The attention habit: how reward learning shapes attentional selection

被引:303
作者
Anderson, Brian A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ, Dept Psychol & Brain Sci, 3400 N Charles St, Baltimore, MD 21218 USA
来源
YEAR IN COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE | 2016年 / 1369卷
关键词
selective attention; attentional capture; reward learning; reinforcement; incentive salience; basal ganglia; TOP-DOWN; OCULOMOTOR CAPTURE; NEURAL MECHANISMS; VISUAL-ATTENTION; GUIDED SEARCH; BOTTOM-UP; POP-OUT; ASSOCIATIONS; SALIENCE; PRIORITY;
D O I
10.1111/nyas.12957
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
There is growing consensus that reward plays an important role in the control of attention. Until recently, reward was thought to influence attention indirectly by modulating task-specific motivation and its effects on voluntary control over selection. Such an account was consistent with the goal-directed (endogenous) versus stimulus-driven (exogenous) framework that had long dominated the field of attention research. Now, a different perspective is emerging. Demonstrations that previously reward-associated stimuli can automatically capture attention even when physically inconspicuous and task-irrelevant challenge previously held assumptions about attentional control. The idea that attentional selection can be value driven, reflecting a distinct and previously unrecognized control mechanism, has gained traction. Since these early demonstrations, the influence of reward learning on attention has rapidly become an area of intense investigation, sparking many new insights. The result is an emerging picture of how the reward system of the brain automatically biases information processing. Here, I review the progress that has been made in this area, synthesizing a wealth of recent evidence to provide an integrated, up-to-date account of value-driven attention and some of its broader implications.
引用
收藏
页码:24 / 39
页数:16
相关论文
共 147 条
[71]   Fortune and reversals of fortune in visual search: Reward contingencies for pop-out targets affect search efficiency and target repetition effects [J].
Kristjansson, Arni ;
Sigurjonsdottir, Olafia ;
Driver, Jon .
ATTENTION PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 2010, 72 (05) :1229-1236
[72]   Where perception meets memory: A review of repetition priming in visual search tasks [J].
Kristjansson, Arni ;
Campana, Gianluca .
ATTENTION PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 2010, 72 (01) :5-18
[73]   Automatic attraction of attention to former targets in visual displays of letters [J].
Kyllingsbæk, S ;
Schneider, WX ;
Bundesen, C .
PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 2001, 63 (01) :85-98
[74]   Valuable orientations capture attention [J].
Laurent, Patryk A. ;
Hall, Michelle G. ;
Anderson, Brian A. ;
Yantis, Steven .
VISUAL COGNITION, 2015, 23 (1-2) :133-146
[75]   When Goals Conflict With Values: Counterproductive Attentional and Oculomotor Capture by Reward-Related Stimuli [J].
Le Pelley, Mike E. ;
Pearson, Daniel ;
Griffiths, Oren ;
Beesley, Tom .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 2015, 144 (01) :158-171
[76]   It's under control: Top-down search strategies can override attentional capture [J].
Leber, AB ;
Egeth, HE .
PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2006, 13 (01) :132-138
[77]   Reward-Based Transfer From Bottom-Up to Top-Down Search Tasks [J].
Lee, Jeongmi ;
Shomstein, Sarah .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2014, 25 (02) :466-475
[78]   A mind you can count on: validating breath counting as a behavioral measure of mindfulness [J].
Levinson, Daniel B. ;
Stoll, Eli L. ;
Kindy, Sonam D. ;
Merry, Hillary L. ;
Davidson, Richard J. .
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2014, 5
[79]   The root of all value: a neural common currency for choice [J].
Levy, Dino J. ;
Glimcher, Paul W. .
CURRENT OPINION IN NEUROBIOLOGY, 2012, 22 (06) :1027-1038
[80]   Attentional bias for drug cues in opiate dependence [J].
Lubman, DI ;
Peters, LA ;
Mogg, K ;
Bradley, BP ;
Deakin, JFW .
PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE, 2000, 30 (01) :169-175