Indoor Environmental Quality Determinants in the Buildings

被引:2
|
作者
Kraus, Michal [1 ]
Senitkova, Ingrid Juhasova [1 ]
机构
[1] Inst Technol & Business Ceske Budejovice, Dept Civil Engn, Okruzni 517-10, Ceske Budejovice 37001, Czech Republic
关键词
D O I
10.1088/1757-899X/960/4/042092
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
The presented aim of this study is to establish or reject the correlation (relationship) between the individual indoor environmental quality indicators and the total satisfaction with the indoor environment. The subjective satisfactory survey has been performed in 10 standardized university classrooms (Czechia) to evaluate the indoor environmental quality (IEQ). The IBSM SPPS Software Statistics ver. 25.0 was used to assess the Kendall nonparametric correlation analysis. Seven individual different indoor environmental quality indicators evaluating by subjective perceptions of the users were reviewed: air acceptability, thermal comfort, humidity comfort, odor comfort, acoustic comfort, visual comfort, and color comfort. The user's subjective perceptions of the indoor environment were collected by questionnaires Minimizing the ability to adapt and acclimatize was desirable. The statistically significant correlation (P < 0.01) were observed between the air acceptability (tau(b)= 0.249), the odor comfort (tau(b)= 0.260), the acoustic (tau(b)= -0.244), the visual comfort (tau(b)= 0.203), and the colour comfort (tau(b)= 0.192) and total satisfaction with the indoor environment. The thermal comfort and the humidity comfort are not statistically correlated with the total satisfaction of the indoor environment (P > 0.01).
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A Systematic Review on the Use of AI for Energy Efficiency and Indoor Environmental Quality in Buildings
    Ogundiran, James
    Asadi, Ehsan
    da Silva, Manuel Gameiro
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2024, 16 (09)
  • [32] Indoor environmental quality in WELL-certified and LEED-certified buildings
    Kent, Michael G.
    Parkinson, Thomas
    Schiavon, Stefano
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2024, 14 (01):
  • [33] Bayesian updates for indoor environmental quality (IEQ) acceptance model for residential buildings
    Tsang, Tsz Wun
    Mui, K. W.
    Wong, L. T.
    Yu, W.
    INTELLIGENT BUILDINGS INTERNATIONAL, 2021, 13 (01) : 17 - 32
  • [34] Indoor environmental quality of high occupancy dormitory buildings in winter in Shanghai, China
    Zhang, Ningbo
    Kang, Yanming
    Zhong, Ke
    Liu, Jiaping
    INDOOR AND BUILT ENVIRONMENT, 2016, 25 (04) : 712 - 722
  • [35] A methodology for the determination of indoor environmental quality in residential buildings through the monitoring of fundamental environmental parameters: A proposed Dwelling Environmental Quality Index
    Laskari, Marina
    Karatasou, Stavroula
    Santamouris, Mat
    INDOOR AND BUILT ENVIRONMENT, 2017, 26 (06) : 813 - 827
  • [36] Indoor environmental quality
    Cone, JE
    WESTERN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1998, 169 (06): : 373 - 374
  • [37] How does indoor environmental quality in green refurbished office buildings compare with the one in new certified buildings?
    Lee, Jang-Young
    Wargocki, Pawel
    Chan, Yiong-Huak
    Chen, Liu
    Tham, Kwok-Wai
    BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 171
  • [38] INDOOR AIR QUALITY OF THE OFFICE BUILDINGS
    Senitkova, Ingrid
    Tomcik, Tomas
    CESB 10: CENTRAL EUROPE TOWARDS SUSTAINABLE BUILDING - FROM THEORY TO PRACTICE, 2010, : 517 - 520
  • [39] Indoor air quality - buildings design
    Senitkova, Ingrid Juhasova
    8TH INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE BUILDING DEFECTS (BUILDING DEFECTS 2016), 2016, 93
  • [40] Indoor air quality for residential buildings
    Sherman, M
    ASHRAE JOURNAL, 1999, 41 (05) : 26 - 30