Multicollinearity and measurement error in structural equation models: Implications for theory testing

被引:817
作者
Grewal, R [1 ]
Cote, JA
Baumgartner, H
机构
[1] Penn State Univ, Smeal Coll Adm, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
[2] Washington State Univ, Vancouver, WA 98686 USA
关键词
multicollinearity; measurement error; structural equation models;
D O I
10.1287/mksc.1040.0070
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The literature on structural equation models is unclear on whether and when multicollinearity may pose problems in theory testing (Type 11 errors). Two Monte Carlo simulation experiments show that multicollinearity can cause problems under certain conditions, specifically: (1) when multicollinearity is extreme, Type 11 error rates are generally unacceptably high (over 80%), (2) when multicollinearity is between 0.6 and 0.8, Type 11 error rates can be substantial (greater than 50% and frequently above 80%) if composite reliability is weak, explained variance (R-2) is low, and sample size is relatively small. However, as reliability improves (0.80 or higher), explained variance R-2 reaches 0.75, and sample becomes relatively large, Type 11 error rates become negligible. (3) When multicollinearity is between 0.4 and 0.5, Type 11 error rates tend to be quite small, except when reliability is weak, R-2 is low, and sample size is small, in which case error rates can still be high (greater than 50%). Methods for detecting and correcting multicollinearity are briefly discussed. However, since multicollinearity is difficult to manage after the fact, researchers should avoid problems by carefully managing the factors known to mitigate multicollinearity problems (particularly measurement error).
引用
收藏
页码:519 / 529
页数:11
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]   A different paradigm for the initial colonisation of Sahul [J].
Allen, Jim ;
O'Connell, James F. .
ARCHAEOLOGY IN OCEANIA, 2020, 55 (01) :1-14
[2]   A MODEL OF THE DISTRIBUTORS PERSPECTIVE OF DISTRIBUTOR-MANUFACTURER WORKING RELATIONSHIPS [J].
ANDERSON, JC ;
NARUS, JA .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING, 1984, 48 (04) :62-74
[3]   THE EFFECT OF SAMPLING ERROR ON CONVERGENCE, IMPROPER SOLUTIONS, AND GOODNESS-OF-FIT INDEXES FOR MAXIMUM-LIKELIHOOD CONFIRMATORY FACTOR-ANALYSIS [J].
ANDERSON, JC ;
GERBING, DW .
PSYCHOMETRIKA, 1984, 49 (02) :155-173
[4]  
[Anonymous], SOCIOLOGICAL METHODO
[5]   A hierarchical Bayesian methodology for treating heterogeneity in structural equation models [J].
Ansari, A ;
Jedidi, K ;
Jagpal, S .
MARKETING SCIENCE, 2000, 19 (04) :328-347
[6]  
Bagozzi R. P., 1994, Principles of marketing research, P386
[7]  
Baumgartner H, 1996, International Journal of Research in Marketing, V13, P139, DOI [10.1016/0167-8116(95)00038-0, DOI 10.1016/0167-8116(95)00038-0]
[8]  
Belsley DA, 1980, Regression Diagnostics: Identifying Influential Data and Sources of Collinearity
[9]  
BENTLER PM, 1995, EQS WINDOWS
[10]   A POWER PRIMER [J].
COHEN, J .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1992, 112 (01) :155-159