;
Grygiel, JJ ;
Sutherland, RL ;
Stricker, PD ;
Morash, CG ;
Scardino, PT ;
Kattan, MW .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2003, 170 (05) :1798-1803
[6]   THE ABNORMAL PROSTATE - MR IMAGING AT 1.5 T WITH HISTOPATHOLOGIC CORRELATION [J].
CARROL, CL ;
SOMMER, FG ;
MCNEAL, JE ;
STAMEY, TA .
RADIOLOGY, 1987, 163 (02) :521-525
[7]   USE OF ENDORECTAL SURFACE COIL MAGNETIC-RESONANCE-IMAGING FOR LOCAL STAGING OF PROSTATE-CANCER [J].
CHELSKY, MJ ;
SCHNALL, MD ;
SEIDMON, EJ ;
POLLACK, HM .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1993, 150 (02) :391-395
[8]   Magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopic imaging of prostate cancer [J].
Coakley, FV ;
Qayyum, A ;
Kurhanewicz, J .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2003, 170 (06) :S69-S75
[9]   Discrimination of prostate cancer from normal peripheral zone and central gland tissue by using dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging [J].
Engelbrecht, MR ;
Huisman, HJ ;
Laheij, RJF ;
Jager, GJ ;
van Leenders, GJLH ;
Hulsbergen-Van De Kaa, CA ;
de la Rosette, JJMCH ;
Blickman, JG ;
Barentsz, JO .
RADIOLOGY, 2003, 229 (01) :248-254
[10]   Local staging of prostate cancer using magnetic resonance imaging: a meta-analysis [J].
Engelbrecht, MR ;
Jager, GJ ;
Laheij, RJ ;
Verbeek, ALM ;
van Lier, HJ ;
Barentsz, JO .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2002, 12 (09) :2294-2302