Multicollinearity and measurement error in structural equation models: Implications for theory testing

被引:798
|
作者
Grewal, R [1 ]
Cote, JA
Baumgartner, H
机构
[1] Penn State Univ, Smeal Coll Adm, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
[2] Washington State Univ, Vancouver, WA 98686 USA
关键词
multicollinearity; measurement error; structural equation models;
D O I
10.1287/mksc.1040.0070
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The literature on structural equation models is unclear on whether and when multicollinearity may pose problems in theory testing (Type 11 errors). Two Monte Carlo simulation experiments show that multicollinearity can cause problems under certain conditions, specifically: (1) when multicollinearity is extreme, Type 11 error rates are generally unacceptably high (over 80%), (2) when multicollinearity is between 0.6 and 0.8, Type 11 error rates can be substantial (greater than 50% and frequently above 80%) if composite reliability is weak, explained variance (R-2) is low, and sample size is relatively small. However, as reliability improves (0.80 or higher), explained variance R-2 reaches 0.75, and sample becomes relatively large, Type 11 error rates become negligible. (3) When multicollinearity is between 0.4 and 0.5, Type 11 error rates tend to be quite small, except when reliability is weak, R-2 is low, and sample size is small, in which case error rates can still be high (greater than 50%). Methods for detecting and correcting multicollinearity are briefly discussed. However, since multicollinearity is difficult to manage after the fact, researchers should avoid problems by carefully managing the factors known to mitigate multicollinearity problems (particularly measurement error).
引用
收藏
页码:519 / 529
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Control charts for measurement error models
    Vasyl Golosnoy
    Benno Hildebrandt
    Steffen Köhler
    Wolfgang Schmid
    Miriam Isabel Seifert
    AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, 2023, 107 : 693 - 712
  • [42] Control charts for measurement error models
    Golosnoy, Vasyl
    Hildebrandt, Benno
    Koehler, Steffen
    Schmid, Wolfgang
    Seifert, Miriam Isabel
    ASTA-ADVANCES IN STATISTICAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 107 (04) : 693 - 712
  • [43] Direction of dependence in measurement error models
    Wiedermann, Wolfgang
    Merkle, Edgar C.
    von Eye, Alexander
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL & STATISTICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2018, 71 (01) : 117 - 145
  • [44] CLUSTERING IN GENERAL MEASUREMENT ERROR MODELS
    Su, Ya
    Reedy, Jill
    Carroll, Raymond J.
    STATISTICA SINICA, 2018, 28 (04) : 2337 - 2351
  • [45] Measurement error in statistical models of shape
    Farnell, Damian J. J.
    Pickles, Andrew
    Roberts, Christopher
    COMPUTER METHODS AND PROGRAMS IN BIOMEDICINE, 2011, 104 (03) : E29 - E44
  • [46] ON HIGH-DIMENSIONAL POISSON MODELS WITH MEASUREMENT ERROR: HYPOTHESIS TESTING FOR NONLINEAR NONCONVEX OPTIMIZATION
    Jiang, Fei
    Zhou, Yeqing
    Liu, Jianxuan
    Ma, Yanyuan
    ANNALS OF STATISTICS, 2023, 51 (01) : 233 - 259
  • [47] Measurement error in models of welfare participation
    Hernandez, Monica
    Pudney, Stephen
    JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 2007, 91 (1-2) : 327 - 341
  • [48] Estimation of nonlinear models with measurement error
    Schennach, SM
    ECONOMETRICA, 2004, 72 (01) : 33 - 75
  • [49] Measurement Model Misspecification in Dynamic Structural Equation Models: Power, Reliability, and Other Considerations
    Oh, Hyungeun
    Hunter, Michael D.
    Chow, Sy-Miin
    STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING-A MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL, 2025,
  • [50] Testing for measurement error in regression with autoregressive innovations
    Pokhriyal, Himanshu
    Balakrishna, N.
    COMMUNICATIONS IN STATISTICS-SIMULATION AND COMPUTATION, 2023, 52 (05) : 1834 - 1848