A new two-stage sampling design for estimating the maximum average time to flower

被引:9
|
作者
Mukhopadhyay, N
Son, MS
Ko, YC
机构
[1] Univ Connecticut, Dept Stat, Storrs, CT 06269 USA
[2] Univ Vermont, Dept Math & Stat, Burlington, VT 05401 USA
关键词
comparing varieties; confidence interval; Cornish-Fisher expansion; data analyses; data collection; designed experiment; fixed-width; marigold varieties; unequal pilot sample sizes; unequal variances;
D O I
10.1198/108571104X16196
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
A horticulturist was considering the number of days (X) each variety took from planting seeds to reach the stage when the first bud appeared for three local marigold varieties. The data X could be recorded with accuracy of one-half day. The primary interest was to estimate the maximum waiting time between "seeding" and "first budding" among three varieties under consideration. It was thought that a 99% confidence interval with width one day would suffice. The horticulturist felt comfortable to assume a normal distribution for the response variable. He provided positive lower bounds for the variances which forced pilot sample sizes to become unequal. We are not aware of any existing methodology with unequal pilot sample sizes that would readily apply here. Accordingly. a new two-stage sampling design was developed and implemented. The gathered data validated all assumptions made during the course of this investigation. Important exact as well as fame-sample properties of the proposed methodology are highlighted (Theorem 1). This methodology is proven to be theoretically superior (Theorem 2) to the existing Methodology for lame sample sizes provided that the pilot sizes could be "chosen" equal. For the experimental data on hand, the superiority of the new methodology has also been indicated (Section 4.3). The solution to the primary estimation problem ultimately led to a natural and yet nontraditional selection problem involving identification of the "Nvorst" marigold variety. For this selection problem, a practical approach is developed (Section 4.4) for evaluating the associated probability of correctly selecting the worst marigold variety.
引用
收藏
页码:479 / 499
页数:21
相关论文
共 13 条
  • [1] A new two-stage sampling design for estimating the maximum average time to flower
    Nitis Mukhopadhyay
    Mun S. Son
    Yong C. Ko
    Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics, 2004, 9
  • [2] Estimating confidence intervals and sampling proportions in two-stage prevalence designs
    Gambino B.
    Journal of Gambling Studies, 1999, 15 (3) : 243 - 245
  • [3] A new approach to determine the pilot sample size in two-stage sampling
    Mukhopadhyay, N
    COMMUNICATIONS IN STATISTICS-THEORY AND METHODS, 2005, 34 (06) : 1275 - 1295
  • [4] Optimal sampling strategies for two-stage studies
    Reilly, M
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1996, 143 (01) : 92 - 100
  • [5] Exact Evaluation of Two-Stage Procedures for Estimating the Difference Between Two Normal Means
    Zhang, Can
    SEQUENTIAL ANALYSIS-DESIGN METHODS AND APPLICATIONS, 2013, 32 (02): : 111 - 133
  • [6] Edgeworth expansions for two-stage sampling with applications to stratified and cluster sampling
    Mirakhmedov, Sherzod M.
    Jammalamadaka, Sreenivasa R.
    Ekstrom, Magnus
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF STATISTICS-REVUE CANADIENNE DE STATISTIQUE, 2015, 43 (04): : 578 - 599
  • [7] Adaptive two-stage one-per-stratum sampling
    Christman, MC
    ENVIRONMENTAL AND ECOLOGICAL STATISTICS, 2003, 10 (01) : 43 - 60
  • [8] Adaptive two-stage one-per-stratum sampling
    Mary C. Christman
    Environmental and Ecological Statistics, 2003, 10 : 43 - 60
  • [9] Flexible design of two-stage adaptive procedures for phase III clinical trials
    Koyama, Tatsuki
    CONTEMPORARY CLINICAL TRIALS, 2007, 28 (04) : 500 - 513
  • [10] Remote Sensing Based Two-Stage Sampling for Accuracy Assessment and Area Estimation of Land Cover Changes
    Gallaun, Heinz
    Steinegger, Martin
    Wack, Roland
    Schardt, Mathias
    Kornberger, Birgit
    Schmitt, Ursula
    REMOTE SENSING, 2015, 7 (09): : 11992 - 12008