A comparison of bone tunnel measurements made using computed tomography and digital plain radiography after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

被引:66
作者
Webster, KE [1 ]
Feller, JA
Elliott, J
Hutchison, A
Payne, R
机构
[1] La Trobe Univ, Mcclure Musculoskeletal Res Ctr, Melbourne, Vic 3086, Australia
[2] La Trobe Univ, Med Ctr, Melbourne, Vic 3086, Australia
关键词
anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction; digital radiography; computed tomography; bone tunnel enlargement;
D O I
10.1016/j.arthro.2004.06.037
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare measurements of bone tunnel enlargement after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction using digital plain radiography and computed tomography (CT). Type of Study: Within-subjects comparison of 2 imaging techniques. Methods: Twenty-two patients who had undergone primary ACL reconstruction had anteroposterior and lateral digital plain radiographs and a CT scan of their operated knee 12 months after surgery. Using digital calipers, the sclerotic margins of each tunnel were measured at the widest point in each plane. Measurements were corrected for magnification and expressed as a percentage change in tunnel width compared with the size of the drill bit used at surgery. Results: In all but 1 instance, bone tunnels seen on CT were also seen on the corresponding digital radiograph. In the single incidence in which a bone tunnel was identified on the CT scan but not on the radiograph, the tunnel had the smallest diameter of the group and had decreased since surgery by 30%. There was no difference between the group-averaged CT and radiographic measurements for the tibia, but femoral tunnel radiographic measurements were clearly larger than CT, particularly for the anteroposterior view (P < .001). Moderate discrepancy was noted between individual radiograph and CT measurements. Conclusions: Digital plain radiography appears to be satisfactory for detecting bone tunnel enlargement following ACL reconstruction. Thus it may offer a time- and cost-effective means for monitoring this phenomenon. Level of Evidence: Level I.
引用
收藏
页码:946 / 950
页数:5
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]  
AGLIETTI P, 1998, KNEE SURG SPORT TR A, V6, P43
[2]  
CLATWORTHY M, 1999, ARTHROSCOPY, V15, pS5
[3]   Tunnel widening in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective evaluation of hamstring and patella tendon grafts [J].
Clatworthy, MG ;
Annear, P ;
Bulow, JU ;
Bartlett, RJ .
KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 1999, 7 (03) :138-145
[4]  
Dyer CR, 1995, ARTHROSCOPY, V11, P353
[5]   BONE TUNNEL ENLARGEMENT AFTER ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT REPLACEMENT [J].
FAHEY, M ;
INDELICATO, PA .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 1994, 22 (03) :410-414
[6]  
Fink C, 2001, ARTHROSCOPY, V17, P138, DOI 10.1053/jars.2001.21509
[7]   Bone tunnel enlargement after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Fact or fiction? [J].
Höher J. ;
Möller H.D. ;
Fu F.H. .
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 1998, 6 (4) :231-240
[8]   Bone tunnel enlargement after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with the hamstring autograft and endobutton fixation technique - A clinical, radiographic and magnetic resonance imaging study with 2 years follow-up [J].
Jansson, KA ;
Harilainen, A ;
Sandelin, J ;
Karjalainen, PT ;
Aronen, HJ ;
Tallroth, K .
KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 1999, 7 (05) :290-295
[9]  
Jaureguito JW, 1996, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P25
[10]   Tunnel expansion following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A comparison of hamstring and patellar tendon autografts [J].
L'Insalata J.C. ;
Klatt B. ;
Fu F.H. ;
Harner C.D. .
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 1997, 5 (4) :234-238